8006 Practice Exam Questions with Answers Exam I: Finance Theory Financial Instruments Financial Markets - 2015 Edition Certification

A rise in interest rates will cause fixed rate bond prices to fall. It will not affect the floating rate notes as their rates are going to float with the changes in interest rates. Inflation linked bonds will only be affected by changes in real interest rates, and even in a situation where the rise in interest rates is happening due to an increase in the real rates, a long position would hurt. As interest rates rise, the coupon payable on the inverse floater would fall, hurting a long position.

Of the given alternatives, the only position that would benefit from a rise in interest rates is the short position in fixed rate bonds. Hence Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

Everything else remaining the same, an increase in the rate of dividends causes the value of call options to fall and the value of put options to rise. Therefore, Choice 'b' is the correct answer. (In the exam, the question could address either a call or a put option, so be aware of the answer in either case).

To understand this, consider how dividends are accounted for when valuing an option using the Black Scholes model. Future dividends are discounted to the present using the risk free rate and this discounted value is reduced from the spot price used in the BSM valuation. Effectively, this reduces the spot price used in the BSM formula. When the spot price reduces, and the exercise price remains the same, then the value of the call option goes down. In the same way, when spot price is reduced by the present value of dividends (and the exercise price stays the same), obviously the put option becomes more valuable. Therefore an increase in the rate of dividends increases the value of the put option.

There is another intuitive way to think about this: A call option is like a long position in the stock, but the holder of the call option is not entitled to receive dividends (unlike the holder of the stock). Since the holder of the call option has to forego the dividends, he is willing to pay less for the option; or in other words, the value of the call reduces.

In the same way, a put option is like having a short position in the stock. The holder of the short position has to borrow the stock in order to get into the short position in the first place. When dividends are paid, the holder of the short stock position has to make good any dividends that might be paid to the lender of the stock. The holder of a put option does not have to make any such payments. Therefore the put option is more valuable, and the existence of dividends (or an increase in dividends) increases the value of the put option.

(Try this out using the Black Scholes Excel model given under the tutorials by varying the spot price.)

We can calculate the duration of the bond as follows:

PV of 1st coupon payment: $5/(1 + 5%/2) = $4.878

PV of final payment: $105/(1 + 5%) = $100

Weighted average of the two = (0.5*$4.878 + 1*$100)/($4.878 + $100) = 0.9767, ie this is the Macaulay duration.

Thus the modified duration is 0.9767/(1 + 5%/2) = 0.9529

(Note that Modified Duration = Macaulay Duration/(1 + y/n), where n is the compounding frequency)

In addition to this calculation, in this particular question we can intuitively arrive at the correct answer by eliminating the incorrect choices. Since the bond matures in a year, its modified duration will be less than a year. Therefore Choice 'a' and Choice 'b' cannot be correct. Similarly, 0.700 appears too low as the coupons are not so heavily weighted towards earlier in the year. Therefore only Choice 'c' can be the correct answer.

The all in price would be equal to the clean price plus accrued interest. The accrued interest for the 60 days that have passed since the last coupon payment is $5 x 60/360 = $0.83. Therefore the dirty price, or the all in price, will be $98.83. (Note that the $5 is the annual 5% coupon on the $100 face.)

The modified duration of a perpetual bond is given by 1/i, where i is the yield. Since I is a positive number greater than zero, it means the modified duration of a perpetual bond is not infinity. Also note that this formula makes no reference to the coupon rate at all - in other words, the modified duration of a perpetual bond is independent of the coupon. The Macaulay duration of a perpetual bond is given by (1+i)/i, again a formula devoid of any references to the coupon. The price of a perpetual bond can be calculated as Coupon/i, which means that a 15% coupon perpetual bond will be priced at exactly 3x the price of a 5% coupon bond.

Based on the above, statement I is incorrect, but statement II is correct. Statement III is incorrect because Bond A will be priced at exactly 1/3rd the price of Bond B, and not less than that. Similarly, statement IV is incorrect as well.

Intuitively, a perpetual bond is nothing but a perpetual annuity, which will have a present value equal to 1/i * cash flow (which in this case is the coupon). The coupon rate only sets the cash flow dollar amount - there is really no difference between the two bonds described in the question except that buying one of Bond B is economically identical to buying three of Bond A.

The forward price for a commodity is nothing but the spot price plus carrying costs till the maturity date of the forward contract. Any increase in carrying costs therefore has the effect of increasing the forward price. Note that carrying costs include interest cost in respect of funding the position, costs of storage, less any convenience yield.

Increase in the carrying costs will not affect the spot prices.

The transformation line represents the various possible combinations of the 'risky bundle' and the risk free asset. Investors can choose different combinations of the risky and risk-free asset depending upon their risk appetite. The transformation line meets the y-axis (portfolio returns) at the point equal to the risk free rate. Choice 'a' is the correct answer and the rest are incorrect.

The highest possible transformation line, ie the transformation line with the maximum slope, is the transformation line joining the risk free rate on the y-axis and the portfolio with the maximum Sharpe ratio on the efficient frontier. This line is called the 'capital markets line'. Investors can pick any point on this line according to their risk appetite, and doing so would maximize the return they can obtain for their desired level of risk. The capital markets line is tangential to the efficient frontier. The Sharpe ratio stays constant throughout the CML.

Remember that the transformation line and the capital markets lines are different from each other - there is only one CML for an efficient frontier, whereas there can be multiple transformation lines.

The put-call parity can be expressed as:

Call – Put = Spot – PV of exercise price

Note that a negative sign above means a short position. The 'term PV of exercise price' is the same as a bank deposit placed today equivalent to the PV of the exercise price so that we will have the cash flow on the exercise date to exercise the option.

Therefore only Choice 'd' is the correct answer as rearranging the above gives us Buying a call + Bank Deposit = Buying the stock + Buying a put.

Choice 'd' is therefore the correct answer.

A residential mortgage carries a prepayment option for the borrower, where in the event of a decrease in interest rates they are likely to repay the mortgage and refinance at the new lower rate. If rates go up, the bank does not have a similar option. If the volatility of the underlying interest rates increases, mortgage holders are more likely to be faced with new rates that are sufficiently lower to persuade them to refinance. This reduces the ability of the bank to continue to earn the higher interest rate it was earning before.

Therefore an increase in volatility of the mortgage interest rates decreases the value of the mortgage portfolio.

The same rationale applies to callable bonds, where the borrower has the option to call the bond.

In a Dutch auction, the buyers put in their bids and the price at which the entire auction clears is the price at which each bidder receives the security. For example, if Bank A bids 5.5% for a bond, Bank B bids 5.6% and Bank C bids 5.7% and the total amounts bid by these three banks are enough to clear the auction, each of the banks will receive the bond at the price paid by the lowest successful bidder, ie Bank C. This is even though Banks A and B had bid higher (remember that bidding a higher yield means offering a lower price).

In a standard auction, every bidder pays the price they bid.

In a Dutch auction, there is an incentive to bid aggressively if a participant believes the final winning bid will be lower.

Only the butterfly spread has a payoff profile that benefits when prices do not move much. The collar benefits during declining markets, the straddle and the strangle benefit from sharp movements in the markets. Therefore Choice 'c' is the correct answer.

The zero coupon spot rate for 4 years can be calculated as = (1.02*1.03*1.04*1.05)^(1/4) - 1 = 3.49%, which is the correct answer. (3.50% is just the mathematical average of the rates for the four years and is not correct, even though close.)

Choice 'b' represents a correct description of a bullet bond. All other choices are incorrect.

The Sharpe ratio does not require investors to be risk neutral, only that for a given level of returns they prefer less risk to more risk. (Risk neutral means that investors are indifferent to the level of risk, and are only driven by a desire to maximizing expected value, regardless of risk levels.)

The ability to borrow and lend any amounts of money at the risk free rate is a fundamental assumption for the rule that optimal portfolios will maximize the Sharpe ratio.

This rule also assumes that risk preferences are completely described by return and standard deviation of returns.

Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer as statements I and II are correct.

The efficient markets hypothesis states that all known information is captured in the prices of a security. It does not explain the shape of the yield curve.

The expectations hypothesis, the LPT and the market segmentation theory are all attempts to explain the shape of the term structure of interest rates.

Therefore Choice 'c' is the correct answer as it does not explain the shape of the yield curve.

A hedge based on portfolio duration alone makes the assumption that the price/yield relationship is linear, and ignores the convexity or non-linearity of the price/yield relationship. As prices change beyond small changes, the non-linear effect kicks in, which can be offset by making a convexity adjustment to the hedge. Therefore statements I and II are correct.

Statement III is incorrect - negative convexity has an adverse effect on bond prices regardless of whether prices rise or fall.

Statement IV is correct, a bond hedge based on duration alone may be mismatched along the yield curve (eg, hedging a 10 year maturity bond with a 3 year futures contract, even though of identical total durations), which is based upon the implicit assumption that all rates will move together (ie parallel shifts).

A traditional collateralized debt obligation (CDO) involves the complete transfer of securities to an SPV, which then issues notes or securities to investors. Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer.

A synthetic CDO achieves the same result as a traditional CDO, but uses credit derivatives to synthetically create the same economic effect as a traditional CDO.

A credit default swap is a derivative instrument that pays in the event of the occurrence of agreed credit events. The arrangement described in the question is not a credit default swap purchase. n-th to default swap arrangements are similar to CDSs, but on a portfolio with the first 'n' losses being covered by the swap.

A CDS contract provides exposure to default risk and the credit spread for a particular credit. It does not provide an exposure to the risk of interest rates going up or down. It is an instrument that allows institutions to take a view on the price of credit risk alone. Therefore statement I is false and statement II is true.

A total return swap (TRS) exchanges the return from an asset for a fixed or floating exchange rate. It is in essence a financing arrangement where one party pays the other interest to earn a return on an asset that it does not wish to hold itself, perhaps for liquidity reasons. The financed asset is held by the party paying the asset's returns, effectively creating a 'collateral'. Therefore statement III is correct.

A credit linked note is a funded instrument where the sellers of the protection have put up the money upfront in the form of a subscription to a note in case the credit losses are realized. Therefore statement IV is not correct.

The efficient frontier is plotted on a graph with portfolio return (mean) as the y-axis and portfolio volatility, or standard deviation, on the x-axis. Asset beta and standard deviation of the market portfolio have nothing to do with the determination of the efficient portfolio.Therefore Choice 'd' is the correct answer, and the rest of the choices are incorrect.

To answer this question, we need to look at the put-call parity, which can be expressed as:

Value of call - Value of put = Spot price - Exercise price discounted to the present

or, Value of call - Value of put = Stock - Bond with a future value equal to exercise price

Therefore, a long call and a short put is equivalent to a long stock position and a short bond.

Choice 'a' is therefore the correct answer. (Alternatively, we could also have constructed a graph of the payoff profiles to arrive at the same answer).

Generally, it is not a good idea to exercise an option early as any more upside in the remaining period to expiry is being sacrificed. However, if an extraordinarily large dividend is coming due, and this dividend is larger than the interest foregone from holding the option, it may be a good idea to exercise the option early. In such cases, the exercise needs to happen before the ex-dividend date and not afterwards. Choice 'b' is therefore the correct answer.

Even if the option is deep in the money and delta is approaching 1, and exercise upon maturity is almost a certainty, it would still always be better to sell the option than exercise it . Therefore Choice 'a' is incorrect. Choice 'c' is correct in all cases except when a large dividend is coming in. Choice 'd' is not correct because an early exercise needs to happen prior to the ex-dividend date and not afterwards.

Statement I is true as standard deviation is the root of the squared deviations, and is always positive, and identical regardless of the positions being long or short.Statement II is false as the expected return of a long position is exactly the negative of the expected return of the short position.Statement III is correct as a correlation of +1 between two long positions implies a correlation of -1 between one long and one short position. This is the basis of hedging, for example, of spot positions with futures.Statement IV is inaccurate. The weight of an asset in a portfolio does not change the correlation of the asset with the portfolio, or with other assets.Therefore Choice 'c' is the correct answer.

It is important to note the distinction between the clearing house and the exchange itself. The clearing house does not get involved with physical delivery, nor does it provide any dispute settlement services. It only makes sure that cash is settled as and when due between the members. Therefore Choice 'c' is the correct answer

The dividend payment has a present value of $2.20*e^( -6%*6/12) = $2.14. Therefore the forward price for delivery 9 months hence should be ($102 - $2.14)*e^(7%*9/12) = $105.25

In an interest rate swap, only the net payment is made. In this case,

- the customer pays the bank 4%*(3/12)*$100m

- the bank owes the customer (2% + 100bp))*(3/12)*$100m

Therefore the customer pays (4% - (2% + 100bp))*(3/12)*$100m. 3/12 represents the 3 month time interval. This is equal to a net payment of $250k from the customer to the bank. Therefore Choice 'c' is the correct answer and the rest are incorrect.

Forward rates can be calculated from spot rates and interest rates using the formula Spot x (1+domestic interest rate)/(1+foreign interest rate), where the 'Spot' is expressed as a direct rate (ie as the number of domestic currency units one unit of the foreign currency can buy). In this case the forward rate will be 1.1239 * (1 + 0.75%*90/360) / (1 + 0.4%*90/360) = 1.1249.

It can be confusing to determine which interest rate should be considered 'domestic', and which 'foreign' for this formula. For that, look at the spot rate. Think of the spot rate as being x units of one currency equal to 1 unit of the other currency. In this case, think of the spot rate 1.1239 as "CAD 1.1239 = USD 1". The currency that has the "1" in it is the 'foreign' and the other one is 'domestic'.

It is also important to remember how exchange rates are generally quoted. Most exchange rates are quoted in terms of how many foreign currencies does USD 1 buy. Therefore, a rate of 99 for the JPY means that USD 1 is equal to JPY 99. These are called 'direct rates'. However, there are four major world currencies where the rate quote convention is the other way round - these are EUR, GBP, AUD and NZD. For these currencies, the FX quote implies how many US dollars can one unit of these currencies buy. So a quote of "1.1023" for the Euro means EUR 1 is equal to USD 1.1023 and not the other way round.

All the statements are correct, and represent the relationships between the values of the Greek variables for calls and puts for the same option. It is important to know why as the PRM exam often asks tough questions about the Greeks.

Statement I is correct because of the put-call parity. According to the put-call parity,

Value of call - Value of put = Spot price - Exercise price discounted to the present

Now the delta of the spot is 1, and that of the discounted price is zero. Therefore

Delta of Call - Delta of Put = 1 - 0, or by rearranging we get the equation in statement I.

Statements II and III are correct as the gamma and vega of both the spot price and the discounted price are zero. Therefore using the put-call parity, we can say

Gamma of Call - Gamma of Put = 0 - 0, and

Vega of Call - Vega of Put = 0 - 0

Rearranging, we get statements II and III.

Statement IV is correct because of the following relationship between theta of call and theta of put:

Theta of Put = Theta of Call + rKe^(-rt).

Since rKe^(-rt) can only be a positive number, theta of put can only exceed the theta of a call. However, since theta is generally negative, it often implies that the theta of a call is the larger absolute number.

Additional explanation for the last point: Assume rKe^(-rt) =+1 and theta of a put is -5 (completely hypothetical)

Now Theta of Put = Theta of Call + rKe^(-rt)

Ie -5 = -6 + 1

Now -5 is the larger number than -6. In other words, theta of put exceeds that of the call in a pure mathematical sense, which is what I mean when I say “theta of put can only exceed the theta of call”. But if you ignore the sign, then theta of call is larger at 6 when compared to 5. Therefore the theta of the put is greater than the theta of the call – which is what the answer says.

The underlying asset in a Treasury note futures contract is any long term Treasury note with a maturity of no less than 6.5 years and no more than 10 years. The underlying asset in a treasury bond futures contract is any long term US Treasury bond with a maturity of more than 15 years and not callable within 15 years.

Note the difference betwen what the underlying asset is for treasury bond futures and treasury note futures. In either case, adjustments will be made for the coupon and maturity of the actual bond delivered (the concept of the adjustment of 'cheapest-to-deliver').

This is a trick question, no great science to it. Remember that the 'present value of a basis point' refers to PV01, which is the same as BPV (basis point value) referred to in the PRMIA handbook. In other textbooks, the same term is also variously called 'DV01' (dollar value of a basis point). Remember these other terms too.

PV01, or the present value of a basis point, is the change in the value of a bond (or other fixed income security) from a 1 basis point change in the yield. PV01 is calculated as (Price * Modified Duration/10,000).

An m x n FRA is an agreement to borrow money for a period starting at time m and ending at time n at the contracted rate. Therefore, the buyer of the 3 x 6 FRA has committed to borrow $1m at the beginning of 3 months and return it at the end of 6 months, ie a total borrowing period of 3 months at a rate of 5%. Of course, the $1m is never actually exchanged, and at the beginning of the 3 month period when the next three months' interest rate is known (6%), the parties merely exchange the difference in the interest. SInce this interest was only due at the end of the 6 months and is being exchanged at the 3 month time point, it will have to be discounted to its present value.

The correct answer to this question is =(1,000,000 * (6% - 5%) * 3/12)/(1 + (6%*3/12))=$2463.05. Since interest rates rose, the borrower gained as he has the right to borrow at a lower rate, and therefore the seller will pay the borrower.

(Here:

- $1m is the notional

- 6% - 5% represents the difference between the contracted and the realized interest rates

- 3/12 is the 3 month period from month 3 to 6

- Finally, we divide by the current interest rate for 3 months to present value the payment from month 6 to month 3)

T-bill futures and fed futures are very short term futures contracts, and unlikely to provide much of a hedge against a rise in interest rates. FRAs however are customized and would be the right instrument for the borrower to hedge his interest rate risk. A long FRA position gives him the right to borrow at an agreed rate in the future. This rate will not change regardless of the changes in interest rates, and therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

Explanation:

In an American option, early exercise of the option is permitted. In a European option, early exercise is not permitted. Therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

Explanation:

If the spot rate is 1.1010 and the forward is 1.1040, the swap rate is 30 "points" (= 1.1040 - 1.1010). The annualized swap premium is the swap premium divided by the spot rate, and therefore =0.0030/1.1010 =0.27%, or 27 basis points.

The LIBOR square is a (rare) derivative contract which pays, as mentioned in the question, the square of the interest rate move between two dates. If LIBOR at inception is y, and upon settlement is x, the contract pays (x - y)^2 for x > y; and -(x - y)^2 for x < y.

For any question that involves calculating delta or gamma, and the payoff is described in terms of variables as is the case here, remember that delta is always the first derivative and gamma is the second derivative. For this question, let us calculate the second derivative and see what the gamma is:

If x > y, then the payoff is (x - y)^2

The first derivative wrt x is 2(x - y)

The second derivative wrt x is 2.

ie, the gamma is 2

If x < y, then the payoff is -(x - y)^2

The first derivative wrt x is -2(x - y)

The second derivative wrt x is -2.

ie, the gamma is -2

If x = y, then the payoff is 0. Both the first and the second derivatives are zero. ie the gamma is 0.

Based on the above, we see that the contract can have a gamma of either 0, +2 or -2. 1 is not a possible value for gamma, and therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.

Short calls and short puts have negative gamma, ie their delta increases at a decreasing rate as the price of the underlying change. Likewise, remember that long calls and long puts have positive gamma.

If $x be the spot price of oil, then in order for the forward price to be $75, the following relationship must hold: ($x + $4/(1.06))*(1 + 6%) = $75. Solving, we get x = $66.98

The delta of an at-the-money call option is close to 0.5. It is close to 1 when it is deep in the money. It is close to 0 when it is deep out of the money. It is never negative. Therefore Choice 'b' is the correct answer.