AD0-E906 Practice Exam Questions with Answers Adobe Workfront for Experience Manager enhanced connector Expert Certification

When configuring theWorkfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connectorto version files correctly in AEM, the following criteria must be met:

Same Name: The new version of the file must have the exact same name as the current version. This ensures that AEM recognizes the file as a new version of an existing asset rather than a completely new asset.

Same Location: The new version must be sent to thesame locationin AEM as the current version. If the file is uploaded to a different location, AEM will not recognize it as a version of the existing asset.

Option B (appending version numbers) is not required for versioning in AEM, as versioning is handled internally based on the file’s name and location. Option C (same metadata) is not necessary for versioning but could be relevant for other workflows or metadata synchronization.

Refer toAEM Enhanced Connector documentationfor detailed instructions on configuring versioning and asset management between Workfront and AEM.

If themulti-value text fieldis being populated unexpectedly, the most likely cause is thatanother field in the metadata schema is mapped to the same property. When multiple fields are mapped to the same property in AEM, any updates to either field will overwrite or modify the property, leading to the unexpected population of values.

This can happen due to schema misconfiguration, where fields unintentionally share the same JCR property path.

Option B is incorrect because the value being required would not cause it to be populated automatically. Option C suggests simultaneous updates by different users, which is unlikely to cause the issue described.

Check themetadata schema configurationto ensure fields are mapped to distinct properties.

In Workfront, the best way to ensure that all documents within a project are shared with a designated team is toshare the entire project. By sharing the project, all documents and related assets within that project are automatically made available to the designated team members according to the project's access permissions.

Option C is incorrect because sharing one document does not automatically inherit the same access levels for the other documents. Option A suggests linking documents from AEM, but the question pertains to sharing documents within Workfront itself.

Refer to Workfront’sdocumentation on document sharingfor detailed instructions on how to share all project-related assets with teams.

When metadata mappings between Adobe Workfront and AEM are configured, the process of sending a document along with its metadata from Workfront to Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Assets is streamlined. The user selects the document in Workfront, clicks "Send to," and chooses the Experience Manager integration.

The metadata fields that have been mapped are automatically synchronized along with the document. There is no need for manual selection of metadata at this stage, as the integration ensures that all configured mappings are applied.

This functionality is part of the enhanced connector, which simplifies the workflow between Workfront and AEM Assets by automating the synchronization of mapped metadata fields during the document transfer.

For more details, refer to Adobe's documentation onWorkfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connector, which outlines how automatic metadata synchronization works during document transfers.

In the given scenario, the developer needs to execute a Maven profile specifically for theCloud Manager deployment pipeline. This requires the use of a property that is exclusive to Cloud Manager, allowing the profile to activate only when the build is being executed in the Cloud Manager environment.

Option C uses the correct activation property:

env.cloudmanager

This property is specific to Adobe's Cloud Manager environment, ensuring that this Maven profile will only be activated during Cloud Manager deployments. This allows the local deployment process to remain unaffected while the correct profile is triggered in Cloud Manager.

Options A and B use other properties (env.CM_BUILD or CM_BUILD) that are not standard or specific to the Cloud Manager environment, making them incorrect choices.

For more details, you can refer to Adobe’sCloud Manager Maven Configurationdocumentation, which outlines how to configure Maven profiles specifically for Cloud Manager's deployment pipelines.

In this scenario, the company is looking to group projects based on a benefit calculation from a custom form. The most efficient way to achieve this grouping and reporting structure in Adobe Workfront is by creating avalue expressionon the view. This method allows you to dynamically link the benefit value from the request object to other reporting structures, including the project object.

Value Expression on View:The value expression acts as a direct link between the custom form's calculated field and the reporting or view settings, enabling the system to pull the benefit value dynamically from the request.

Request Object Linking:By linking to the source request object through the value expression, it allows for seamless integration of calculated values into the project reporting view, ensuring that the benefit groups (Level 1-4) can be reported accurately based on the defined thresholds (0, 1-5, 6-10, 11-15).

This approach is more efficient compared to creating multiple calculated fields across different objects, and it allows for better maintainability and adaptability in future changes.

References from Adobe Workfront documentation emphasize the use ofvalue expressionsin reports and views for linking and utilizing calculated fields across different objects, enhancing the flexibility and power of custom reporting capabilities. Text mode is not necessary here because it is primarily used for custom formatting or more advanced use cases that don't involve simple value transfers between objects.

For more detailed information, you can refer to the official Workfront Help documentation onCustom FormsandAdvanced Reporting Techniquesin Adobe Workfront, where calculated fields and value expressions are thoroughly covered.

When configuring allowed HTTP request methods for /bin/workfront-tools on the AEM dispatcher, the safest and most appropriate methods to allow areGET, POST, and PUT. These methods cover the basic operations for retrieving data (GET), submitting data (POST), and updating data (PUT), which are typically required for the Enhanced Connector functionality.

GET: Used to retrieve data from the server.

POST: Used to send data to the server.

PUT: Used to update resources on the server.

Options A (DELETE) and B (HEAD, DELETE) are riskier and less commonly needed for this use case, and DELETE should be restricted unless absolutely necessary to prevent unintended deletions.

Refer toAdobe documentation on Dispatcher securityfor best practices regarding allowed HTTP methods.

When configuring metadata mapping between Adobe Workfront custom form fields and Adobe Experience Manager metadata properties, you can useIssueandDocumentcustom forms to define these mappings. These types of forms are commonly used for tracking and managing work items and documents, both of which need to have their metadata synchronized between the two systems.

Issue custom forms: Used for tracking work requests, such as issues or tasks.

Document custom forms: Specifically used for managing metadata related to documents, which can be mapped directly to AEM assets.

Options C (Portfolio) and D (Program) are not typically used for metadata mapping related to assets or documents.

Refer toWorkfront Enhanced Connector documentationfor more information on mapping custom forms to AEM metadata properties.

In this case, the solutions consultant needs to limit thelegal team’s accessto read-only for all content in AEM. Since the legal team will be working in Workfront and accessing AEM via the enhanced connector, the best way to manage their access is to applyAccess Control Entries (ACEs)to the wf-workfront-users user group.

ACEsallow you to specify detailed permissions for a group or user in AEM, such as granting read-only access to specific resources or folders within the DAM.

Options A and C would either grant too much access (as in the case of the Everyone user group) or allow contributions, which is beyond the requirement of just reading access.

Refer toAEM Access Control Management documentationto learn more about setting up ACEs and managing permissions.

In AEM, to limit the number of concurrent workflows running at the same time, you need to adjust theMaximum Parallel Jobssetting in the OSGI console. This setting controls how many workflow jobs can be processed simultaneously, and reducing this number will lower the load on the server by limiting the number of workflows that can run concurrently.

This setting can be found under theDay CQ Workflow - Workflow Engineconfiguration in the OSGI Web Console.

Options B and C refer to specific workflows and threads, but they do not directly address the overall system limit on concurrent workflow executions.

Refer to theAEM documentation on workflow scaling and performancefor more information on how to adjust these settings in the OSGI configuration.

To motivate Marketing to endorse a single Workfront instance across the enterprise, the best first step is to initiateExecutive/Stakeholder Engagement. By getting senior leadership or key stakeholders from both the legal and marketing departments involved, it helps align the goals of the organization and illustrates the value of a unified system.

Executive engagementcan help overcome resistance from individual departments (such as Marketing) by emphasizing the strategic importance of having a centralized system and showcasing the benefits for the entire organization.

Options A (training on group admin functions) and B (demo tailored for multiple groups) are useful but would not be as impactful as engaging executives to drive the initiative from the top down.

Refer toWorkfront’s adoption and implementation strategiesfor more information on how to engage stakeholders effectively.