Practice Free CCCS-203b CrowdStrike Certified Cloud Specialist Exam Questions Answers With Explanation

Visibility intoAWS IAM controls, includingrestricted use of AWS CloudShell (CIS IAM 1.20), is provided throughCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security posture managementusingIndicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs). These checks continuously evaluate cloud resources againstindustry-standard benchmarks, including theCIS Foundations Benchmarks for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.

CrowdStrike maintainsprebuilt, managed IOM policiesthat are automatically updated to reflect the latest CIS guidance. Leveraging existing IOM policies ensures immediate coverage without the operational risk or overhead of creating and maintaining custom rules. These policies assess IAM configurations, permissions usage, service access controls, and policy enforcement related to CloudShell usage.

IOAs are designed for runtime behavioral detections and are not suitable for posture or configuration validation. Creating custom IOMs is unnecessary for CIS-aligned controls because CrowdStrike already provides validated, benchmark-mapped policies maintained by CrowdStrike security research.

Therefore,leveraging existing IOM policiesis the correct and recommended approach to maintaincontinuous, benchmark-aligned visibilityacross multi-cloud environments.

When registering an AWS account with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, enabling real-time visibility and detection is recommended to improve overall security posture. This ensures continuous monitoring of cloud activity, identities, and resources rather than relying solely on periodic posture assessments.

Real-time detection allows Falcon to identify risky behavior, misconfigurations, and attack techniques as they occur, reducing dwell time and improving response effectiveness. The other options are not registration-specific security enhancements within Falcon.

Therefore, the correct answer is Real-time visibility and detection.

InCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, the most efficient and direct way to identify whichcontainer and Kubernetes podare responsible for suspicious outbound traffic is by usingNetwork Eventsand filtering on theremote (destination) port.

When a container initiates outbound network communication, thedestination portrepresents the service being contacted externally. Since the alert specifically referencesdestination port 1337, filteringNetwork Eventsforremote port 1337immediately surfaces the relevant telemetry. Falcon automatically enriches these events withcontainer ID, container name, Kubernetes pod name, namespace, node, and cluster context, allowing rapid attribution.

UsingAdvanced Event Searchis technically possible but less efficient, as it requires manual query construction and does not provide the same streamlined Kubernetes-focused workflow as Network Events. Reviewing dashboards alone is insufficient for precise attribution and forensic analysis.

Filtering onlocal port 1337would be incorrect in this scenario, as it would only identify processes listening locally rather than outbound connections sourcing from the container.

Therefore,Option Cis correct because it aligns with Falcon Cloud Security’s design forcontainer-aware network telemetry, providing the fastest and most accurate path to identifying the originating container and pod.

InCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, configuration policy breaches aligned to regulatory and security frameworks such asNISTare tracked asIndicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs). These findings represent deviations from best-practice configurations and compliance benchmarks.

To provide an auditable list of NIST-related configuration violations, the correct location isExport Cloud Posture – Indicators of misconfiguration. This export includes detailed records of misconfigured resources, associated benchmarks (NIST, CIS, etc.), affected cloud accounts, severity, and remediation guidance. It is specifically designed to support internal and external audit requirements.

Cloud Indicators of Attack focus on threat activity, not compliance. Remediation status reports focus on fix progress rather than raw policy violations. The Cloud Posture dashboard provides a high-level summary but does not deliver the detailed, exportable list required for audits.

Therefore,Export Cloud Posture – Indicators of misconfigurationis the correct and documented source.

A primary benefit of CrowdStrike’s cloud security suite is that it provides a comprehensive security posture by integrating visibility and prevention across cloud workloads, identities, containers, and control planes.

Falcon Cloud Security unifies CSPM, workload protection, container security, identity protection, and detection and response into a single platform. This integration allows organizations to detect misconfigurations, prevent risky deployments, monitor runtime activity, and respond to threats using shared context and intelligence.

Other options describe isolated capabilities or services that are not the core value proposition of the platform. Therefore, the correct answer is Provides a comprehensive security posture by integrating visibility and prevention.

To identifyremediable vulnerabilities in running containers, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security recommends filteringimage vulnerabilities by container running status and remediation. This approach correlates container runtime state with image assessment results, allowing security teams to focus on vulnerabilities that are bothpresent in images and actively impacting running workloads.

Image vulnerability findings include remediation metadata such as fixed versions, patch availability, and upgrade paths. By filtering oncontainer running status, you ensure that attention is limited to vulnerabilities that pose immediate risk rather than those in dormant or unused images. Adding theremediation filterfurther refines results to show only vulnerabilities that can realistically be addressed, helping teams prioritize efficiently.

Other options are incorrect because container assets and detections focus on runtime behavior, not vulnerability remediation context. Image detections relate to malware or suspicious artifacts, not CVEs.

This filtering method aligns with CrowdStrike best practices for vulnerability prioritization by combiningruntime relevance and remediation feasibility, making optionCthe correct answer.

In CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, exclusions for cloud scans are designed to be precise and scalable so that organizations can safely reduce noise without weakening overall security coverage. According to CrowdStrike best practices,tagsare the recommended and supported criterion for creating cloud scan exclusions.

Tags are metadata labels applied to cloud resources (such as AWS accounts, instances, or services) and are commonly used for ownership, environment classification (for example, dev, test, or prod), or application grouping. By using tags as exclusion criteria, security teams can dynamically control which resources are excluded from scans without relying on static identifiers. This is especially important in cloud environments where resources are frequently created, modified, or terminated.

Exclusions based onaccounts,regions, orservicesare broader in scope and can unintentionally exclude large portions of the environment, increasing the risk of blind spots. Tag-based exclusions allow CrowdStrike Falcon to maintain least-privilege security principles by excluding only explicitly labeled resources.

Because Falcon continuously evaluates cloud resources, tag-based exclusions automatically apply to newly created assets that inherit the same tag, ensuring consistent policy enforcement. For these reasons, CrowdStrike documentation and operational guidance identifyTagas the correct and most effective criterion for creating cloud scan exclusions.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security supportsscheduled reportingas the preferred mechanism for automatically distributing security findings to stakeholders who may not have direct access to the Falcon console. When container vulnerabilities need to be reviewed on aweekly basis, the correct and most operationally efficient approach is tocreate a scheduled report covering the last 7 days.

Scheduled reports can be configured to run automatically and delivered via email to designated recipients, including users without Falcon console access. This makes them ideal for cross-functional teams, auditors, or management who require regular visibility into container risk without interactive access.

UsingAdvanced Event Searchrequires console access and manual execution, which does not meet the requirement for automatic distribution. Dashboards also require console access and cannot be securely shared externally. A 24-hour report would not align with the stated weekly review cadence and could result in incomplete visibility.

CrowdStrike documentation and best practices recommend scheduled reports for recurring compliance, vulnerability, and risk reporting use cases. Therefore, the correct solution is tocreate a scheduled report to list vulnerable container data from the last 7 days.

Cloud Groups in CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security are designed to logically segment cloud resources so users can focus only on what is relevant to their role or responsibility. The primary way cloud groups reduce noise is bynarrowing a user’s scope of analysis through filtered cloud resources.

By grouping resources based on criteria such as account, region, service, or tags, Cloud Groups ensure that analysts and responders only see findings related to the resources they own or manage. This minimizes alert fatigue, reduces unnecessary exposure to unrelated findings, and improves investigation efficiency.

Cloud Groups do not assign permissions directly; permissions are managed through Falcon RBAC roles. They also do not primarily function as exclusion mechanisms—although exclusions may be applied, their core purpose is scoping and contextualization.

CrowdStrike best practices emphasize Cloud Groups as a way to align security visibility with organizational structure, enabling teams to operate more efficiently and responsibly. Therefore, the correct answer isNarrow a user’s scope of analysis by filtering cloud resources.

The secure and recommended way to test whether firewall restrictions are causing CSPM operation failures is to verify that the required CrowdStrike IP addresses are allowlisted. Falcon Cloud Security relies on outbound API communication between CrowdStrike and the cloud provider. If firewall rules block this traffic, asset inventory collection and IOM detection can fail even though registration appears successful.

CrowdStrike publishes a list of IP addresses and endpoints that must be permitted for proper operation. Validating firewall allowlists against this documentation is a low-risk, best-practice troubleshooting step that preserves security controls while testing connectivity assumptions.

Temporarily opening firewalls to all inbound traffic is insecure and strongly discouraged. Dismissing firewall-related causes without validation can delay resolution. Therefore, the correct and secure approach is to check that the CrowdStrike IP addresses are allowlisted.

InFalcon Cloud Security, prevention actions are triggered whenall configured enforcement criteriawithin a policy are met. When customizing theGKE Autopilot policy, enforcement requires alignment across vulnerability intelligence, detection severity, and compliance context.

By setting:

Vulnerability ExPRT.ai severity = Critical

Detection severity = Critical

Detection type = CIS benchmark deviation

you ensure that bothrisk-based vulnerability intelligenceandcompliance deviation severitythresholds are satisfied. This combination confirms that the issue is not only severe but also represents a critical deviation from an accepted security benchmark, justifying prevention.

Omitting the detection type or replacing it with image misconfiguration alone does not meet the enforcement logic required for policy-triggered prevention.

Therefore,Option Cis the correct combination that triggers prevention.

A commoncloud-conscious attacker techniqueused to remain hidden in a compromised environment isdisabling CloudTrail logging. AWS CloudTrail records API activity across an account, providing critical visibility into actions taken by users, roles, and services. By disabling or tampering with CloudTrail, attackers significantly reduce the likelihood of detection.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security classifies this behavior as a high-risk indicator because it directly impacts monitoring, forensics, and incident response. Without CloudTrail logs, security teams lose audit trails that are essential for identifying malicious actions such as privilege escalation, data exfiltration, or persistence mechanisms.

Other options represent misconfigurations or changes that may increase exposure but do not directly suppress visibility. For example, modifying storage networking or security groups increases attack surface, while adding certificates may support persistence—but none are as directly linked to stealth as disabling logging.

Therefore,CloudTrail logging disabledis the correct answer and a well-documented cloud attack tactic used to evade detection.