Get IIA-CHAL-QISA Dumps : Verified Qualified Info Systems Auditor CIA Challenge Exam

The IIA Code of Ethics sets forth principles and expectations for ethical behavior in internal auditing, particularly regarding the communication of results.

Integrity and Transparency:According to the IIA Code of Ethics, internal auditors are expected to exhibit integrity and transparency in their reporting, ensuring that material facts are disclosed accurately to avoid misrepresentation.

According to the IIA's Standards, specifically Standard 1210 - Proficiency, internal auditors must possess the knowledge, skills, and other competencies needed to perform their individual responsibilities. If the internal audit activity lacks the necessary skill set to conduct a requested consulting engagement, the most appropriate action for the CAE is to decline the engagement request. This ensures that the internal audit activity does not compromise the quality and effectiveness of its services.

When conducting a review of an electronic data interchange (EDI) application provided by a third-party service, the internal auditor should ensure several key aspects to maintain security and compliance:

Independent Review of Service Provider: Determine whether an independent review of the service provider's operations has been conducted. This review helps ensure that the service provider meets necessary standards and maintains adequate controls.

Contractual Clauses: Verify that the service provider's contracts include necessary clauses. These clauses should cover aspects like data security, confidentiality, compliance with standards, and performance metrics.

Ensuring encryption keys meet ISO standards and verifying the use of public-switched data networks are important but are more specific technical controls that might be part of broader reviews. The focus here should be on independent verification and robust contractual agreements

?Non-Assurance Engagements: Non-assurance engagements focus on advisory and consulting services rather than providing an independent assessment. These engagements aim to add value by offering insights and recommendations to management.

?Objective Characteristics:

Informing Management: Providing information on potential risks and advising on risk management strategies is typical for non-assurance engagements. This helps management make informed decisions and manage risks effectively.

Assessment and Compliance: Options A, C, and D are more aligned with assurance engagements, where the internal audit activity provides an independent assessment or ensures compliance with policies and procedures.

?IIA Guidance:

Standard 2120 – Risk Management: Internal auditors must evaluate and contribute to the improvement of risk management processes, often through advisory services in non-assurance roles.

?References:

Non-assurance engagements focus on informing and advising management about risks, improvements, and strategic decisions, as exemplified by informing management about risks related to moving the data warehouse to a third-party cloud server????.

The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) provide guidance on the reporting requirements of the quality assurance and improvement program. According to Standard 1320, "The chief audit executive must communicate the results of the quality assurance and improvement program to senior management and the board." This communication must include the results of both internal and external assessments and ongoing monitoring. Specifically, the results of ongoing monitoring of the internal audit activity’s performance should be reported to senior management and the board at least annually. This ensures that the internal audit activity maintains its proficiency, enhances its effectiveness, and complies with the Standards.