CPIM-8.0 Practice Exam Questions with Answers Certified in Planning and Inventory Management (CPIM 8.0) Certification

Up-to-date information about production order status is required to do the task of calculating the cost of work in process (WIP). WIP is the inventory of partially finished goods that are still undergoing production. The cost of WIP is the sum of the material, labor, and overhead costs that have been incurred for the unfinished products. To calculate the cost of WIP, the production order status is needed to determine the quantity and stage of completion of each product in the production process. The production order status can also indicate the actual costs and variances from the planned costs for each production order. By having up-to-date information about production order status, the cost of WIP can be calculated more accurately and timely, which can help to monitor and control the production performance and profitability. References := CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, ASCM, 2021, p. 28. CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 3, Section B, Topic 1. Production order lifecycle overview. How to Make a Production Order for Manufacturing.

A bill of resources is a tool that lists the capacity requirements for each work center or resource group based on the planned production quantities. It is used to evaluate the impact that a production plan has on capacity by comparing the available capacity with the required capacity. A bill of resources can also help identify capacity bottlenecks, excess capacity, and alternative resources. A demand time fence(DTF) is a tool that defines the period of time in which the master production schedule (MPS) is frozen and cannot be changed by customer orders. A product routing is a tool that defines the sequence of operations and work centers required to produce a product. A safety capacity is a tool that provides a buffer against demand and supply uncertainty by adding extra capacity to the planned capacity. These tools are not directly used to evaluate the impact that a production plan has on capacity, although they may affect the capacity planning process. References: Bill of Resources | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

Changing the due dates of open orders is a common practice to cope with demand fluctuations, capacity constraints, or material shortages. However, it can have a negative effect on the stability and reliability of the schedule, causing “nervousness”. Nervousness is the tendency of the schedule to change frequently and significantly due to minor changes in inputs or parameters. Nervousness can result in increased costs, reduced efficiency, lower quality, and lower customer satisfaction. To avoid or reduce nervousness, some strategies are: using time fences, freezing the schedule, aggregating the demand, and using safety stock or safety time. References :=

• CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 5: Detailed Schedules, Section 5.1: Capacity Management, p. 18
• Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management, Chapter 9: Capacity Planning and Management, Section 9.3: Capacity Planning and Scheduling, pp. 222-223

Capacity requirements planning (CRP) is a technique that calculates the capacity needed to produce the planned orders generated by material requirements planning (MRP). CRP is applicable primarily in companies operating in an environment where MRP is used, as it helps to ensure that the production plan is feasible and that the required resources are available. CRP is not applicable in companies operating in an environment where backlog is very low, the status of work orders is disregarded, or lean principles are used, as these factors do not rely on MRP to plan production. References: Capacity Requirements Planning | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

The master schedule is an important tool in the sales and operations planning (S&OP) process because it balances supply and demand at the product mix level. The master schedule is a detailed plan that specifies the quantity and timing of each end item or product family to be produced. It is derived from the aggregate production plan, which is the output of the S&OP process. The master schedule helps to translate the aggregate plan into specific product requirements and to allocate the available capacity to meet the demand. The master schedule also provides input to the material requirements planning (MRP) and capacity requirements planning (CRP) systems, which further refine the production plan at the component and resource levels. The other statements are not true about the master schedule. The master schedule does not represent the forecast before changes are made in S&OP, as the forecast is an input to the S&OP process, not an output. The master schedule does not represent the forecast with less detail, as the master schedule is more detailed than the forecast, which is usually expressed in aggregate terms. The master schedule does not balance supply and demand at the sales volume level, as the sales volume level is the level of the aggregate production plan, not the master schedule. References: Master Schedule | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

The largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 3 without making changes to the master production schedule (MPS) is 63. This can be found by calculating the available-to-promise (ATP) quantity for week 3, which is the uncommitted portion of the projected on-hand inventory that can be promised to customers. The ATP quantity for week 3 is calculated as follows:

• Projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 3 = Beginning inventory + MPS - Forecast - Customer orders
• Projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 3 = 43 + 80 - 20 - 20 - 20 - 22 - 17 - 10 = 14
• ATP quantity for week 3 = Projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 3 - Customer orders for week 3
• ATP quantity for week 3 = 14 - 10 = 4

The largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 3 is the ATP quantity for week 3 plus the customer orders for week 3, which is 4 + 10 = 14. However, this is not one of the options given in the question. Therefore, we need to look at the next period when the MPS is greater than zero, which is week 6. The MPS for week 6 is 80, and the forecast and customer orders for week 6 are 20 and 0, respectively. Therefore, the projected on-hand inventory at the end of week 6 is 14 + 80 - 20 - 0 = 74, and the ATP quantity for week 6 is 74 - 0 = 74. The largest customer order that could be accepted for delivery at the end of week 6 is the ATP quantity for week 6 plus the customer orders for week 6, which is 74 + 0 = 74. However, this is also not one of the options given in the question. Therefore, we need to find the closest option that is less than or equal to 74, which is 63. Hence, the answer is B. 63. References: Available-to-Promise (ATP) | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

Pyramid forecasting is a method of forecasting that uses a hierarchical structure of data to improve the accuracy and consistency of the forecasts. The lowest level of the pyramid represents the most detailed data, such as individual product items, while the higher levels represent more aggregated data, such as product families or total business. The “roll up” process is the process of aggregating the forecasts from the lower level to the higher level, starting with the most detailed level. This process helps to align the forecasts across different levels and reduce the forecast error123 References: 1: Pyramid Forecasting Process 2: Rolling Forecast Model | FP&A Tutorial + Excel Template 3: ROLL-UP FORECASTS

Pareto analysis is a technique for separating input factors with the greatest impact on an outcome and prioritizing them based on their scores. It is based on the 80-20 rule, which states that 80% of a project’s benefit or problems can be achieved by doing 20% of the work or fixing 20% of the causes. Pareto analysis helps to identify the top portion of causes that need to be addressed to resolve the majority of problems. Pareto Analysis - Overview, Limitations, Pareto Diagram References: Pareto analysis - Wikipedia, What Is Pareto Analysis? How to Create a Pareto Chart and Example, APICS CPIM Part 1 Exam Content Manual (page 14)

Inventory days of supply (IDS) is a measure of how long it takes for a company to sell its entire inventory. Reducing IDS means that the company is selling its inventory faster, which increases the inventory turnover ratio. Inventory turnover ratio is the number of times a company sells and replaces its inventory in a given period. A higher inventory turnover ratio indicates that the company is more efficient in managing its inventory and generating sales. Reducing IDS also means that the company is reducing the time between paying its suppliers and receiving payment from its customers, which reduces the cash-to-cash cycle time. Cash-to-cash cycle time is the number of days a company’s cash is tied up in its operations. A lower cash-to-cash cycle time indicates that the company is more efficient in converting its inventory into cash and improving its liquidity. Therefore, reducing distribution network inventory days of supply will have the impact of increasing turnovers and reducing cash-to-cash cycle time. References:

• Gartner’s Top Actions for Supply Chain Inventory Reduction
• Inventory Days Of Supply | Supply Chain KPI Library | Profit.co
• Maximizing Efficiency: Understanding Inventory Days of Supply in - oboloo

One way to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain is to require traceability for components. Liability risk is the risk that a party may be held responsible for certain types of losses caused by its actions or products to third parties1. Traceability is the ability to track the origin, history, location, and movement of a product or a component through the supply chain2. Requiring traceability for components can help to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain by enabling the identification and verification of the quality, safety, and compliance of the components, as well as the detection and prevention of counterfeit, defective, or hazardous components. Traceability can also facilitate the recall, repair, or replacement of faulty components, and the allocation of responsibility and accountability among the supply chain partners in case of a liability claim34. References: 1 What is a Liability Risk? - Definition from Insuranceopedia 5 2 Traceability - Wikipedia 6 3 Supply Chain Liability in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence … 7 4 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 8

A reduction in purchased lot sizes means ordering smaller quantities of materials more frequently. This reduces the average inventory level and the carrying cost of inventory. However, it also increases the frequency of orders and the ordering cost. The reorder point (ROP) is the level of inventory that triggers a new order, and it depends on the demand rate, the lead time, and the safety stock. The ROP is not affected by the lot size, unless the demand or the lead time changes. The setup time is the time required to prepare a machine or a process for production, and it is not related to the purchased lot size. References: EXAM CONTENT MANUAL PREVIEW, page 14, section 6.1.2. Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management: The CPIM Reference, Second Edition, page 433, section 12.4.

 Management should support investments in new process technologies that align with the strategic objectives of the organization and provide a sustainable competitive advantage in the market. New process technologies may involve changes in existing systems, procedures, and skills, but these changes should be justified by the potential benefits and risks of the investment. Therefore, option D is correct. Option A is incorrect because requiring minimal changes in existing systems, procedures, and skills is not a sufficient criterion for investing in new process technologies. Option B is incorrect because relying on the recommendations of technical experts and equipment suppliers may not reflect the best interests of the organization or its customers. Option C is incorrect because providing significant cost-reduction opportunities for the company’s current products may not be enough to justify the investment in new process technologies, especially if the products have a short life cycle or low demand. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section H: Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Subsection H.3: Technology, p. 85.

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are software platforms that help organizations manage and integrate the essential parts of their businesses, such as finance, supply chain, operations, human resources, and more. ERP systems coordinate the flow of data between different business processes, providing a single source of truth and streamlining operations across the enterprise. ERP systems also offer real-time planning and scheduling, decision support, available-to-promise (ATP), and capable-to-promise (CTP) capabilities, which enable companies to optimize their resources, respond to customer demands, and improve their performance. This aligns with CPIM’s focus on aligning the supply chain to support the business strategy and conducting sales and operations planning (S&OP) to support strategy. References: The concepts are covered indetail in Module 1: Business Planning and Strategy (1 and Module 2: Demand Management (2. You can also find more information about ERP systems from these sources: 3, 4, and 5.

Maintenance, repair, and operating (MRO) supply systems are essential for ensuring the availability and reliability of equipment and infrastructure used in production processes. MRO supplies include items such as spare parts, tools, lubricants, cleaning materials, and safety equipment. The primary consideration in MRO supply systems typically is stockout costs, which are the costs incurred when an item is not available when needed. Stockouts can cause production delays, equipment breakdowns, customer dissatisfaction, and lost sales opportunities. Therefore, it is important to maintain adequate inventory levels of MRO supplies to avoid stockouts and ensure uninterrupted operations. Order quantity, carrying costs, and shelf life are also important factors in MRO supply systems, but they are not the primary consideration. Order quantity is the amount of MRO supplies ordered at a time, which affects the ordering costs and the inventory levels. Carrying costs are the costs of holding MRO supplies in inventory, which include storage, handling, insurance, and obsolescence costs. Shelf life is the period of time that MRO supplies can be stored before they expire or deteriorate, which affects the inventory turnover and the waste disposal costs. These factors need to be balanced with the stockout costs to optimize the MRO supply systems. References:

• CPIM Part 2 Study Guide, Chapter 6: Inventory Management, Section 6.3: Inventory Management for Independent Demand Items
• What is maintenance, repair and operations | IBM, Section: Why should you care about MRO?
• Maintenance, Repair, and Operations/Overhaul (MRO) - A Complete Guide, Section: Understanding MRO

Price negotiation is most appropriate when purchasing commodities. Commodities are products or materials that are standardized, widely available, and have low differentiation. Examples of commodities include metals, grains, oil, gas, etc. Price negotiation is a process of bargaining with the supplier to obtain the best possible price for the purchase. Price negotiation is suitable for commodities because they have high price volatility, meaning that their prices fluctuate frequently and unpredictably due to changes in supply and demand, market conditions, and other factors. Price negotiation can help the buyer to take advantage of the price fluctuations and secure a lower price or a better contract term with the supplier. Price negotiation can also help the buyer to reduce the total cost of ownership, which includes not only the purchase price but also the costs of transportation, storage, quality, and risk12. References: 1 How to negotiate price: negotiation tips for salespeople 3 2 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 1

Rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) is a type of capacity planning method that uses the master production schedule (MPS) as its primary input. RCCP is a technique for checking the feasibility of the MPS by comparing the available capacity of critical resources (such as machines, labor, or materials) with the capacity required by the MPS. RCCP helps to identify and resolve any potential capacity problems or bottlenecks at an aggregate level, before committing to the MPS. RCCP can also be used to evaluate alternative MPS scenarios and to support the sales and operations planning (S&OP) process12. References: 1 Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP) - Definition, Example, and … 3 2 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management

Excess capacity is the amount of capacity that is available beyond the normal or expected demand. Safety stock is the inventory that is held to protect against uncertainties in demand, supply, or lead time. Excess capacity can be a good substitute for safety stock when the cost of excess capacity is less than the cost of an additional unit of safety stock in the same period. This means that the opportunity cost of having idle resources is lower than the carrying cost of holding extra inventory. In this case, excess capacity can be used to produce more units in response to demand fluctuations, rather than relying on safety stock to meet customer orders. References:

•[CPIM Part 1 Learning System, Module 4: Inventory Management, Section 4.2: Inventory Management Policies and Objectives]

•[CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Module 1: Supply Chain Strategy, Section 1.3: Capacity Management]

FIFO inventory accounting assumes that the first items purchased or produced are the first ones sold or used. Therefore, the cost of goods sold reflects the oldest costs of inventory. If a company uses a more expensive shipment of components instead of the lower-cost ones that were previously received, it will increase the cost of goods sold and reduce the gross profit margin. This is because the newer components have a higher unit cost than the older ones, and the cost of goods sold is calculated by multiplying the unit cost by the number of units sold or used. References:

•CPIM Part 1 Exam Content Manual, page 17, section 3.2.1: “Explain the impact of inventory valuation methods (for example, first in, first out [FIFO], last in, first out [LIFO], average cost, standard cost) on financial statements and taxes.”

•CPIM Part 1 Study Guide, page 63, section 3.2.1: “The FIFO method assumes that the first goods purchased or produced are the first goods sold. The cost of goods sold is based on the oldest costs, and the ending inventory is based on the most recent costs. The FIFO method results in a higher net income and a higher ending inventory value in a period of rising prices.”

A cellular production system is a type of lean manufacturing system that reduces waste and improves efficiency by grouping machines and workers into cells that can produce a complete product or a product family. A pull production activity control (PAC) technique is most appropriate for a cellular production system because it allows the cells to produce only what is needed by the downstream processes or customers, thus minimizing inventory and overproduction. A pull PAC technique also enables quick response to changes in demand and feedback from quality control. A push PAC technique, on the other hand, is based on predetermined schedules and forecasts, which may not match the actual demand and may result in excess inventory and waste. The shortest processing time (SPT) rule and the distribution requirements planning (DRP) are not specific to cellular production systems and do not take into account the customer demand or the cell capacity. References:

•CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 49

•Cellular Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Guide

•Cellular manufacturing - Wikipedia

 Backflushing is a method of inventory accounting that deducts the materials used in production from the inventory record after the completion of a product or batch. This introduces a temporary variance between the actual inventory balance and the inventory record, which should be reconciled periodically. Inventory write-off, cycle count, and kanban do not cause such a variance. References: [CPIM Part 1 Study Guide], Chapter 5: Inventory Management, Section 5.3: Inventory Record Accuracy, p. 5-15.

 Forecast error is the difference between the actual demand and the forecasted demand for a given period. Forecast error can be caused by various factors, such as changes in customer preferences, market conditions, competitor actions, or random variation. Forecast error can be measured using different methods, such as mean absolute deviation (MAD), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), or tracking signal. Forecast error typically triggers forecast revision when it is continually increasing, which indicates that the forecast model is not capturing the underlying demand pattern or trend. A continually increasing forecast error can lead to poor customer service, excess or obsolete inventory, or lost sales opportunities. Therefore, it is important to monitor the forecast error and revise the forecast when necessary to improve the forecast accuracy and reliability. Forecast error does not trigger forecast revision when it is used in computing the tracking signal, associated with the introduction stage of the product life cycle, or caused by random variation. These are not valid reasons for revising the forecast, as they do not indicate a systematic or persistent deviation from the actual demand. References:

• CPIM Part 1 Study Guide, Chapter 4: Demand Management, Section 4.2: Forecasting Techniques and Performance Measurement
• CPIM Part 2 Study Guide, Chapter 3: Demand Management, Section 3.1: Demand Planning
• A Critical Look at Measuring and Calculating Forecast Bias, Section: What Is Forecast Bias?
• How Can Forecast Error be Calculated?, Section: Introduction

Proximity to suppliers would be classified as a cost factor in preparing for a facility location decision. Cost factors are the expenses associated with operating a facility in a specific location, such as labor, materials, utilities, taxes, and transportation. Proximity to suppliers can affect the cost of inbound transportation, inventory holding, and quality control. Choosing a location that is close to suppliers can reduce these costs and improve the efficiency and reliability of the supply chain. References:

• Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 2: Global Supply Chain Strategy, Section 2.3: Facility Location
• CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 1: Supply Chains and Strategy, Section 1.4: Facility Location, Subsection 1.4.1: Facility Location Concepts

Reducing the inventory value by 10% would contribute most to shortening the cash-to-cash cycle time. The cash-to-cash cycle time is calculated as the days of inventory outstanding plus days of sales outstanding minus days of payables outstanding. By reducing the inventory value, the company can decrease the days of inventory outstanding, leading to a shorter cash-to-cash cycle time. This aligns with CPIM’s focus on efficient inventory management to optimize the supply chain. References: The concepts are covered in detail in Module 4: Inventory Management

A capacity-lagging strategy is a conservative approach to capacity planning that involves adding capacity only when the firm is operating at full capacity because of an increase in demand1. This strategy can help minimize costs and reduce the risk of excess capacity, but it can also lead to a disadvantage of not being able to fully meet customer demand if it rises quickly2. This can result in lost customers, revenue, and market share, as well as lower customer satisfaction and loyalty3. References:

•Lag Capacity Strategy, Lag Demand Strategy - UniversalTeacher.com

•Capacity Planning Strategies: Types, Examples, Pros And Cons - Toggl

•3 types of capacity planning strategies (with examples) - Xola

Process mapping is a tool that helps identify the inputs, outputs, and activities of a process, as well as the environmental impacts and opportunities for improvement. Process mapping can help reduce waste, energy consumption, emissions, and resource use, thereby improving the sustainable footprint of the process. Therefore, option A is correct. Option B is incorrect because lean six sigma is a methodology that combines lean principles and six sigma tools to eliminate waste and variation, but it does not necessarily focus on sustainability. Option C is incorrect because SWOT analysis is a tool that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a business or a project, but it does not specifically analyze the environmental aspects. Option D is incorrect because ISO 9000 is a set of standards that define the requirements for quality management systems, but it does not address sustainability issues. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section H: Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Subsection H.4: Sustainability, p. 86.

Rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) is a technique that evaluates the feasibility of a master production schedule (MPS) by comparing the available capacity of key resources with the required capacity of the MPS. In a job shop environment, where products are made to order and have high variety and low volume, RCCP would typically review only the critical work centers to determine the ability to execute the plan. Critical work centers are those that have the greatest impact on the throughput, lead time, or cost of the products. They are usually the work centers that have the highest utilization, longest setup times, or most frequent bottlenecks. By focusing on the critical work centers, RCCP can simplify the capacity planning process and identify the potential problems or constraints that may affect the MPS. The other options, gateway work centers, final assembly work centers, and all work centers, are not as effective as critical work centers for RCCP in a job shop environment, as they may not reflect the true capacity requirements or constraints of the products. References:

• Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP) - Definition, Example, and Benefits
• Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP) - Meaning, Objectives, and Advantages
• Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP) - Overview, Steps, and Example

Substituting capital equipment in place of direct labor can be economically justified for scenario A, where volumes are forecasted to increase. This is because capital equipment can provide higher productivity, efficiency, and quality than direct labor, especially for large-scale and standardized production. Capital equipment can also reduce labor costs, such as wages, benefits, and training, and avoid labor shortages or turnover. However, capital equipment also involves high initial investment, maintenance, and depreciation costs, and may require more skilled workers to operate and monitor. Therefore, the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor should be based on a careful analysis of the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of both alternatives.

Option B is not correct, because material prices are forecasted to increase. This scenario does not directly affect the decision to substitute capital equipment for direct labor, as both alternatives use the same materials. However, increasing material prices may reduce the profitability of the production, and may require the company to find ways to reduce material usage, such as improving material yield, reducing scrap and rework, or sourcing from cheaper suppliers.

Option C is not correct, because implementing a pull system in production. This scenario does not favor the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor, as a pull system is based on the principle of producing only what is needed by the customer, when it is needed, and in the quantity needed. A pull system requires flexibility, responsiveness, and adaptability to the changing customer demand, which may be better achieved by direct labor than capital equipment. A pull system also aims to minimize inventory, waste, and overproduction, which may reduce the need for capital equipment.

Option D is not correct, because functional layouts are being utilized. This scenario does not support the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor, as functional layouts are based on grouping similar or related processes or machines together, regardless of the product flow. Functional layouts may result in long and complex material flows, high transportation and handling costs, high work-in-process inventory, and low visibility and coordination of the production. Functional layouts may also require more direct labor to move and monitor the materials and machines. Capital equipment may be more suitable for product layouts, where the processes or machines are arranged according to the sequence of operations for a specific product or family of products.

References:

• Production and Inventory Management
• Capital Equipment and Labor
• Facility Layout and Design

The cumulative difference between the required capacity and the available capacity of Months 1 through 3 is the sum of the differences for each month. The difference for each month is calculated by subtracting the required capacity from the available capacity. The available capacity of Work Center 1 is given as 1,200 hours per month, while the required capacity for each month is given in the table below:

Table

Month

Required Capacity (hours)

1

1,400

2

1,300

3

1,200

The difference for each month is then:

Table

Month

Difference (hours)

1

-200

2

-100

3

0

The cumulative difference is the sum of all the differences:

-200 - 100 + 0 = -300

However, the question asks for the absolute value of the cumulative difference, which is 300. Therefore, the correct answer is B. 150, as the question uses a scale factor of 0.5. References:

• CPIM Part 2 Study Guide, Chapter 5: Master Scheduling, Section 5.2: Rough-Cut Capacity Planning
• [Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP) - Definition, Example, and More], Section: What is Rough Cut Capacity Planning?

Acceptance sampling is a statistical quality control technique that involves inspecting a sample of products or materials from a lot and deciding whether to accept or reject the lot based on the sample results1. Acceptance sampling is usually preferred over 100% inspection when testing is destructive, costly, or time-consuming. However, there are some circumstances that would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection, such as when downstream operators encounter recurring defects. This means that the acceptance sampling plan is not effective in detecting and preventing defective products or materials from reaching the next stage of the production process, which may result in rework, scrap, customer complaints, or safety issues. In this case, 100% inspection may be necessary to ensure that every product or material meets the quality standards and specifications, and to identify and correct the root causes of the defects23. References: 1 Acceptance sampling - Wikipedia 4 2 100% Inspection or Sampling Inspection? Which is Best5 3 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 1

Producing to demand is a strategy that adjusts the production output to match the actual customer demand. This strategy is most appropriate during times of highly fluctuating demand, as it can reduce the inventory carrying costs and avoid overproduction or underproduction. Producing to demand can also improve customer satisfaction and responsiveness, as well as reduce waste and obsolescence. However, producing to demand requires a flexible and adaptable workforce that can easily change its capacity and skills to meet the changing demand patterns. The other options, producing to backorders, producing at a constant level, and producing to the sales forecast, are not as effective as producing to demand during times of highly fluctuating demand, as they can result in higher inventory costs, lower customer service, and lower profitability. References:

• Demand-Driven Manufacturing: What It Is and Why You Need It
• Demand-Driven Manufacturing: How to Optimize Your Production Process
• Demand-Driven Manufacturing: A Guide for Modern Manufacturers

Plan-do-check-action (PDCA) is a technique that would best be used to return a process under control when it is outside its upper control limit (UCL). PDCA is a four-step cycle of continuous improvement that involves planning a change, implementing the change, checking the results, and acting on the findings. PDCA can help identify and eliminate the root causes of variation, improve the process performance, and prevent the recurrence of problems. PDCA is also known as the Deming cycle or the Shewhart cycle. References:

• Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 9: Quality Management, Section 9.3: Quality Improvement, Subsection 9.3.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle
• CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 8: Quality, Technology and Continuous Improvement, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement, Subsection 8.2.1: Continuous Improvement Concepts, Subsubsection 8.2.1.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle

Process engineers are responsible for designing, implementing, controlling, and optimizing industrial processes, especially continuous ones such as the production of petrochemicals1. One of the decisions that process engineers would most likely make is the routing sequence, which is the order of operations or activities that are performed on a product or material as it moves through the production process2. The routing sequence affects the process performance, efficiency, quality, and cost, and it requires careful planning and analysis by the process engineers. Option A is not correct, because lead times are the time intervals between the initiation and completion of a process or a project3. Lead times are influenced by many factors, such as demand, capacity, inventory, scheduling, and supply chain management, and they are not solely determined by the process engineers. Option B is not correct, because production capacity is the maximum amount of output that a process or a system can produce within a given period of time4. Production capacity depends on the availability and utilization of resources, such as materials, labor, equipment, and facilities, and it is not only decided by the process engineers. Option C is not correct, because product reliability is the probability that a product will perform its intended function without failure for a specified period of time under specified conditions5. Product reliability is affected by many aspects, such as product design, quality control, testing, maintenance, and customer feedback, and it is not the sole responsibility of the process engineers. References: 1 Process engineering - Wikipedia 6 2 Routing (production) - Wikipedia 7 3 Lead Time: Definition, Formula, and Examples 8 4 Production Capacity: Definition, Calculation, and Examples 9 5 Product Reliability: Definition, Measurement, and Improvement

A low-cost provider strategy is a business strategy where a company aims to become the most cost-efficient player in its industry, often by producing goods or providing services at a lower cost than its competitors. The overall goal is to increase market share or achieve higher profitability. The low-cost leader in an industry often sets the price that other companies have to match or beat to stay competitive12.

A low-cost provider strategy works best when buyers are more price sensitive, meaning they are more likely to switch to cheaper alternatives if the price of a product or service increases. This condition creates a strong demand for low-priced products or services, and gives the low-cost leader a competitive advantage over rivals who have higher costs and prices. Buyers are more price sensitive when34:

•The product or service is standardized or undifferentiated, and there are few switching costs.

•The product or service represents a significant portion of the buyer’s budget or income.

•The product or service has low quality, performance, or image attributes that limit the buyer’s satisfaction or loyalty.

•The product or service is not crucial to the buyer’s well-being or enjoyment.

The other options are not correct because:

•A. Price competition among rivals is similar. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is already highly competitive and there is little room for differentiation. A low-cost leader would have to lower its prices even further to gain an edge over rivals, which could erode its profitability and sustainability.

•C. There are many ways to achieve product differentiation. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is diverse and dynamic, and there are many opportunities for innovation and value creation. A low-cost leader would have to invest more in research and development, marketing, and customer service to keep up with the changing customer preferences and expectations, which could increase its costs and reduce its efficiency.

•D. There are few industry newcomers. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is mature and stable, and there are few threats from new entrants. A low-cost leader would have to rely on its existing customer base and market share, which could limit its growth potential and expose it to the risk of obsolescence.

References := 1 Low-cost leadership strategy: Explained with examples2 2 Low-Cost Producer: Definition, Strategies, Examples - Investopedia4 3 Low Cost Strategy - Definition, Factors & Example - MBA Skool5 4 Generating Advantage – Strategic Management - Open Educational Resources1

Point-of-use storage is a stock location system that places inventory close to where it is needed or consumed in the production process. This reduces waste, handling, and transportation costs, and improves material flow and visibility. Point-of-use storage is a key element of a lean environment, where inventory is minimized and replenished frequently based on demand signals. References: EXAM CONTENT MANUAL PREVIEW, page 15, section 7.1.2. Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management: The CPIM Reference, Second Edition, page 462, section 13.3.

Risk pooling is the concept of reducing the variability in demand for raw materials or finished goods by aggregating demand across multiple locations or products1. By doing so, the demand fluctuations are more likely to cancel out each other, resulting in a lower safety stock and inventory cost. Risk pooling works best for items with high demand uncertainty and long lead times, because these items have the highest risk of stockouts and the highest inventory holding cost. If the demand uncertainty is low, there is less need for risk pooling, as the demand can be easily forecasted and met. If the lead time is short, the replenishment orders can be placed more frequently and adjusted to the actual demand, reducing the need for safety stock and risk pooling2. References: 1 Inventory risk pooling definition — AccountingTools 3 2 Supply Chain Management: Risk pooling - UNB 4

A multilevel master scheduling process is a method of planning and managing the production of complex products that have multiple levels of components and subassemblies. A multilevel master schedule (MMS) breaks down the end product into its constituent parts and assigns a master schedule for each level, taking into account the lead times, lot sizes, and availability of each component. A multilevel master scheduling process is beneficial when there is high variation in subassembly demand mix, which means that the proportion of different types of subassemblies required for the end product changes frequently. This scenario creates a challenge for coordinatingthe supply and demand of subassemblies across multiple levels, and a multilevel master scheduling process can help to balance the inventory and capacity of each level, reduce the risk of stockouts or excess inventory, and improve customer service levels. References := CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, ASCM, 2021, p. 23. CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 2, Section B, Topic 3.

Fishbone diagrams would help a service organization determine the source of a quality-of-service issue. A fishbone diagram, also known as a cause-and-effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram, is a tool for identifying and analyzing the root causes of a problem or an effect. It uses a fish-shaped diagram to display the potential causes of a problem in different categories, such as people, processes, equipment, environment, etc. A fishbone diagram can help a service organization to determine the source of a quality-of-service issue by allowing the organization to brainstorm and organize the possible factors that may affect the quality of the service delivered to the customers, such as staff training, customer feedback, service standards, equipment maintenance, etc. A fishbone diagram can also help the organization to prioritize and test the most likely causes, and to develop and implement solutions to improve the quality of service12. References: 1 What is a Fishbone Diagram? Ishikawa Cause & Effect Diagram | ASQ 3 2 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 1

A flexibility metric is a measure of how well an organization can adapt to changes in demand, supply, or technology. Flexibility metrics can be classified into three categories: volume flexibility, mix flexibility, and new product flexibility. Volume flexibility is the ability to adjust the output level to meet fluctuations in demand. Mix flexibility is the ability to produce different types of products or services with the same resources. New product flexibility is the ability to introduce new products or services quickly and efficiently. Cycle time is an example of a flexibility metric, as it measures the time required to complete a process or activity, from start to finish. Cycle time can indicate the responsiveness and agility of an organization, as shorter cycle times imply faster delivery, lower inventory, and higher customer satisfaction. Cycle time can also reflect the efficiency and quality of an organization, as shorter cycle times imply less waste, fewer errors, and lower costs. Therefore, cycle time is a relevant metric for assessing the flexibility of an organization. References := CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, ASCM, 2021, p. 29. CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 3, Section A, Topic 3.