Get Integration-Architect Dumps : Verified Salesforce Certified Integration Architect (SP25)

The integration architect should consider whether the fulfillment system can make a callback into Salesforce and whether it can implement a contract-first Outbound Messaging interface. A callback is a way for the fulfillment system to send a response or an acknowledgment back to Salesforce after receiving an order1. This can help ensure data consistency and reliability between the two systems. A contract-first Outbound Messaging interface is an approach where the integration is designed based on a predefined XML schema that defines the structure and content of the messages2. This can help ensure interoperability and compatibility between the two systems. The other two questions are not relevant for the integration architect to consider. The fulfillment system does not need to create new addresses within the Order Create service, as this is a function of Salesforce3. The product catalog data does not need to be identical at all times in both systems, as long as there is a mapping or synchronization mechanism to handle any discrepancies

Using an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) to determine which shipping service to use, and transform requests to the necessary format is a good solution because it can provide routing, transformation, mediation, and orchestration capabilities for integrating different services. An ESB can also abstract the complexity and heterogeneity of the services from the client application, which simplifies the integration. Using Outbound Messaging to request costs and delivery times from Shipper delivery services with automated error retry is not a good solution because Outbound Messaging is a Salesforce-specific feature that uses SOAP web services, which may not be compatible with all shipping services. Using APEX REST Service to implement routing logic to the various shipping service is also not a good solution because it can introduce performance and scalability issues, as well as increase the maintenance cost and complexity of the code. Using Enterprise Service Bus user interface to collect shipper-specific form data is not a valid option because an ESB does not have a user interface component. Reference: Salesforce Integration Architecture Designer Resource Guide, page 16-17

• Answer D is valid because using middleware to handle the call out to the 10 different verification services is a scalable and reliable solution that can handle the complexity and variability of the integration. The middleware can orchestrate the calls to the different web services, consolidate the verification results, and handle any errors or retries. The middleware can then make a call-in to Salesforce and update the verification status to “verified” using an API or a platform event12
• Answer A is not valid because using Salesforce external service to make the call out to the 10 different verification services is not a feasible or efficient solution. Salesforce external service is a feature that allows invoking an external service from a flow and mapping its inputs and outputs to flow variables. However, this feature requires configuring an Apex action, a named credential, and an external service definition for each web service, which is not a low code solution. Moreover, this feature does not support checking the verification agencies until the result is verified, as it only invokes the external service once per flow interview3
• Answer B is not valid because creating a trigger on the trainer record to make a callout to each verification agency is not a recommended or robust solution. Triggers are Apex code that execute before or after database events, such as insert, update, or delete. However, triggers cannot make callouts directly, as they are part of a database transaction and must complete quickly. To make a callout from a trigger, an asynchronous process such as a future method or a queueable job must be used, which adds complexity and overhead to the integration. Moreover, triggers have limits on the number of callouts and asynchronous calls they can make per transaction, which may affect the scalability and reliability of the integration.
• Answer C is not valid because making an Apex callout using @future annotation to make the call out to all different agencies is not a suitable or reliable solution. The @future annotation allows marking a method for execution at a later time when system resources become available. However, this annotation has several limitations and drawbacks, such as:

1: Orchestration Pattern 2: Remote Process Invocation—Request and Reply 3: External Services : Apex Developer Guide: Triggers : Apex Developer Guide: Using Future Methods

The integration architect should consider the impact of deleted records on system functionality, the ability to delete personal data in every system, and the ability to provide a 360-degree view of the customer. These are important requirements for ensuring that the company can comply with the privacy and data protection regulations, as well as deliver a customer-centric service. Option A is not correct because manual steps and procedures are not desirable for deleting personal data on demand. The integration architect should aim for an automated and reliable solution that minimizes human intervention and errors. Option D is not correct because restoring deleted records when needed may violate the privacy and data protection regulations, as well as the customer’s consent. The integration architect should ensure that the deletion of personal data is permanent and irreversible.

Using Salesforce custom object, custom REST API and ETL is a better solution than using Salesforce standard object, REST API and ETL. A custom object can store the order information and provide more flexibility and control over the data model, validation rules, triggers, etc. A custom REST API can be used to create orders in real time from Salesforce, using the ESB as a proxy to communicate with the legacy system. An ETL tool can be used to sync the order history and status from the legacy system to Salesforce, using the last modified date as a filter. This way, sales reps can see the order history and the most up-to-date information on current order status, and managers can run reports on order volumes and fulfillment timelines. A standard object, such as Order, may not meet all the business requirements and may require more customization than a custom object. A standard REST API may not provide enough security and error handling for creating orders in real time. Reference: Salesforce Integration Architecture Designer Resource Guide, page 18