HPE6-A47 Practice Exam Questions with Answers Designing Aruba Solutions Certification

A customer who has an Instant AP deployment and needs to provide client-to-site VPN access for remote users would benefit from adding a controller to the deployment. A controller can act as a VPN concentrator that terminates the VPN tunnels from the remote clients and provides secure access to the corporate network. The controller can also apply firewall policies and role-based access control to the VPN traffic. An Instant AP deployment alone cannot provide this functionality, as it only supports site-to-site VPN between Instant AP clusters12. The other options do not require a controller, as they can be achieved with an Instant AP deployment. An Instant AP deployment can apply role-based firewall policies using the built-in stateful firewall on each Instant AP3. An Instant AP deployment can also provide a captive portal for guests using the internal orexternal web server options4. An Instant AP deployment can be managed by a cloud-based solution such as Aruba Central, which does not require a controller5. References:

• 1: Understanding IAP-VPN Architecture - Aruba
• 2: Configuring IAP-VPN - Aruba
• 3: Firewall Roles and Policies - Aruba
• 4: Configuring Captive Portal - Aruba
• 5: Managing Instant AP from Aruba Central - Aruba

The customer needs to upgrade their wireless network, which has a single large building with four floors. The customer requires 30 APs on each floor, totaling 120 APs for the whole building. The customer also wants to use a MM-based architecture, and deployone Aruba 7030 MC on each floor, with the MCs combined in a cluster for seamless client failover and roaming. However, the proposed solution does not meet the customer’s requirements, because the Aruba 7030 MC does not support enough APs for the customer’s needs. Each Aruba 7030 MC can only support up to 64 APs, which means that deploying one on each floor would not be enough to support all the required APs. The architect should explain this limitation to the customer, and suggest a different solution that can support more APs, such as using a higher-capacity MC model, or deploying more MCs per floor.

References:

• Aruba 7000 Series Mobility Controllers Data Sheet)
• ArubaOS 8.5 User Guide)
• Aruba Certified Design Professional Official Certification Study Guide (HPE6-A47))

The Virtual Switching Framework (VSF) is a technology that allows two or more Aruba switches to operate as a single logical device, providing high availability, simplified management, and increased performance. VSF is supported on Aruba 5400R zl2 switches, which are modular switches that can accommodate different types of line cards and power supplies1.

The VSF fabric requires two types of connections between the member switches: VSF links and VSF ports. VSF links are the physical connections that carry the VSF control and data traffic, while VSF ports are the logical interfaces that bundle the VSF links into a single logical link. VSF links can be either 10 GbE or 40 GbE, and VSF ports can be either 10 GbE or 40 GbE1.

To create a VSF fabric with two 5406R zl2 switches, the architect needs to ensure that the switches have the compatible modules, transceivers, and cables for the VSF links and ports. According to the ArubaOS-Switch Management and Configuration Guide1, the following requirements apply for the VSF fabric:

• The switches must have the same chassis model, the same number and type of modules, and the same firmware version.
• The switches must have at least one v3 module in slot A or B. The v3 modules are the ones with the letter “M” in the part number, such as J9990A, J9991A, and J9992A. The v2 modules are the ones with the letter “A” in the part number, such as J9534A, J9535A, and J9536A.
• The switches must have the same type of transceivers and cables for the VSF links. The supported transceivers are the Aruba 10G SFP+ LC SR, the Aruba 10G SFP+ LC LR, the Aruba 40G QSFP+ LC SR4, and the Aruba 40G QSFP+ MPO SR4. The supported cables are the Aruba 10G SFP+ to SFP+ 1m DAC Cable, the Aruba 10G SFP+ to SFP+ 3m DAC Cable, the Aruba 40G QSFP+ to QSFP+ 1m DAC Cable, and the Aruba 40G QSFP+ to QSFP+ 3m DAC Cable.

Based on the exhibit, the architect has planned to use the Aruba 40G QSFP+ to QSFP+ 1m DAC Cable (JH234A) for the VSF links, which is a supported option. However, the architect has also selected the Aruba 24p 10GBASE-T v2 zl Module (J9536A) and the Aruba 20p 10GbE SFP+ v2 zl Module (J9535A) for the switches, which are not compatible with the VSF fabric. The architect should change these v2 modules to v3 modules, such as the Aruba 24p 10GBASE-T v3 zl2 Module (J9996A) and the Aruba 20p 10GbE SFP+ v3 zl2 Module (J9990A), to meet the VSF requirements.

The other options are not issues with the plan. Adding two QSPF+ MP0 SR4 transceivers (A) is not necessary, as the DAC cable already provides the 40 GbE connection for the VSF links. Adding stacking modules and cables © is not required, as the VSF fabric does not use the traditional stacking technology. Changing the power supply type (D) is not relevant, as the VSF fabric does not impose any restrictions on the power supply type.

References: 1: ArubaOS-Switch Management and Configuration Guide - Aruba, Chapter 12: Virtual Switching Framework, pages 219-227.

the new 802.11ac deployment should have a capacity-based design for the best performance, but the existing deployment sounds like a coverage-based design. This is because a capacity-based design takes into account the number and type of clients, the applications they use, and the bandwidth they require. A coverage-based design only considers the signal strength and the absence of coverage holes. A site survey is desirable to determine the optimal locations for the new APs because it can help the architect to assess the current and future capacity needs, identify the sources of interference and noise, and optimize the channel and power settings for the new APs.

Option A is incorrect because an 802.11ac deployment does not necessarily work better with side-mounted APs. The mounting location of the APs depends on the antenna type, the ceiling height, and the RF environment.

Option C is incorrect because 802.11ac AP radios are not more sensitive to 2.4 GHz interference than 802.11n APs. In fact, 802.11ac APs operate in the 5 GHz band, which is less crowded and prone to interference than the 2.4 GHz band.

Option D is incorrect because 802.11ac APs cannot support a higher density of clients by being deployed farther apart. On the contrary, 802.11ac APs need to be deployed closer together to provide the higher data rates and throughput that 802.11ac clients expect.

References: The information can be referenced from the official HPE documents and learning materials available on HPE Press and Aruba Networks. Specifically, it aligns with the objectives outlined in Chapter 4: Wireless LAN Design, where the capacity-based design and site survey methods are discussed. Designing Aruba Solutions Official Certification Study Guide Aruba Mobility Fundamentals Guide

In a high-client device turnover environment like an airport, the network management and monitoring solution needs to handle a large number of devices connecting and disconnecting frequently. This can put a significant load on the system. Therefore, it would be beneficial to recommend additional hardware resources beyond those typically recommended for the AirWare platform. This would ensure that the system can handle the high turnover and provide reliable service1.

References:

• Solution Architect - Scaled Agile Framework

The Aruba 2930F Switch Series is a stackable Layer 3 switch series that provides performance and ease of use for enterprises, small and medium-sized businesses, and branch office networks1. It comes with an enterprise-grade feature set that includes static and RIP routing, IPv6, ACLs, robust security, and QoS1. The 2930F Series supports more options for class-based Quality of Service (QoS) policies than the 2540 Series2. This feature is crucial for a customer who needs a wired network solution that can recognize and prioritize a wide array of different types of traffic, including casual Web browsing, voice, video, SAP Online, and file sharing.

References:

• HPE Aruba Networking 2930F Switch Series
• Why would the architect choose the 2930F rather than the 2540 Switch Series for this customer?

The correct answer is option C, 20-25. This is because a general rule of thumb for 802.11ac wireless deployment is to have one AP for every 200 square meters (approximately 2,000 square feet) of coverage area. This assumes a moderate user density and application demand. Therefore, for a coverage area of 4,645 square meters (approximately 50,000 square feet), the architect should have in mind about 23 APs (4,645 / 200 = 23.225). This number can be adjusted based on the actual site survey and VisualRF plan, but it serves as a good starting point. References: The information can be referenced from the official HPE documents and learning materials available on HPE Press and Aruba Networks. Specifically, it aligns with the objectives outlined in Chapter 4: Wireless LAN Design, where the AP count estimation and site survey methods are discussed. Designing Aruba Solutions Official Certification Study Guide Aruba Mobility Fundamentals Guide

This answer is correct because it matches the scenario for which the Aruba backplane stacking technology is designed. Aruba backplane stacking technology allows up to 10 switches to be interconnected using high-speed backplane cables, creating a single logical device with a single IP address and configuration. This simplifies the management and operation of the network, as well as the redundancy design, as the stack can operate in ring or chain topology and provide fast failover in case of link or switch failure. This technology is suitable for customers who need to deploy a pair of aggregation switches in the same closet, as it reduces the number of devices and links to manage, and provides high availability and scalability for the network.

The other options are incorrect because:

• B. The customer needs to simplify the deployment of core switches which are located in different closets for redundancy purposes. This scenario is not suitable for Aruba backplane stacking technology, as it requires the switches to be physically close to each other and connected with backplane cables. A better option for this scenario would be to use Aruba Virtual Switching Framework (VSF) technology, which allows up to twoswitches to be interconnected using standard Ethernet links, creating a virtual switch that can span across different closets or racks.
• C. The customer needs to expand the network and make it possible for the current core switches to support more MAC forwarding and ARP entries. This scenario is not suitable for Aruba backplane stacking technology, as it does not increase the MAC or ARP table size of the switches. The MAC and ARP table size is determined by the hardware specifications of each switch model, and stacking them together does not change that. A better option for this scenario would be to upgrade the core switches to a higher-end model that supports more MAC and ARP entries, or to segment the network into smaller subnets to reduce the MAC and ARP traffic.
• D. The customer needs to deploy a switch at a branch office and have the switch automatically discover and join the network stack at the main office. This scenario is not suitable for Aruba backplane stacking technology, as it requires the switches to be on the same LAN and connected with backplane cables. A better option for this scenario would be to use Aruba Central, which is a cloud-based management platform that allows remote provisioning and monitoring of Aruba switches and other devices. Aruba Central can automatically discover and join the switch to the network, and apply the configuration and policies from the main office.

References:

• Aruba 2930M Switch Series - Data sheet)
• ArubaOS-Switch Virtual Switching Framework - Configuration guide)
• Aruba Central - Data sheet)

The Aruba 7210 Mobility Controller is designed to support up to 512 APs and 16,384 simultaneous users. In contrast, the 7205 Mobility Controller supports up to 256 APs and 8,192 simultaneous users. Therefore, for a very high density (VHD) design with 128 APs supporting 12,800 devices, the 7210 controllers would be a better fit due to their higher capacity for APs and simultaneous users.

References:

• Designing Aruba Solutions, Rev. 20.11, Module 4: Aruba Mobility Controller Design, page 4-16
• 7200 Series Controller Data Sheet, page 1

This is a routed link, meaning you should only have one VLAN assigned to the link. Obvious since VLANs are terminated at a layer 3 boundary, but also right out of the curriculum.

References: The information can be referenced from the official HPE documents and learning materials available on HPE Press and Aruba Networks. Specifically, it aligns with the objectives outlined in Chapter 5: Wired Network Design, where the VSF and VLAN design considerations are discussed. Designing Aruba Solutions Official Certification Study Guide ArubaOS-Switch and ArubaOS-CX VSF Configuration Guide

According to the Aruba documentation, Aruba AirWare Clarity is a feature that proactively analyzes end-users’ quality of experience by providing enhanced monitoring capabilities for critical network services, such as time and response failures for a mobile device to associate with a Wi-Fi radio, authenticate to a RADIUS server, obtain an IP address through DHCP, and resolve names for DNS services. This gives IT staff end-to-end visibility into problems before they escalate as metrics are monitored in real-time, and also captured through on-demand or scheduled testing for predictive insight. By assessing the times for clients to obtain DHCP and DNS services, Clarity helps staff diagnose non-WiFi related issues that may affect the network performance and user experience.

References:

• Clarity - Aruba
• Clarity - Aruba

A wide sector directional antenna is a type of antenna that radiates or receives radio waves in a sector-shaped pattern, covering a wide angle of a circle. The width of the sector is determined by the horizontal beamwidth (H-plane) of the antenna, while the height of the sector is determined by the vertical beamwidth (E-plane) of the antenna12. A wide sector directional antenna is usually used to provide regional coverage for wireless networks, such as Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISP) or similar applications2.

According to the antenna specifications given, Antenna 3 has the widest horizontal beamwidth of 100 degrees, which means it can cover a large sector of a circle. Antenna 4 has a narrower horizontal beamwidth of 60 degrees, which means it can cover a smaller sector of a circle. Antenna 1 and Antenna 2 have a horizontal beamwidth of 360 degrees, which means they are omnidirectional antennas, not directional antennas. Therefore, Antenna 3 is the best choice for the plan that specifies wide sector directional antennas.

References:

• 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sector_antenna
• 2: https://lcantennas.com/directional-antennas/

To plan a wireless solution upgrade for printers, the architect needs to know whether the printers support 802.1X and the 802.11 standards supported by the printer. These two factors are important for ensuring the compatibility, security, and performance of the wireless network.

• 802.1X is a standard for network access control that provides authentication, authorization, and encryption for devices that connect to a wireless network1. It prevents unauthorized devices from accessing the network resources and protects the data transmission from eavesdropping or tampering. If the printers support 802.1X, the architect can design a wireless solution that leverages this feature to enhance the security and compliance of the network. If the printers do not support 802.1X, the architect may need to consider alternative methods of securing the wireless access, such as MAC address filtering, VPN, or WPA2-PSK2.
• 802.11 is a set of standards that define the specifications and protocols for wireless communication3. Different 802.11 standards have different characteristics, such as frequency, bandwidth, data rate, range, and compatibility. For example, 802.11a operates at 5 GHz and offers up to 54 Mbps, while 802.11b operates at 2.4 GHz and offers up to 11 Mbps3. If the printers support the same or higher 802.11 standards as the wireless network, the architect can design a wireless solution that ensures the optimal performance and reliability of the wireless communication. If the printers support lower or different 802.11 standards than the wireless network, the architect may need to consider the impact of the compatibility issues, such as interference, congestion, or degradation4.

The other options are not as relevant for planning a wireless solution upgrade for printers. Whether the printers are physically locked down or not does not affect the wireless connectivity, unless the lock interferes with the antenna or signal reception. The identity of users who need to access printers is more related to the access control and user management policies, rather than the wireless solution design. Whether the printers support PoE or not does not affect the wireless connectivity, unless the power source is unreliable or insufficient.

References:

• 1: https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_86_Web_Help/Content/arubaos-solutions/1-overview/802.1x.htm
• 2: https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_86_Web_Help/Content/arubaos-solutions/1-overview/securing-wireless-access.htm
• 3: https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_86_Web_Help/Content/arubaos-solutions/1-overview/802.11-standards.htm
• 4: https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/ArubaOS_86_Web_Help/Content/arubaos-solutions/1-overview/compatibility-issues.htm