CTFL-Foundation Practice Exam Questions with Answers ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Certification

Reporting discrepancies as incidents is part of the Test Implementation and Execution phase. During this phase, any deviations from expected results, bugs, or issues discovered are logged as incidents. These incidents are then managed and tracked until they are resolved. This phase is crucial for identifying and documenting problems that occur during the testing process??.

The other answers are incorrect because:

(ii) Walkthroughs do not require code and static analysis does require code.

(iv) Static techniques do not execute the code and therefore can be run before and after the code is ready for execution.

An independent test function in an organization helps improve defect finding during reviews and testing by providing an unbiased perspective on the software. Independent testers are not influenced by the development team’s constraints and can evaluate the software more objectively. This leads to the identification of defects that might be overlooked by developers who are too close to their own code. Independent testing enhances the quality and reliability of the software by bringing fresh insights and ensuring thorough testing??.

Incremental testing approaches involve testing components of the software in increments or steps, allowing for integration and testing of parts of the system progressively. According to the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, version 4.0, the common types of incremental testing approaches include:

Top-down: Testing starts from the top of the module hierarchy and progresses downwards.

Bottom-up: Testing begins with the lower-level modules and progresses upwards.

Functional incrementation: Adding and testing one function at a time.

Big-bang testing, however, is not an incremental approach. In big-bang testing, all components or modules are integrated simultaneously, and the system is tested as a whole. This approach does not allow for incremental testing and integration and is therefore not considered a type of incremental testing approach??.

Maintenance testing is typically triggered by changes to the operational system, such as data migration, system modification, or system retirement. These triggers require testing to ensure that the changes do not negatively impact the existing functionality. However, the introduction of a test management tool does not directly affect the operational system and is not considered a trigger for maintenance testing??.

An incident report typically includes the version(s) of the software under test, expected results and actual results, and precise steps to reproduce the problem. However, the test execution schedule is not a standard part of an incident report. It is more relevant to test planning and management documents rather than incident reporting??.

Testing is primarily aimed at detecting defects, verifying the functionality, and providing information to stakeholders for decision-making. While investigating defects is part of the testing process, fixing defects is not typically considered an objective of testing; it falls under the development activities. The main objectives of testing include preventing defects (through early testing activities), gaining confidence in the system, and providing valuable information to stakeholders??.

Equivalence Partitioning is a black box test design technique used to divide input data into partitions that are expected to be treated the same by the system. It focuses on ensuring that each partition represents a set of valid or invalid states for the input, and one test case from each partition is enough to cover the entire set. This technique does not rely on the internal structure of the code but rather on the functionality and behavior as seen from the user's perspective??.

During the test planning stage, it is important to assign resources for the planned activities. This ensures that the necessary personnel, equipment, and time are allocated to execute the test plan effectively. Analyzing the test basis, designing test environments, and writing a test execution schedule are activities that come after the initial planning and resource allocation??.

Common metrics used for monitoring test preparation and execution typically include quantitative measures such as the number of test cases passed and failed, the percentage of planned test cases designed, and the percentage of tasks completed in test environment preparation. These metrics provide insights into the progress and effectiveness of the testing process. However, the number of test plan review comments is not a typical metric for this purpose, as it does not directly measure the progress or quality of test execution??.

The testability of requirements is evaluated during the Test Analysis and Design stage of the fundamental test process. In this stage, the test team reviews the requirements to ensure they are clear, complete, and testable. The focus is on understanding the test basis and defining the test conditions, test cases, and test data necessary to verify the requirements??.

For a system with complex business rules and many branches, decision testing (a white-box technique) is appropriate because it ensures that each decision point (branch) in the code is tested. Equivalence partitioning (a black-box technique) complements this by ensuring that all functional areas (based ondifferent inputs) are adequately tested. This combination provides thorough coverage of both the internal logic and the functional requirements of the system??.

Providing support for the test team using the tool is crucial for successful deployment. This includes training the test team on how to effectively use the tool, offering ongoing support to address any issues, and integrating the tool into existing processes. By ensuring that the team is well-equipped and confident in using the tool, the organization can maximize the benefits of the tool and improve overall testing efficiency??.

Functional and structural testing can be applied at all test levels. Functional testing focuses on verifying that the software behaves as expected based on the requirements, while structural testing examines the internal structure and workings of the software. These testing approaches are complementary and can be used together at various stages of testing, including component, integration, system, and acceptance testing. Applying both types of tests ensures a comprehensive evaluation of the software's functionality and internal structure??.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Static analysis tools are designed to analyze code without executing it. They are particularly good at finding defects related to code structure, such as variables that are not used or improperly declared. These tools can parse the code and identify issues that may not be easily detected through dynamic testing methods. Other issues like omission of a major requirement (A), inadequate decision coverage (B), and component memory leakage (C) are typically found through dynamic testing or higher-level verification techniques?? .

The correct sequence in the causal chain is "Error, fault, failure". An error (or mistake) made by a person can lead to a fault (or defect) in the software. When the fault is executed, it may cause a failure in the software system. This sequence is important to understand the cause and effect relationship in software testing and defect management?? .

Static analysis tools are designed to analyze code without executing it. They are highly effective at identifying issues such as syntax errors, variable declaration, and usage problems. Options A, B, and D are types of defects that static analysis tools can typically detect because they relate to the code structure and syntax. However, Option C refers to a variable having the wrong numeric value passed into it, which is more of a logical error that typically requires dynamic testing to identify. Static analysis tools cannot understand the correct logical flow or expected values in the code, thus making Option C the correct answer?? .

The level of risk is determined by evaluating both the impact and the likelihood of an adverse event occurring. This approach ensures that both the severity of potential consequences and the probability of the event are considered. The impact assesses how serious the consequences would be if the event happened, while the likelihood evaluates how probable it is that the event will occur. This combination provides a comprehensive measure of risk, helping organizations prioritize their risk management efforts effectively??.

Debugging is the process that involves locating the cause of a failure and fixing the defect. Therefore, activities b) "Locating the cause of failure" and c) "Fixing the defect" are debugging activities. Identifying a failure and checking that the fix has resolved the failure are parts of testing, not debugging??.

Load testing is a type of non-functional testing used to verify that the system can handle a specified load of users performing transactions within acceptable performance parameters. In this case, load testing would ensure that up to 100 users can carry out transactions simultaneously with response times within 5 seconds. This testing helps identify performance bottlenecks and ensure that the system meets the performance requirements under expected user load conditions??.

In the provided state table, an invalid transition is represented by an empty cell. According to the table, Event E from State S4 is an invalid transition as the cell for this combination is empty. This indicates that the transition from State S4 on Event E is not defined??.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

According to the decision table:

For TC1, since Paul is not a full member but is a Loyalty Card holder and requests 18 holes with a buggy/cart, the applicable action is £18 Green Fees plus £5 for buggy/cart, totaling £23.

For TC2, since Cheryl is not a full member, does not have a Loyalty Card, and requests 9 holes with a buggy/cart, the applicable action is £16 Green Fees with no buggy allowed??.

According to the decision table, Test Case 1 is valid because an employee who is not a car or motorcycle driver cannot claim expenses, as shown in Rule 1. Test Case 3 is valid because a motorcycle driver can claim expenses, as indicated in Rule 2, with expenses claim band A. However, Test Case 2 is invalid because, according to Rule 5, a car driver with a diesel engine greater than 1600cc cannot claim expenses. The expected result should be that the expense claim is not allowed, not band C??.

To meet the test plan requirements and logical dependencies, the test schedule should start with re-tests (those that have previously failed), followed by the highest priority tests. Additionally, tests should be scheduled to create necessary test data for subsequent tests. In this case, teste(log in as admin user and create a standard user) must be done first as it is necessary to perform all other actions. Following this, testa(log in as standard user and create customer account) creates the standard user needed for subsequent actions. Then, the highest priority testd(order twoitems or more), which has failed before, should be executed next, followed by testc(create invoice for order), and finally testb(order one item)??.

Structural testing, also known as white-box testing, focuses on the internal structure of the software. It includes testing all paths, achieving decision coverage, and ensuring that all branches within the component calls are tested. Ensuring that users can navigate to all fields on the screen, however, is a form of functional testing, which focuses on the behavior and usability of the application from the user's perspective, rather than its internal structure??.

A dynamic analysis tool would have been the most effective at detecting a defect where a code component fails to release memory after use. These tools analyze the behavior of the software while it is running, allowing them to identify issues like memory leaks, which occur when memory is not properly freed. Dynamic analysis tools can monitor the allocation and deallocation of memory in real-time, helping to pinpoint the exact location and cause of the memory leak before the software is deployed?? .

When a developer makes a mistake that introduces a fault in the code, and this fault is not detected during testing, it becomes a latent defect. The definite consequence is that if this defect is executed under specific conditions, it may cause the system to fail. The actual failure occurs only when the defect is triggered during the system's operation. This emphasizes the importance of thorough testing to catch such defects before the software is released??.

Decision coverage is a testing metric used to ensure that all possible paths (decisions) in the code have been executed at least once. It is not used to verify the correctness of module calls, which ismore related to integration testing or control flow testing. Options A, B, and D describe valid uses of decision coverage, ensuring that decisions are exercised in programs, business processes, and measuring the extent of coverage by a test suite?? .

Statement testing is a white-box test technique that involves creating test cases to execute specific statements in the code. The goal is to ensure that all statements in the program are executed at least once during testing. This technique requires knowledge of the internal structure of the code and focuses on verifying the flow of execution and logic within the program??.

The correct logical order for the test cases ensures a smooth and realistic flow through the system functionalities. The sequence should start with logging into the system (Test Case 3), searching for available flights (Test Case 1), selecting an available flight (Test Case 4), viewing the selected item in My Flights (Test Case 2), confirming details and booking the flight in My Flights (Test Case 6), and finally printing the confirmation receipt and exiting (Test Case 5)?? .

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

The responsibility of conducting a test readiness review typically falls to the Test Manager. The Test Manager ensures that all necessary preparations for testing have been completed and that the testing environment, resources, and schedule are ready for the test execution phase. This role involves coordinating with different stakeholders to confirm that the testing process can proceed smoothly??.

The typical sequence of formal review activities includes planning, kick-off, individual preparation, and review meeting. The planning phase sets the scope and objectives, the kick-off initiates the review process, individual preparation involves participants reviewing the materials on their own, and then the review meeting is held to discuss the findings. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 3.2.2??.

The most valid goal for a test team is to cause as many failures as possible so that faults can be identified and corrected. This goal aligns with the primary objective of testing, which is to discover defects and ensure they are addressed before the software is released to end-users. By focusing on causing failures, the test team can identify weaknesses in the software and provide valuable feedback for improvements.

According to the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, version 4.0, the ultimate aim of testing is to find and fix defects to enhance the quality and reliability of the software. Proving that all faults are identified or that no faults will cause failures are unrealistic and less effective goals because it is impossible to guarantee that all defects have been found. Therefore, the goal of causing failures to find and fix faults is the most valid and practical approach for a test team??.

A defect, also known as a bug, is a flaw in a component or system that can cause it to fail to perform its required function. Defects arise from errors made by people, such as mistakes in code or design. When a defect in the software is executed, it can cause the system to behave unexpectedly, leading to failures. The relationship between errors, defects, and failures is crucial to understanding the importance of early detection and correction in the software development lifecycle.

Good communication is aided by trying to understand how the other person feels (i), confirming mutual understanding (iii), and emphasizing common goals such as better quality (iv). These actions foster a collaborative environment and ensure that all parties are on the same page. On the other hand, communicating personal feelings concentrating upon individuals (ii) and viewing each discussion as abattle to be won (v) hinder communication because they create a confrontational and subjective atmosphere. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 5.1.2 .

Configuration management involves practices like status accounting of configuration items, identification of test versions, record of changes to documentation over time, and controlled library access. However, auditing conformance to ISO9001 is related to quality management and not specifically part of configuration management??.

Testing and debugging are two distinct activities in the software development process. Testing, particularly dynamic testing, involves executing the software to identify failures caused by defects. It aims to find and document defects. Debugging, on the other hand, is the process of diagnosing and fixing the root causes of the failures identified during testing. According to the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, testing demonstrates the presence of defects, while debugging addresses and removes these defects??.

The purpose of exit criteria is to determine when to stop testing. Exit criteria are specific conditions or set of conditions agreed upon to declare that a particular test level or a test activity is completed. These criteria are used to ensure that the testing process has reached a certain level of coverage and quality before it is considered complete. Typical exit criteria include achieving a certain level of code coverage, passing a specified number of tests, or fixing a certain number of defects. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 5.1.3 .

Re-testing and regression testing are essential concepts in software testing, each serving a different purpose. According to the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, version 4.0, the difference between these two types of testing is highlighted as follows:

Re-testing(also known as confirmation testing) involves executing the same tests again on the same version of the software after defects have been fixed. The primary goal is to confirm that the original defects have been successfully removed and that the software behaves as expected.

Regression testing, on the other hand, is performed to ensure that recent code changes have not adversely affected the existing functionalities of the software. This testing aims to detect any unexpected side effects introduced by the new changes.

The syllabus states: "Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects"??. This explanation clarifies that while re-testing focuses on verifying specific defect fixes, regression testing ensures the overall stability and integrity of the software after changes.

Identifying faults during the design phase is most cost-effective because defects found early in the software development lifecycle are cheaper to fix. During the design phase, faults can be detected through reviews and inspections before any code is written, thus avoiding the costs associated with later stages of development. According to the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, early testing and defect detection are key principles, which emphasize that the cost of fixing defects increases the later they are found in the lifecycle??.

The implementation and execution phase of the fundamental test process involves the execution of the tests according to the test plan, where the main task is to compare the actual results of the test execution against the expected results. This phase ensures that the tests are carried out and the discrepancies between the actual and expected outcomes are identified and documented. This information is critical to determining whether the software behaves as intended and meets the specified requirements.

Assessing organizational maturity (i) is very important when deciding whether to introduce a test tool, as implementing a tool in an immature test organization with poor processes is unlikely to produce any benefits.

A quick return on the initial investment (ii) in a test tool is rare.

Having a requirement that a tool should be easy to use for untrained and unskilled testers (iii) is generally a false hope. This is comparable with expecting someone who has never driven a car to be able to drive safely and effectively.

Agreeing requirements before evaluating tools (iv) is essential. Not to do so would be comparable with building and testing a system without requirements.

In conclusion, (i) and (iv) are good principles to follow when introducing a tool and (ii) and (iii) are not.

The odd one out among the given options is "Functional". The other options—White box, Glass box, and Structural—refer to testing techniques that involve examining the internal structure of the application. In contrast, functional testing focuses on testing the software against its functional requirements without considering its internal structures??.

A test case defines the expected result of a test. The ISTQB CTFL syllabus v4.0 explains that a test case includes a set of input values, execution preconditions, expected results, and execution postconditions developed for a particular objective or test condition??.

The requirement phase serves multiple purposes. It aims to understand user needs, freeze the requirements to provide a stable basis for development, and define the scope of testing. These activities ensure that the project has a clear direction, and the testing efforts are aligned with the defined requirements. The ISTQB CTFL Syllabus outlines that a thorough requirement phase is essential for the success of subsequent phases in the software development lifecycle??.

All the options listed (Planning and control, Test closure activities, Analysis and design) are indeed part of the fundamental test process. The fundamental test process includes activities such as planning and control, analysis and design, implementation and execution, evaluating exit criteria and reporting, and test closure activities. Thus, the correct answer is 'None,' as all options are fundamental parts of the test process.

To cover all possible sequences of statements (paths) in the given program fragment, considering two independent conditions, we have the following scenarios:

Condition 1 true, Condition 2 true

Condition 1 true, Condition 2 false

Condition 1 false, Condition 2 true

Condition 1 false, Condition 2 false

These scenarios require 4 test cases to ensure all paths are tested. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 4.3.3??.

Checking test logs against the exit criteria specified in test planning is part of the exit criteria evaluation phase, not the test implementation and execution phase. Test implementation and execution tasks include developing and prioritizing test cases, creating test data, writing test procedures, preparing test harnesses, writing automated test scripts, logging the outcome of test execution, and verifying the test environment setup. The ISTQB CTFL Syllabus delineates these tasks to ensure proper test preparation and execution??.

Test implementation and execution involve several major tasks, which include:

i. Developing and prioritizing test cases, creating test data, writing test procedures, and optionally preparing the test harnesses and writing automated test scripts. This is crucial for ensuring that all aspects of the software are thoroughly tested and that the tests are prepared systematically.

ii. Creating the test suite from the test cases for efficient test execution. This helps organize the test cases in a way that optimizes the testing process and ensures coverage.

iii. Verifying that the test environment has been set up correctly. Ensuring that the test environment is correctly configured is critical for valid test results.

iv. Determining the exit criteria is part of the test planning phase, not the implementation and execution phase.

According to the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, version 4.0, these activities are critical for the successful implementation and execution of tests. Therefore, the statement "i, ii, iii are true and iv is false" accurately reflects the tasks involved in this phase??.

Functional and structural tests are types of testing techniques that can be applied at various levels of testing. According to the ISTQB CTFL syllabus, functional and structural tests are not restricted to any specific test level but are applicable across all levels of testing. This includes component, integration, system, and acceptance testing. The use of both types of tests helps ensure comprehensive testing coverage, addressing both the functional requirements and the internal structure of the software product??.

Valid test objectives include finding defects (i), gaining confidence about the level of quality and providing information (ii), and preventing defects (iii). Debugging the code (iv) is not a valid test objective as it is a part of the development process rather than the testing process.

Use-case testing involves scenarios based on the use cases of a system. In a use-case diagram, an actor represents a type of user (i). A use-case describes interactions between actors and the system (iii). Test cases can be based on use-case scenarios (v), and use-case testing often identifies gaps not found by testing individual components (vi). However, an actor is not always a human user (iv), and use-cases are not the most common test basis for unit testing (ii).

Typically, exit criteria may consist of various metrics that indicate whether testing has been sufficiently thorough. Estimates of defect density or reliability measures are common exit criteria used to decide if the software is ready for the next stage or release. These criteria help in assessing the quality and stability of the software based on the number and severity of defects found during testing??.

The Black-box testing technique is a method where the internal structure or workings of the item being tested are not known to the tester. This technique focuses on the input and output of the software system, ensuring that it meets the specified requirements without considering the internal code structure. It contrasts with White-box testing, which involves testing internal structures or workings of an application.

A technical review is a formal type of review that focuses on discussing, making decisions, evaluating alternatives, finding defects, solving technical problems, and checking conformance to specifications, plans, regulations, and standards. It is typically conducted by a team of experts and aims to ensure the technical quality of the product.

Debugging is the process where developers identify, locate, and correct defects. Testers are then responsible for confirming that the correction has resolved the original defect. This separation of responsibilities ensures that defects are properly fixed and verified.

Equivalence partitioning divides input data into partitions where each partition is expected to be treated the same way by the system. The values $2,000 (no duty), $2,001 (taxed at 10%), and $10,000 (partially taxed at 12%) fall into three different equivalence classes based on the provided tax brackets, ensuring different behaviors for each class.

To achieve 100% statement coverage and 100% decision coverage for the provided pseudo code, at least two test cases are required. The first test case should cover the scenario where X > Y, which will execute the statements in the "if" branch. The second test case should cover the scenario where X ? Y, which will execute the statements in the "else" branch. This ensures that both the true and false branches of the decision are tested, and all statements in the code are executed at least once.

In formal reviews, such as inspections, the role of the moderator is crucial. The moderator is responsible for leading the review process, ensuring that the review is conducted according to the defined procedures, and facilitating the review meeting. The ISTQB syllabus highlights that the moderator's role is to guide the review team, manage any issues that arise during the review, and ensure that the objectives of the review are met??.

An incident report should include additional details such as the status of the incident (e.g., new, open, closed), the degree of impact (e.g., critical, major, minor), and the Test Case Number to provide a complete understanding of the context and severity of the issue.

Integration testing focuses on the interactions between integrated components or systems. It aims to identify defects in the interfaces and interaction points between different parts of the system. According to the ISTQB syllabus, the test basis for integration testing typically includes software and system design documents, while the test objects are the interfaces and interactions between components. The goal is to ensure that the integrated parts function together as intended??.

When evaluating risks, both the likelihood of failure and the potential cost of impact must be considered. The risk with the highest level is determined by the product of these two factors. In this case, a 10% likelihood of failure with a potential cost of impact of $500,000 results in a higher risk (expected impact) compared to the other options. The expected impact is calculated as likelihood multiplied by impact, which is higher for option B??.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Statement testing is a structure-based (white box) testing technique. It involves executing all the executable statements in the code at least once. This technique requires knowledge of the internal structure of the code, making it a white box testing method.

Test execution tools include tools that directly assist in the execution of tests and comparison of actual outcomes with predicted outcomes. A test harness (b) is used to execute tests by providing the necessary context and data inputs for running a test. Test comparators (d) are used to compare the actual results produced by the system under test with the expected results, which is a key part of test execution.

The value of static code analysis lies in its ability to detect defects early in the development process. By analyzing the code without executing it, static analysis can identify potential issues, such as coding errors or violations of coding standards, which can be addressed before they lead to more significant problems.

The four test levels defined for a common V-model testing approach are Component, Integration, System, and Acceptance testing. These levels align with the development stages in the V-model,where each level of testing corresponds to a specific phase in the software development lifecycle, ensuring comprehensive verification and validation of the software??.

When considering the use of testing tools, it is essential to first perform an analysis of the current test process. This analysis helps identify areas where tool support can provide the most benefit. Introducing tools without this assessment might lead to inefficiencies or the selection of inappropriate tools. A thorough evaluation ensures that the tools will effectively support and enhance the existing test process.

Equivalence Partitioning is a black-box testing technique that divides the input data of a software unit into partitions of equivalent data from which test cases can be derived. It helps in reducing the number of test cases while maintaining adequate test coverage.

The main reason for using a pilot project to introduce a testing tool into an organization is to assess whether the tool will be cost-effective. A pilot project allows the organization to evaluate the tool's benefits, identify any potential issues, and determine whether the investment in the tool is justified based on its performance and the value it adds.

The appropriate test execution schedule considering the prioritization and constraints should start with re-tests, followed by the regression test script. After these, tests should be run based on their priority levels:

a (Re-test defect no 52, Low priority, Re-test)

c (Re-test defect no 26, High priority, Re-test)

d (Run regression test script, Medium priority, Regression)

b (Ability to amend transaction type, High priority)

g (Reprint selected previous sales figures, High priority, Must be run after item e)

e (Print monthly sales figures, Medium priority)

i (Print year-to-date figures, Medium priority)

f (Add special invoice to previous month, Low priority)

h (Account administrator able to amend any previous month’s sales figures, Low priority)

This sequence ensures that re-tests and high-priority tasks are completed first, followed by medium-priority tasks, and then low-priority tasks.

To verify the non-functional requirements such as the support for a minimum number of enquiries per hour, availability, and response time during peak loads, the most appropriate set of test types would include Performance Testing to assess the responsiveness and stability, Load Testing to verify the system's ability to handle expected user loads, and Stress Testing to determine the system's behavior under extreme conditions. These tests collectively ensure that the system meets the specified non-functional criteria.

Exit criteria are the conditions that must be met to conclude a particular phase of testing. These criteria include acceptance criteria, completion criteria, and pass/fail criteria. They help ensure that the testing process is thorough and that the system meets the required standards before moving on to the next phase.

Maintenance testing is conducted on the software after it has been delivered to address any issues or changes required due to defects, environment changes, or new requirements. The ISTQB syllabus explains that maintenance testing typically involves impact analysis to determine the extent of regression testing required, thus optimizing the testing effort and focusing on affected areas??.

Independence in software testing refers to the separation of testing activities from the development and production processes. This separation helps ensure objectivity and reduces the risk of bias in the testing results. Independent testers are more likely to identify defects that developers might overlook due to familiarity with the code. The ISTQB syllabus highlights the importance of independence in testing as a key factor in promoting effective and unbiased testing practices??.

An effective incident report should provide a clear and detailed description of the issue, including the title, reproducibility, a detailed description of the failure, and any relevant references to specifications. This helps in accurately identifying, reproducing, and resolving the defect. In this case, including the specific reference to the PID and a screenshot helps provide all necessary information for resolving the issue.