ITIL-4-Specialist-Create-Deliver-and-Support Practice Exam Questions with Answers ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and SupportExam Certification

The best way is to ensure that solutions provided by suppliers are captured and shared within the support team (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guide (Section 4.3.4) recommends knowledge management as a key practice to reduce reliance on external suppliers by documenting and disseminating resolutions, thereby decreasing response times and costs for recurring incidents. This approach builds internal capability, minimizing delays from supplier coordination. Option A delays resolution; option C depends on supplier action beyond the manager’s control; and option D, while beneficial, is a validation step that doesn’t address knowledge retention. The guide underscores the importance of a knowledge base in incident management.

The approach to reduce rework is to train agents to capture the information required by each support team (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support documentation (Section 4.1.3) states: "Training service desk agents to collect comprehensive and accurate ticket data reduces escalation rework by ensuring higher tiers receive sufficient context, minimizing delays and recurring incidents." This empowers first-line support, unlike option A (validation is reactive), option C (restricts ticket use), or option D (swarming is broader but less targeted). The guide notes: "Effective training enhances ticket quality and resolution efficiency."

Following a predefined procedurefor investigating web performance incidents ensures astructured and efficient escalation, reducing delays and avoiding confusion about responsibility.

Topic-based forumsenable structuredtwo-way communicationbetween users and the product team, allowing users to ask questions and provide feedback directly.

Service level managementfocuses on understanding and capturing customer expectations and experiences, making it the practice most likely toidentify dissatisfactionandinitiate improvement actions.

The company should integrate feedback loops and escalation mechanisms in the workflow (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support study guide (Section 2.2.2) explains that effective value stream design requires iterative feedback to ensure quality while maintaining speed, and escalation mechanisms to address issues promptly. This approach allows for continuous improvement and adjustment during service creation, balancing the trade-off between rapid delivery and high standards. Option A creates silos, reducing coordination; option C compromises consistency; and option D, while useful, is a testing method rather than a structural solution. The guide stresses that feedback loops, such as user testing or peer reviews, are essential for optimizing value streams.

The best approach is to review the incident resolution value stream (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guide (Section 4.3.3) states: "Analyzing the incident resolution value stream identifies bottlenecks, such as delays in change implementation, and enables end-to-end optimization to meet agreed times." This holistic review addresses the specific issue of change-related delays, unlike option A (adjusting targets avoids fixing the problem), option C (narrowly focuses on authorization), or option D (misses the value stream context). The guide adds: "Value stream analysis is key to aligning incident and change processes."

The goal of the ‘shift-left’ approach is repositioning tasks to earlier stages in the process to boost workflow efficiency (A). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guide (Section 3.3.1) explicitly defines shift-left as a strategy to move activities, such as support or testing, closer to the point of origin—often to users or frontline teams—to reduce delays, improve response times, and enhance overall service delivery. This approach leverages automation and self-service tools to empower users, thereby streamlining workflows and reducing the burden on higher-tier support teams. Option B focuses on automation alone, which is a supporting mechanism but not the core goal; option C relates to Agile methodologies, which are distinct from shift-left; and option D pertains to supplier integration, which is unrelated to this concept. The emphasis on efficiency is further supported by examples like self-service password resets, where tasks are shifted to users, aligning with ITIL’s focus on value co-creation.

The best strategic approach is to invest in targeted training programmes for existing staff in relevant emerging technologies (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support documentation (Section 3.3.2) states: "Investing in training leverages existing staff knowledge, aligns competencies with new market needs, and ensures cultural continuity, which is critical during expansion." This is cost-effective and builds internal capability, unlike option A (expensive hiring), option C (relinquishes control), or option D (disruptive restructuring). The guide notes: "Skill development supports the service value system’s adaptability."

Continuous integration (CI) is a practice that involves frequently integrating code changes into a shared repository, allowing teams to detect and resolve issues early. In the context of the scenario, where delays occur due to developers using individual repositories, CI would help by enabling regular integration of code, reducing conflicts, and streamlining the development process. This aligns with the ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guidance on optimizing value streams through effective planning and building practices. The official ITIL 4 CDS study guide (Section 2.2.1) emphasizes that CI reduces delays by automating integration and testing, which is critical when managing service creation and changes. Other options like continuous delivery (B) and continuous deployment (C) are subsequent steps that build on CI, while continual improvement (D) is a broader practice not specifically addressing the repository issue.

The best approach is that deployment management plays an important role in any value stream requiring transition of service components to the production environment (C). According to the ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guide (Section 3.2.2), deployment management ensures smooth transitions across value streams, including creation, delivery, and support, not just new service creation. Options A and B are too restrictive, and option D is incorrect as deployment can support incident resolution indirectly.

The organization should first use value stream mapping to help understand the end-to-end flow of user support (A). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support study guide (Section 2.3.1) states: "Value stream mapping is the initial step to visualize and analyze the flow of activities, identifying inefficiencies and delays in service delivery processes." This provides a foundation for addressing user complaints by pinpointing bottlenecks before implementing solutions like collaboration (B), tool integration (C), or skill reviews (D). The guide emphasizes: "Mapping ensures a holistic view, essential for effective planning and improvement."

CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery)is often included in anAgile approachto accelerate and automate software development, testing, and deployment.

Nearshoringinvolves sourcing services from a supplier in anearby countrywithsimilar working hours, facilitating easier communication and collaboration.

The service provider should review the incident resolution value stream (D). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guide (Section 4.3.3) recommends analyzing the end-to-end value stream to identify delays across multiple teams and processes, including changes and supplier involvement. Options A, B, and C address specific elements but lack the holistic view needed.

‘Service integration and management’ works by coordinating and managing multiple suppliers within a single value stream, ensuring that all suppliers contribute effectively to the delivery of consistent services aligned with the organization's value creation efforts.