Score Higher on Verified AD0-E902 | Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional Exam Questions with Answers

Understanding the Diagram:

The image depicts a Workfront Fusion scenario usingRoutersto split and manage multiple execution paths.

Fusion executes modules in aleft-to-rightandtop-to-bottomsequence along each path. Routers direct the flow to downstream modules.

Determining the Execution Sequence:

Path 1:

The first path begins withGoogle Drive. The Router branches out, directing execution sequentially to other modules.

Path 2:

The second path starts withEmailand continues downwards through the remaining modules.

Order Within Branches:

After passing through a Router, each branch completes its sequence of modules before moving to the next Router.

Why Option D is Correct:

Execution begins from the leftmost module (Google Drive) and flows rightward. The sequence is as follows:

Google Drive

Email

Data Store

Workfront

Salesforce

This matches the visual layout and Fusion's execution rules for scenarios with Routers.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A ("Google Drive > Email > Workfront > Data Store > Salesforce"):

Incorrect becauseWorkfrontdoes not precedeData Storein the execution order.

Option B ("Email > Workfront > Data Store > Salesforce > Google Drive"):

Incorrect because execution begins withGoogle Drive, not Email.

Option C ("Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce"):

Incorrect because it excludesGoogle Driveas the starting point and places modules out of sequence.

Execution Rules in Workfront Fusion:

Fusion executes modules in the order they appear visually, starting from left to right and top to bottom within each branch.

Routers split the execution into separate branches, which are completed sequentially.

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion: Execution Flow Rules

Workfront Community: Understanding Router and Module Execution

The correct execution sequence is Google Drive > Email > Data Store > Workfront > Salesforce, ensuring all paths are processed as per the scenario's layout.

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Problem Summary:

The Fusion scenario updates the project condition multiple times, once for each high-priority issue.

The desired behavior is to update the project condition only once, based on the overall condition of all associated issues.

Option Analysis:

A. Change the issue search module to result set of First Matching:

This would limit the search to only the first issue. However, this does not account for all issues on the project, leading to incomplete logic for setting the project condition.

B. Add an Ignore error directive as an error handler route for the update module:

Ignoring errors does not prevent multiple updates; it only suppresses errors in the workflow.

C. Create a separate scenario to update the overall project condition:

Correct. By separating the project update logic into a different scenario, the developer can ensure the condition is updated only once after analyzing all issues. The project condition is calculated holistically, based on the state of all high-priority issues.

D. Apply the Run Once flow control function:

"Run Once" controls execution at the scenario level, not within a module's iteration. It cannot prevent multiple updates in this context.

Why Separate Scenario is Best:

Simplifies Logic: A separate scenario can be designed to run after all issues have been checked, ensuring only one update per project.

Avoids Redundancy: Prevents unnecessary API calls to update the same project multiple times.

Improves Performance: Reduces the number of operations and bundles processed in the main scenario.

Implementation:

Create a separate scenario triggered after the issue-checking scenario completes.

Use aggregate data (e.g., a data store or intermediate processing) to evaluate the overall project condition before performing a single update.

Understanding the Issue:

TheWatch Eventsmodule is generating a high number of bundles because it monitors a broad range of project updates in Workfront, resulting in an overwhelming amount of data passing through the scenario.

The goal is to reduce the number of bundles by narrowing the scope of monitored events.

Why Option C is Correct:

Switching to Watch Record:

TheWatch Recordmodule allows users to monitor specific records (e.g., projects, tasks) with additional filtering options in thecriteriaorfilter box.

By applying filters, the module can focus only on relevant updates, significantly reducing the number of bundles being processed.

Example: Filtering for specific project statuses, update types, or assigned users ensures that only relevant changes are captured.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A ("Reducing the maximum number of returned events on the trigger"):

This limits the number of bundles processed per cycle but does not address the root cause, which is the broad monitoring scope of theWatch Eventsmodule.

Option B ("Reducing the maximum number of cycles in scenario settings"):

The number of cycles determines how many iterations the scenario performs in one run but does not reduce the number of bundles entering the scenario.

Steps to Use the Watch Record Module:

Replace theWatch Eventsmodule withWatch Record.

Specify the record type to monitor (e.g., Project).

Use the optional filter box to apply criteria, such as specific project fields, statuses, or other conditions.

Activate the scenario to test the refined data flow.

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion: Watch Record Module

Workfront Community: Managing High Bundle Volumes in Fusion