Practice Free API-571 Corrosion and Materials Professional Exam Questions Answers With Explanation

From API RP 571 and RP 932-B:

“In hydroprocessing reactor effluent systems, the most common corrosion mechanism is ammonium bisulfide (NH?HS) corrosion, which forms in the presence of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia.”

“NH?HS attacks carbon steel aggressively under turbulent flow and at low pH.”

Correct answer is B – ammonium bisulfide corrosion.

From API RP 571 on Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC):

“MIC depends on the presence of water, nutrients, and specific microbial species such as SRB (sulfate-reducing bacteria).”

“While flow velocity may influence deposition and oxygen content, MIC can occur in both stagnant and flowing systems. Hence, it's not strongly dependent on velocity.”

Thus, option D is correct — MIC is largely independent of flow velocity.

API RP 571 on HTHA states:

“Acoustic emission testing is not currently a proven or reliable method for identifying HTHA in refinery components.”

“HTHA typically occurs internally, not as surface blisters, and is not limited to welds. Austenitic (300 series) stainless steels are generally resistant at normal refinery conditions.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.3 – High Temperature Hydrogen Attack)

Thus, option A is the most accurate statement.

API RP 571, Naphthenic Acid Corrosion:

“Molybdenum significantly improves resistance to naphthenic acid attack. Alloys such as 317, 316Mo, and Alloy 20 are used in severe NAC environments due to higher Mo content.”

“Chromium and nickel play secondary roles; molybdenum is the key element.”

Answer is A – Molybdenum.

As per API RP 945 (4th Edition, 2022):

“Post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) is the most effective method for reducing residual stresses that contribute to amine SCC. PWHT minimizes the stress intensity required for crack initiation and growth.”

Lowering temperature helps but is not always feasible.

Water content and amine concentration affect SCC but are not as impactful as PWHT.

Thus, Option A (Post-weld heat treatment) is the most effective mitigation.

API RP 945, dedicated to environmental cracking in amine units, states:

“Carbon steel is widely used in amine systems but is particularly susceptible to localized corrosion, under-deposit corrosion, and stress corrosion cracking, especially in high-pressure or rich amine environments.”

“Proper control of amine quality, oxygen ingress, and temperature is critical to avoid accelerated corrosion in carbon steel equipment.”

Thus, carbon steels are the most commonly affected materials, making option C correct.

According to API RP 571 and API RP 751 (HF Alkylation Units):

“HF acid corrosion rates increase with elevated temperature and higher water content. This is because water acts as an ionizing agent that facilitates the acid’s attack on steel.”

“Corrosion is minimized when water content is strictly controlled, usually between 0.5–1.5%.”

“Contrary to some assumptions, increasing HF acid concentration actually decreases corrosivity.”

Hence, option B is correct.

According to API RP 571 Section 5.2.1 (Fatigue – High Cycle and Low Cycle):

“Unsupported small-bore attachments like vents and drains are prone to high-cycle mechanical fatigue due to vibration. These attachments experience cyclic stress, especially near welds or bends.”

Thermal overload is unlikely without over-temperature data.

SSC (Option C) requires a wet H2S environment, which is not indicated.

Weld defects may contribute but are less likely the root cause without other signs.

Hence, mechanical fatigue (Option A) is most probable in this configuration.

API RP 571 explains under Condensate Corrosion (CO? Corrosion):

“In condensate systems, carbon dioxide dissolves in the water forming carbonic acid, which leads to localized corrosion, including grooving and under-deposit attack, especially at low points like the bottom of horizontal piping.”

“This is most commonly observed in steam condensate return lines, and the damage is localized due to stratification.”

This matches the scenario described, where internal grooving at the bottom of steam condensate piping is characteristic of CO?-induced corrosion. Hence, option A is correct.

API RP 571 on Brittle Fracture notes:

“The primary factor influencing brittle fracture is material toughness, especially at low temperatures.”

“Materials with low fracture toughness are susceptible to catastrophic failure when stressed below their ductile-to-brittle transition temperature.”

Hence, option A is correct.

API RP 571 under Sulfidation (High Temperature Sulfidic Corrosion) recommends:

“Thickness monitoring using ultrasonic testing (UT) or radiographic testing (RT) is the most common method for detection of wall loss due to sulfidation.”

“Sulfidation results in uniform thinning, especially in low Cr steels in hydrogen/H?S environments.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.1 – Sulfidation)

Thus, option A is the most appropriate and effective inspection method.

From API RP 571 Section 4.2.3 (Galvanic Corrosion):

“Galvanic corrosion occurs when two dissimilar metals are in electrical contact in the presence of an electrolyte. The more anodic metal corrodes preferentially.”

Contact without insulation and in presence of an electrolyte (like water or brine) is key to galvanic action.

Insulating or coating prevents electrical connection or electrolyte contact, reducing corrosion risk.

Hence, Option D correctly describes the condition that increases galvanic corrosion potential.

API RP 751, which governs HF alkylation units, specifies:

“The total residuals of chromium, nickel, and copper in carbon steel used in HF service should be less than 0.15 wt.% to minimize corrosion risk.”

“Higher residuals increase the reactivity and corrosion rate of carbon steel in the presence of HF acid.”

(Reference: API RP 751, Section 5.3 – Materials Specification for HF Units)

Therefore, option A is the correct choice.

As per API RP 571 Section 5.1.4.2 (Metal Dusting):

“Metal dusting is a type of carburization attack that typically occurs in high carbon activity environments, with temperatures generally between 900°F and 1200°F (480°C to 650°C), although damage has been reported as low as 600°F (315°C).”

Therefore, the commonly accepted operational range is best described by Option A: 600°F–1200°F (315°C–650°C).

From API RP 571 Section 5.1.1.3 (Amine Corrosion):

“Amine corrosion is a form of general or localized corrosion caused by the presence of amine solutions used to remove acid gases (H?S and CO?)... Corrosion is most severe in areas where acid gas loading is high.”

While temperature and concentration are contributing factors, the primary driver is dissolved acid gases such as CO? and H?S.

Thus, the correct answer is Option C.

As per API RP 571 and further clarified in API RP 939-C:

“An arbitrary threshold of 50 ppmw H?S in the aqueous phase is often used to define when carbon and low alloy steels become susceptible to cracking damage in wet H?S environments.”

“Below this level, the risk of SSC, HIC, and SOHIC is considered lower, although damage has still occurred at lower concentrations depending on stress and metallurgical conditions.”

Therefore, the correct answer is option D (50 ppmw).

According to API RP 571:

“Oxidation is the reaction of metal and oxygen to form oxides. It generally occurs in high temperature environments with excess oxygen.”

“Sulfidation is a high temperature corrosion mechanism that occurs due to interaction between sulfur-containing compounds and metal surfaces, forming metal sulfides. Like oxidation, sulfidation occurs in environments above 500 °F (260 °C).”

“Both oxidation and sulfidation can occur concurrently, particularly in mixed environments of oxygen and sulfur.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.3 – Oxidation & Sulfidation)

These two mechanisms are thermally activated and occur in elevated temperature conditions found in heaters, furnaces, and piping systems. Hence, option B is correct.

According to API RP 571, under Naphthenic Acid Corrosion (NAC):

“The most severe corrosion is typically found in areas of high velocity and turbulence, such as at pump around nozzles, transfer lines, elbows, reducers, and orifices.”

“NAC is characterized by uniform thinning and can accelerate significantly where flow-induced erosion is present.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.4.1 – Naphthenic Acid Corrosion)

This clearly establishes that high velocity and turbulence increase NAC severity, making option D correct.

According to API RP 571 and API RP 751:

“In HF alkylation units, carbon steel can be used if weld hardness is controlled to ? 200 Brinell (BHN). Exceeding this can significantly increase the corrosion rate and susceptibility to cracking.”

“Hard welds act as preferential corrosion sites due to microstructural inhomogeneity and stress concentration.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.4 – Hydrofluoric Acid Corrosion; API RP 751, Section 5.3 – Materials of Construction)

Thus, option D is correct.

According to API RP 941, and also noted in RP 571:

“Nickel significantly improves resistance to HTHA (High Temperature Hydrogen Attack) by stabilizing austenitic phases and reducing carbide decomposition.”

Hence, option C is correct.

From API RP 571, brittle fracture prevention measures include:

“Postweld Heat Treatment (PWHT) reduces residual stresses in the heat affected zone and base metal, thus lowering susceptibility to brittle fracture.”

“PWHT is particularly effective when applied to pressure-containing components fabricated from carbon steel or low-alloy steel that will experience low-temperature service.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.2 – Brittle Fracture)

Therefore, while other measures may reduce stress or detect flaws, PWHT directly targets one of the root causes: residual stress. Thus, option D is the best prevention method.

As per API RP 571 Section 5.3.2.3 (Spheroidization):

“Spheroidization is the transformation of the microstructure of steels into spherical carbides, leading to reduced strength and hardness, especially after extended high-temperature exposure. It’s commonly seen in carbon and low alloy steels in refining heaters and reactors.”

It reduces strength and sometimes hardness.

It increases ductility, not reduces.

SCC potential is not directly tied to this change.

Therefore, Option D (Loss of strength) is correct.

API RP 571 – Sulfidation:

“Sulfidation generally results in uniform thinning of iron-based alloys at temperatures above 500°F (260°C).”

“It is classified as a form of general corrosion, although it can be accelerated in turbulent flow areas.”

So, option A is correct.

Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking (Cl-SCC) is a serious form of corrosion primarily affecting austenitic stainless steels and some duplex stainless steels, particularly when exposed to chloride-containing environments at elevated temperatures.

According to API RP 571 Section 5.1.2.3 (Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking – Cl-SCC):

“Austenitic stainless steels (e.g., 300 series such as Types 304 and 316) are the most susceptible to Cl-SCC... Duplex stainless steels have greater resistance but are not immune, especially at temperatures >150°F (65°C)... Ferritic stainless steels (400 series) are generally not susceptible.”

Thus, Option A (400 Series Stainless Steel) is not susceptible to chloride SCC, making it the correct answer.

API RP 571 under Oxidation states:

“Resistance to oxidation is improved significantly by increasing chromium content, as it promotes the formation of a protective chromium oxide (Cr?O?) layer.”

“Nickel may aid in high-temperature strength but does not directly improve oxidation resistance like chromium does.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 5.1.1 – Oxidation)

Hence, option A is correct.

API RP 571 notes that for detecting existing cracks or flaws that may lead to brittle fracture, especially those that initiate at welds or surface stress points:

“Wet fluorescent magnetic-particle inspection is highly effective for detecting surface-breaking flaws in ferromagnetic materials that are susceptible to brittle fracture.”

“It is sensitive to tight cracks and surface discontinuities that may serve as initiation sites for brittle fracture.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.2 – Brittle Fracture)

Therefore, option A is correct as it is the most effective NDE technique for detecting early signs of brittle cracking.

API RP 571 states under the section Phosphoric Acid Corrosion:

“Corrosion usually occurs when the acid dries out and forms concentrated phosphoric acid deposits, which are very aggressive to carbon steel.”

“Drying or concentration occurs due to poor flow distribution or operational upsets. Localized areas may experience acid concentration due to vaporization.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.8 – Phosphoric Acid Corrosion)

Therefore, the most aggressive corrosion occurs when the acid dries out, making option D correct.

API RP 571, in its discussion on Wet H?S Damage, including HIC, SOHIC, and SSC, consistently identifies a shared mechanism:

“All wet H?S-related damage mechanisms involve the absorption of atomic hydrogen, formed at the steel surface by the corrosion reaction in the presence of H?S.”

“The absorbed hydrogen may diffuse into the steel, accumulate at trap sites, and cause cracking or blistering.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.2.7 – Wet H?S Damage Mechanisms)

Thus, hydrogen absorption and permeation is a unifying mechanism across all these damage modes. Therefore, option D is correct.