OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Practice Exam Questions with Answers OMG Certified UML Professional 2 (OCUP 2) - Foundation Level Certification

In UML, a static property is one that belongs to the class itself rather than any instance of the class. In UML diagrams, static properties are denoted by underlining the property name.

Now, let's review the options:

A. There is no UML notation in the diagram that specifies whether the property db is a primary key. Primary keys are a database concept and UML does not have a standard way to denote them.

B. The property db is underlined, which indicates that it is a static property. This is the correct UML notation for depicting a class-level attribute.

C. There is no indication in the diagram that db is inherited from a superclass. Inherited properties typically are not underlined (unless they are also static), and there is no superclass shown in the diagram.

D. Underlining in UML does not signify importance or emphasis by the modeler, it indicates that a property is static.

Therefore, the answer isB: The property db is a static property. This is based on standard UML notation as outlined in the UML 2.5 Specification by the Object Management Group (OMG), which dictates that static members (attributes or operations) are underlined in class diagrams.

In a UML sequence diagram, a lifeline is represented by a box at the top of a dashed line. The box contains the name of the lifeline and can optionally include the object name, a colon, and the class name or the type (if the lifeline represents a specific instance of a class or type).

In the provided sequence diagram, the lifeline has the following notation:

sensorDriver[x-axisGyro]: DeviceDriver

This notation includes three parts:

• sensorDriveris the name of the lifeline, which represents the identity of the participating element.
• [x-axisGyro]is a selector that specifies that the lifeline represents a specific object within a set of similar objects.
• DeviceDriveris the type of the object that the lifeline represents.

Based on this, the name of the property that the lifeline represents in the "Start Sensor Device Driver" interaction issensorDriver.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

C. sensorDriver

In UML class diagrams, relationships between classes are represented in a number of different ways, including generalization, association, and composition.

Looking at the provided options, let's analyze each one:

A. responsiblePerson inherits from Person – This is incorrect because theresponsiblePersonis an attribute of theTaskclass, not a class itself, so it cannot inherit fromPerson.

B. Client and Manager have nothing in common – This is incorrect because bothClientandManagerare specialized types ofPersonas indicated by the generalization arrows pointing toPerson.

C. responsiblePerson can not refer to an object of class Client – This is incorrect.responsiblePersonis typed byPerson, which means that it can refer to an instance of any subclass ofPerson, includingClient.

D. The object referred to as responsiblePerson can be a Manager – This is correct. SinceresponsiblePersonis an attribute of theTaskclass with the typePerson, andManageris a subclass ofPerson,responsiblePersoncan indeed refer to an instance ofManager.

The correct answer is based on the UML 2 Foundation specification that describes how attributes are typed by classes and can refer to instances of these classes or their subclasses (UML 2.5 specification, sections 9.3.3 and 9.5.3). The generalization relationship (represented by a triangle followed by a line) establishes a hierarchy between a more general element and a more specific element, which in this case means thatClientandManagerare both specific types ofPersonand can be used whereverPersonis expected (UML 2.5 specification, section 9.4.5).

In UML, basic types like byte, short, and long are represented as DataType elements. These are typically used to specify the types of attributes, parameters, or return values of operations in a model. Option A shows three separate classes named Byte, Short, and Long, which would represent these as distinct data types within the UML model.

Option B incorrectly uses stereotypes on objects, which is not the correct UML representation for data types. Option C shows a class with attributes of different types, but it does not define these types as basic types. Option D is incorrect because it uses stereotypes on DataType elements, which is not the standard way to represent basic types in UML.

According to the UML 2.5 specification, DataTypes are a kind of classifier that specifies a domain of values without identity (section 10.5.8). DataTypes are not classes; they do not have operations and cannot have instances that maintain an identity.

The correct answer is Option B based on its visual representation and alignment with the given scenario:

• Class Start Condition: Both diagrams (Option B and Option C) include a decision diamond labeled "10 Students Present?". This captures the condition for the class to start.
• Professor Arrival: Option B explicitly shows the arrival of the professor using an action rectangle labeled "Professor Arrives". This directly addresses the second part of the scenario where the professor's presence is required.
• Start Activity: Both Option B and C have a subsequent activity labeled "Start Class".

Why Option B is More Accurate:

While both Option B and Option C depict the 10 student condition, Option B goes a step further by including the professor's arrival as a separate action, making it a more precise representation of the two-part requirement for the class to start.

Other Options Analysis:

• Option A: This diagram lacks the "10 Students Present?" condition and the professor's arrival, making it unsuitable for the given scenario.
• Option D: This diagram entirely misses the concept of students or the professor, focusing on a different situation.

References

• UML 2.5.1 Specification (Superstructure): Sections on Activity Diagrams, Decisions, and Actions https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/

Abstraction in UML and software modeling often incorporates the technique of information hiding. Information hiding is a principle that supports abstraction by ensuring that unnecessary details about software components are not exposed to other parts of the system. This encapsulation strengthens modularity and keeps various parts of the program independent of one another, which simplifies complexity in large systems. Abstraction and information hiding are closely related; abstraction focuses on the high-level structure of the system, while information hiding protects the internal states and functionality of components, allowing changes without extensive impact on other system parts.

The most appropriate use of UML during software development is to capture the essential characteristics and design decisions of a planned or existing system. UML (Unified Modeling Language) is primarily utilized to visually represent the architecture, design, and behavior of a system, which includes detailing the components, relationships, and interactions within the system. This makes it a critical tool for understanding complex systems and making informed design decisions that align with project requirements and constraints. UML facilitates clear communication among development team members and stakeholders, ensuring that design decisions are well-understood and accurately implemented.

In UML, when you need to reference an element from another package while inside a different package, you use the qualified name. A qualified name includes the package name followed by two colons and then the element name. This ensures that the reference is clear and unambiguous, especially when different packages may have elements with the same name.

The correct syntax for referring to elementOneof PackageP1from inside PackageP2isP1::One, where::is the scope resolution operator used to separate the package name from the element name.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

D. P1::One

In UML use case diagrams, when specifying the number of actors involved in a use case, a multiplicity marker can be used. The multiplicity marker is a number placed near the actor symbol that denotes how many instances of the actor are involved in the use case.

Option C correctly uses a multiplicity marker of '2' next to the actor 'Player', which indicates that exactly two instances of 'Player' are involved in the "Play Tennis" use case.

Here is a brief explanation of why the other options are incorrect:

A) Option A shows two separate 'Player' actors involved in "Play Tennis" without a multiplicity marker, implying possibly different kinds of players, but does not specify that exactly two instances are required. B) Option B shows two 'Player' actors involved in "Play Tennis" without a multiplicity marker, also not specifying the exact number of instances required. D) Option D uses a multiplicity marker, but it is incorrectly placed near the 'Play Tennis' use case instead of the 'Player' actor, which does not follow UML notation for indicating actor multiplicity.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

C. Option C

In UML, the features of a class are the combined set of attributes (properties) and operations (methods) that are defined for that class. A feature is a characteristic that classifiers (like classes) can possess. In the context of UML, operations are considered behavioral features, while attributes are considered structural features.

Let's analyze the given options in the context of the Car class:

A. "drive()" is an operation (method) of the Car class, but "Car" itself is the name of the class, not a feature.

B. "stop()" is an operation of the Car class, but "driver" is a role name for an association, not a feature of the Car class.

C. "name" is an attribute of the Person class, not the Car class. "stop()" is indeed an operation of the Car class.

D. "drive()" and "stop()" are operations of the Car class. "Person" is not a feature of the Car class, but no attributes of the Car class are shown in the diagram, and since features include both operations and attributes, the correct answer from the available options isD. It is understood that operations of a class are features, so the answer includes both operations of the Car class: "drive()" and "stop()".

According to the UML 2 Foundation specification, both structural features (attributes) and behavioral features (operations) are considered features of a class, so the correct answer would be the operations "drive()" and "stop()" since those are the only features explicitly represented in the Car class in the diagram.

Pseudostates in UML state machines serve a different purpose than regular states. They are used as markers or waypoints to facilitate complex state transitions. Key distinctions include:

• Transient Nature: Pseudostates do not represent persistent states of an object. They are not associated with entry/exit actions or internal activities like regular states. The state machine immediately transitions through a pseudostate.
• Run-to-Completion Restrictions: A run-to-completion step (the sequence of states and transitions activated by a single event) cannot end in a pseudostate.

Let's analyze why the other options are incorrect:

• Option A (A pseudostate must have an outgoing transition):While most pseudostates have outgoing transitions to guide the flow of the state machine, this is not a strict requirement. For example, the 'terminate' pseudostate signifies the end of a statemachine and thus has no outgoing transitions.
• Option B (An outgoing transition from a pseudostate must always terminate on a regular state):While true in many cases, outgoing transitions can also target other pseudostates for more intricate state machine designs.
• Option D (The outgoing transitions of a pseudostate must have triggers that consist exclusively of guard conditions):Pseudostate transitions can have a mix of triggers, including events, timeouts, and guard conditions.

References:

• UML Specification (Superstructure) Version 2.5.1: Specifically, sections covering statemachines (Chapter 14), pseudostates (Section 14.2.3.8), and run-to-completion steps (Section 14.2.3.13). You can find it on the OMG website: https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1

An event occurrence in a UML Sequence Diagram refers to specific points in time where messages are sent or received. Each message send and each message receipt is counted as one event occurrence.

In the provided diagram for InteractionP, we have the following event occurrences:

• The send event ofm1().
• The receive event ofm1()by:Two.
• The send event ofm2().
• The receive event ofm2()by:One.

Counting these, we see that there are a total of 4 event occurrences specified in InteractionP.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

C. 4

In UML sequence diagrams, an execution specification is represented by a thin rectangle along a lifeline. It shows where in time the execution takes place, starting with the initiation of an operation or process and ending when that process is complete.

In the interaction diagram provided, we can see an execution specification on the lifelinep1: Pthat starts after the message corresponding to point 3 is received and ends just before the message corresponding to point 5 is sent. This means the execution specification is bracketed by points 3 and 5.

Points 1 and 2 represent message sends, 1 and 4 could represent a message send and receive for the same message, which doesn't typically represent the full execution specification. Points 2 and 3 don't represent a logical start and end of an execution specification because they're on different lifelines.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

D. 3, 5

In UML, when specifying the value of an attribute in an instance specification (which is what each of these boxes represents), the notation used is generally:

attributeName: Type = Value

Looking at each option provided, we see that they are different representations of numerical values for an attribute namedsalaryof typeReal. Here's how to interpret each representation:

A)-salary: Real = “$10,000.00”- This uses a string representation of the number, which is generally not how numerical values are assigned in UML, especially with the explicit typeReal.

B)-salary: Real = $20,000.00- This is more typical for showing a real number in UML, though the dollar sign is not part of the actual numerical value and should not be included.

C)-salary: Real = 30000.00- This is a correct numeric representation of a real number without unnecessary symbols.

D)-salary: Real = 40,000.00- This is also a correct representation and indeed has the highest numeric value among the options provided.

E)-salary: Real = 500 E 02- This is scientific notation, which is also a valid representation of real numbers in UML. The value represented here is 500 * 10^2, which equals 50,000.00.

After examining each option, the correct answer is D. Option D, because the instancefour:Employeehas the highest value properly assigned to asalaryslot according to the standard UML notation. However, there's a point to be clarified: while UML does not specify formatting of numbers with commas for thousands or currency symbols, it does accept scientific notation. So, if we were strictly interpreting the values as real numbers, Option E would represent the highest numerical value. But considering proper UML formatting and assuming the intent is to use standard decimal notation without currency symbols or commas, Option D is the best answer.

In UML 2, the dashed arrow with an open arrowhead represents a dependency relationship. In the context of class diagrams, a dependency relationship indicates that changes to one class (the independent class) may cause changes in the other class (the dependent class). The direction of the arrow specifies which class is dependent on which. In the given diagram, the arrow points from class A to class B, which means that class A is dependent on class B. This could manifest as class A using some services or functions of class B, for example.

References:

• UML 2.5 Specification Document: The official document by the Object Management Group (OMG), which defines the syntax and semantics of UML.
• UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language, Third Edition by Martin Fowler: This book provides a clear guide to UML and includes examples of dependency relationships.

In UML 2, a class diagram is used to depict the structure of a system by showing the system's classes, their attributes, operations (or methods), and the relationships among the classes. The constraint{age >= 18}in thePersonclass diagram indicates a condition that must hold true for the instances of thePersonclass whenever they are used in the context of aBankAccount. This constraint is an invariant of thePersonclass that specifies the rule for the attributeage.

Now, let's consider the provided options and explain why option B is correct:

A. The preferred age to open a bank account is 18 years old or older – This statement is incorrect because the diagram does not indicate a preference; it indicates a constraint or a rule.

B. Only customers who are 18 years old or older can open a bank account – This is the correct statement. The{age >= 18}constraint next to theageattribute of thePersonclass signifies that any instance ofPersonassociated with aBankAccountmust be at least 18 years old. SincePersonis connected toBankAccountwith the role namecustomer, this implies that only persons who are at least 18 can be customers of a bank account.

C. The age condition should only hold when the setAge(Integer) function is called – This statement is incorrect because the constraint{age >= 18}is not a condition that applies only when thesetAgeoperation is invoked. Instead, it is a class invariant that must always hold true for any instance ofPerson.

D. An object of Customer with age set to 18 or greater will raise an exception – This is incorrect because the UML diagram specifies a constraint, not an exception condition. The constraint ensures validity, not the raising of an exception.

The answer is verified according to the UML 2 Foundation documents, such as the UML 2.5 specification, where class diagrams and constraints are defined. The specification states that constraints are semantic conditions or restrictions expressed in natural language text or in a machine-readable language that must hold true for the system being modeled (UML 2.5 specification, section 7.9).

The sequence diagram provided shows two messages being sent:m2()andm1(). The vertical placement of messages on a sequence diagram typically indicates the order of message passing; however, if there is no horizontal line connecting the lifelines or an explicit ordering constraint provided, it suggests that the messages are asynchronous and there is no specified order between them.

In this diagram, there is no horizontal line connecting the lifelines foro2ando3, nor is there any other notation that would imply a strict ordering. This means that the messagesm2()andm1()can occur in any order, and the interaction is still considered valid.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

C. An execution of InteractionF can be valid no matter the order in which o2 and o3 receive their respective messages.

In UML modeling, a constraint is defined as:

A. a condition that must be satisfied when it is evaluated

A constraint is a semantic condition or restriction expressed in natural language text or a machine-readable language for expressing constraints, such as OCL (Object ConstraintLanguage). Constraints specify invariants that must hold for the system being modeled at all times. This means that whenever the constraint is evaluated, the condition it expresses must be satisfied (UML 2.5 specification, section 7.9).

The other options do not accurately define what a constraint is in the context of UML:

B. A condition that should be met depending on system operation – This is not precise as constraints are not optional and do not depend on system operation; they are always applicable.

C. A condition that causes the state of the objects to change over time – This describes a side effect, which is not the purpose of a constraint. A constraint is a condition that must always be met, not something that induces change.

D. A condition that constrains what can or cannot be put in a class diagram – This is too broad and imprecise. Constraints apply to elements within the class diagram and are not about the content of the diagram itself.

ML 2 Foundation concepts for activity diagrams, there are eight object nodes in total. Here's a breakdown of the elements:

Object Nodes:

• Order: This rectangle near the start of the diagram represents an object node.
• Cust Name: This rectangle following the "Get Customer Details" action is another object node.
• Order Details: This rectangle after the "Get Order Details" action is an object node as well.
• New Order: The rectangle positioned after the decision diamond (approved) is an object node.
• Repeat (text near the decision diamond): This is not an object node. It likely indicates a loopback or repetition, but it doesn't represent an object itself.
• Cust Order: The rectangle after the "Place Order" action is an object node.
• Invoice: The rectangle following the "Create Invoice" action is an object node.
• OrderAck: The rectangle at the end signifies another object node.

Counting the Nodes:

There are eight rectangles that represent object nodes in the diagram (Order, Cust Name, Order Details, New Order, Cust Order, Invoice, OrderAck).

References

• UML 2.5.1 Specification (Superstructure): Sections on Activity Diagrams and Object Nodes https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/

UML 2 Foundation concepts for activity diagrams, there are three valid action notations shown. Here's a breakdown of the elements and why answer D is the most accurate:

• The diagram displays an activity diagram with a main flow and a fork followed by a join.
• Main Flow: This starts with an action labeled "Fill Order".
• Fork: The path splits into two branches after "Fill Order".
• Branch 1: This branch leads to an action labeled "Print Paycheck".
• Branch 2: This branch leads to an action labeled "Send Invoice".
• Join: The two branches converge into a join element.
• Following the Join: An action labeled "End" is present after the join.

Explanation for Valid Actions:

• Fill Order: This clearly represents an action within the activity diagram.
• Print Paycheck: This is another valid action on a separate branch.
• Send Invoice: Similarly, this is an action on the other branch.

Explanation for Why Other Options are Incorrect:

• A. 0: There are clearly multiple actions depicted in the diagram.
• B. 1: There are more than one valid action shown.
• C. 2: While there are actions before the fork, there's also a valid action ("End") after the join.
• E. 4: Counting the join element as an action results in an overcount. Joins represent control flow elements to synchronize multiple paths, not actions themselves.

References

• UML 2.5.1 Specification (Superstructure): Sections on Activity Diagrams and Actions https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/

In the context of a UML (Unified Modeling Language) model, the class named 'Employee' represents a template for all entities that are classified as employees within the business enterprise model. Therefore, the correct answer is:

B. The set of all employees of the company

The term 'Employee' in the class diagram is a UML Class, which is defined as a description of a set of objects that share the same attributes, operations, relationships, and semantics (UML 2.5 specification, section 9.2). A class in UML is a blueprint from which individual objects (instances of the class) are created. It is not a representation of any single employee, an anonymous employee, or a diagram of an employee, but rather the conceptual model that defines the properties and behaviors of all employee instances in the domain being modeled.

Abstractions in a model are helpful because they can express or suppress detail as needed. This capability is essential in managing complexity in a model by focusing on the high-level, essential aspects of the system while omitting or simplifying the less critical details. This selective detail management aids in understanding and analyzing the system’s core functionality without getting overwhelmed by its intricacies. Abstractions facilitate clearer communication, more focused analysis, and more efficient system design by highlighting the most relevant aspects of the system in various contexts.