Practice Free PEGACPRSA22V1 Certified Pega Robotics System Architect 22 Exam Questions Answers With Explanation

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

When working with UI controls such as combo boxes in a custom user interface (Windows form or User Interaction form), you can expose their methods and events by dragging the control from the Palette or Object Explorer to the automation design surface.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Accessing Control Methods and Properties in Automations”:

“To access a control’s methods or events in an automation, drag the control (such as a combo box or text box) from the Object Explorer or Palette to the automation surface.

The Select Action dialog box appears, allowing you to filter and choose the specific method or event (for example, AddItem, RemoveItem, or Clear).”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Drag the combo box to the automation surface... – Correct. This opens the Select Action dialog, exposing all available methods and events for that control.

B. Open the Globals tab... – Incorrect. The combo box methods are not global; they belong to a specific UI form.

C. Select the combo box in a design form... – Incorrect. This action edits UI layout, not automation logic.

D. Select the combo box in the Palette tab... – Incorrect. The properties grid shows attributes, not callable methods.

When debugging automations in Pega Robot Studio, developers use specific function keys to control the flow of execution at breakpoints. Each key provides a distinct method for navigating through the automation logic during a debugging session.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Debugging Automations — Function Keys and Breakpoint Navigation”:

“During debugging, Pega Robot Studio allows you to step through the automation’s logic using three primary navigation commands:

F10 (Step Over): Executes the current step and proceeds to the next event or data link, without stepping into nested automations or sub-events.

F11 (Step Into): Executes the current step and enters any nested event link or sub-automation to debug internal logic.

F5 (Continue): Continues running the automation until the next breakpoint is encountered.”

Detailed Reasoning:

F10 – Step Over

Moves to the next automation event or data link at the same level.

Skips over nested or child automations while still executing them.

F11 – Step Into

Moves into the next automation event link or nested automation to debug its internal process.

Useful when you need to analyze detailed event flow inside another automation.

F5 – Continue

Resumes automation execution at normal speed until it encounters the next breakpoint or finishes.

Used to verify execution results after setting conditional breakpoints.

Final Correct Matching:

Navigation Rule

Function Key

Proceed to the next automation event or data link.

F10

Proceed to the next automation event link.

F11

Continue running the automation until the next breakpoint is reached.

F5

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

The Lookup Table is a global component in Pega Robot Studio that can be accessed from multiple automations within a project.

To use its methods—such as ImportDelimitedFile, FindRecord, or AddRecord—you must drag the lookup table instance from the Globals section to the automation surface.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Using Lookup Tables in Automations”:

“Lookup tables are global components that store data used across automations.

To call lookup table methods, drag the table from the Globals section of the Palette to the automation design surface.

The Select Action dialog box will open, allowing you to filter and select from available methods such as ImportDelimitedFile, FindRecord, and ClearTable.”

Detailed Reasoning:

A. Select the ImportDelimitedFile method in a design form... – Incorrect. The lookup table is not part of the UI form.

B. Drag the lookup table from the Locals section... – Incorrect. Lookup tables exist under Globals, not Locals.

C. Open the Globals tab and filter... – Incorrect. You must drag the component onto the automation surface to expose its methods.

D. Drag the lookup table from the Globals section... – Correct. This exposes the ImportDelimitedFile method through the Select Action dialog.

Application discovery is an early technical validation step that involves collecting the information about applications in scope of a potential robotics use case. During discovery you need to find out application types (and if they are on applications support matrix for Pega Robotics), how they are launched, how they are used, and check accessibility and functionality of the controls through interrogation. Application discovery is necessary to ensure that robotics use case is viable and it doesn't have any technical constraints... or, if constraints exist, then what kind of workarounds will be necessary to ensure the use case is successful. The rationale for having application discovery as a best practice is that you don't want to find out half-way through coding an automation that a key control is not available or not performing the desired action.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, the StartMethod and Path properties determine how an adapter attaches to or launches a target application. When interrogating applications, these configurations must be correctly defined for Robot Studio to recognize and interact with the application’s user interface elements.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, in the section “Application Adapter Properties and Interrogation Settings”, it states:

“The StartMethod property defines how Pega Robot Studio connects to or starts an application.

When using the ‘MonitorAll’ method, Robot Studio does not start the application automatically; instead, it waits for an existing instance of the application to be detected at runtime.

If the ‘Path’ property is undefined when using MonitorAll, the adapter has no reference to locate or attach to the running process, preventing interrogation of controls.”

Detailed Reasoning:

The MonitorAll StartMethod is typically used to attach to an already running application rather than launching a new instance.

For this to function correctly, Robot Studio needs to know which process to monitor, and that is determined by the Path property (the executable location of the target application).

If the Path property is missing or left undefined, Robot Studio cannot identify which process to monitor, even though the application may appear to launch.

As a result, the bullseye tool will not function because no valid application handle is established for interrogation.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — StartAndWait requires both the executable and window parameters, but the symptom here points specifically to an undefined Path under MonitorAll.

B. Incorrect — StartOnProject determines whether the app launches with the project, not whether it can be interrogated.

C. Incorrect — Start with undefined TargetPath would prevent the app from launching, but the question states the app does load.

D. Correct — Using MonitorAll without a defined Path prevents Robot Studio from attaching to the process, disabling interrogation.

Therefore, the correct answer is D — the StartMethod on the application is set to MonitorAll, but the Path property is undefined.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, the DataTableProxy component acts as an intermediary between automations and a Data Table, allowing the automation to read, manipulate, and update tabular data stored in the project.

When you drag an element such as a DataTableProxy from the Globals section of the Palette onto the automation design surface, Pega Robot Studio presents the user with available actions (methods, properties, or events) that can be executed using that component. This is done through a Select Action dialog box, which lists all available methods associated with the DataTableProxy (e.g., GetTable, AddRow, RemoveRow, Find, Update, etc.).

From the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Data Table Proxy and Data Handling section):

“When a component such as a DataTableProxy or connector object is dragged from the Palette onto the automation design surface, the system opens the Select Action dialog box.

This dialog lists all available methods and properties of the selected object, allowing the developer to select the action to instantiate on the automation surface.

The dialog ensures developers can directly add the desired operation (such as GetTable or UpdateRow) without manually searching through the object’s members.”

Detailed Reasoning:

The DataTableProxy represents a data-handling object; it does not directly add a “property” or “method” by default when dragged.

Instead, Robot Studio prompts you with a Select Action dialog box, allowing you to choose which specific method (like GetTable, FindRow, or AddRow) you want to include in your automation.

After the selection is made, the chosen method (for example, GetTable) is then displayed on the automation surface.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — A property is not automatically added; you must choose an action first.

B. Incorrect — The Quick Add dialog is used for linking variables and not for proxy components.

C. Incorrect — A “proxy design block” is not automatically added without specifying a method.

D. Correct — The Select Action dialog box opens to let you choose the method or property to add.

E. Incorrect — GetTable may be one of the options available, but it is not added automatically.

Hence, the correct answer is D — dragging a DataTableProxy from the Globals section triggers the Select Action dialog box to open, allowing the developer to choose which action to use.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega Robot Studio, the Credential Manager is designed to securely store user credentials (such as usernames and passwords) in an encrypted form within the user’s local profile. When properly configured, Pega Robotics can automatically log in to target applications without creating a separate automation.

From the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide (Application Configuration and Credential Management section):

“When an application requires credential-based authentication, developers can configure the application’s login controls during interrogation and assign the appropriate credential properties (Username and Password).

Once defined, credentials are stored securely in the user’s local profile and automatically retrieved and decrypted during runtime to perform the login without explicit automation logic.”

Detailed Reasoning:

During interrogation, the login controls (such as username and password fields) are identified and linked to the credential properties of the application object.

Pega Robotics automatically handles the retrieval and secure decryption of credentials stored in the local user profile at runtime.

This eliminates the need for any manual automation steps or scripts for logging in.

Option Analysis:

A. Incorrect — Robot activities are server-executed tasks, not used for local application authentication.

B. Incorrect — Credentials must be configured after interrogating target controls to map them correctly.

C. Correct — Interrogating the login fields and setting the application credential properties allows Pega Robotics to securely manage and automate login automatically.

D. Incorrect — Creating a script defeats the purpose of using the built-in credential manager.

Thus, Option C is the correct method for configuring automatic login using encrypted credentials.

Pega Robotics Studio – Automation Design Concepts (Entry/Exit Points & Parameters)

“An automation can expose multiple exit points (for example, Success and Failure) and can define output parameters that return values to the caller. When the automation completes, the appropriate exit point is raised and the output parameters are made available to the caller.”

Pega Robotics Studio – Calling Automations (Run and Parameter Mapping)

“When one automation calls another, the called automation appears as a component with input parameters, output parameters, and exit points. The caller wires the Success/Failure exits to the next steps and maps output parameters (for example, result, errCode) to downstream logic.”

Why Option C is correct:

The UpdateCustomerDetails block in Option C clearly shows two exit points — Success and Failure — and two output parameters — result and errCode — on the subautomation.

The wiring demonstrates a typical pattern:

On Success, the flow proceeds to a success path with result available.

On Failure, the flow proceeds to a failure path with errCode available (the extra, unused result pin on the failure jump is permissible but not required).

This matches the specification precisely: two exits (Success/Failure) and two outputs (result, errCode).

Why the other options are not correct:

Option A: Shows errCode but does not expose result clearly as an output to the success path.

Option B: The component does not display errCode as an output parameter of the subautomation.

Option D: Emphasizes an additional boolean/conditional output and maps result on the failure path, which does not reflect the stated definition of the subautomation outputs.

Document Sources (Exact Extracts Reference):

Pega Robotics Studio User Guide — Automation Design Concepts: Entry/Exit Points and Parameters.

Pega Robotics Studio User Guide — Calling Automations and Mapping Inputs/Outputs.

Pega Robotics System Certification Study Material — Subautomation design patterns (Success/Failure with output parameters).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

According to Pega Robotics Studio – Matching and Interrogation Tools Documentation:

“Matching defines how a control is identified at runtime. When application hierarchies change or specific match rules fail, Robot Studio provides diagnostic tools to reestablish and verify the correct control associations.”

The guide specifies the following tools and their purpose:

Refresh Matching

“Refresh Matching updates the control’s properties and hierarchy information based on the current application structure without re-interrogating the control. This tool is useful when an application’s DOM or hierarchy has changed.”

Debug Matching

“Debug Matching opens the Match Rules Diagnostics window and evaluates each match rule in real-time to show which rules pass or fail. It assists in identifying which match rule must be corrected or replaced.”

By contrast:

Replace Matching – Recreates the match rules from scratch (not the preferred first step).

Replace Control – Reinterrogates the entire control and removes existing references (used only when the control is entirely invalid).

Debug Control – Analyzes properties but not matching logic.

Thus, the two correct tools to address the described issues are:

Refresh Matching (for hierarchy change)

Debug Matching (for failed rule troubleshooting)

References (Exact Extract Source):

Pega Robotics Studio – Matching Diagnostics and Interrogation Guide

Pega Robotics System Architect Training – Debugging and Refresh Matching Modules

Pega Robotics Help – Managing Match Rules in Chrome/Edge/Web Adapters

Final Verified Answer: A, C

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

In Pega, when a data page is configured with a Robotic Desktop Automation (RDA) as its source, the automation must complete execution and return its response within a predefined timeout period. The default timeout value for data pages calling robotic automations is 60 seconds.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Data Page Integration with Robotic Desktop Automations”:

“When a Pega data page calls a robotic automation as its data source, the automation must complete and return its data within the timeout threshold.

If the automation’s execution time exceeds the timeout period (default 60 seconds), the data page fails to receive the response, resulting in an empty or incomplete data return to Pega Platform.”

Detailed Reasoning:

If the automation executes successfully but takes longer than the defined timeout, the Pega Platform assumes the call failed and releases the data page before the response arrives.

This causes the data page not to be populated, even though the Robot Studio logs show successful automation completion.

Increasing the timeout value or optimizing automation performance typically resolves this issue.

Option Analysis:

A. The automation runs longer than the default data page timeout of 60 seconds.

Correct. Exceeding the timeout prevents the data page from capturing the automation’s response.

B. The robot activity ClassName property value is incorrect.

Incorrect. This would prevent the automation from running entirely, not delay the response.

C. The automation runs faster than the data page can perform a data transform.

Incorrect. Pega manages data transforms synchronously after data retrieval, so this is not applicable.

D. The automation does not return the proper SetCompletionStatus.

Incorrect. If completion status were missing, the automation would fail altogether, not time out.

Therefore, the issue occurs because the automation execution exceeds the default 60-second data page timeout.

In Pega Robot Studio, when an automation (especially one invoked as a robot activity by Pega Platform) finishes execution, it must return a Completion Status. This status helps the Pega Platform determine the outcome of the automation and decide whether to continue the workflow, retry, or handle an exception.

According to the Pega Robotics System Design and Implementation Guide, section “Robot Activity Completion Status and Workflow Integration”:

“Each robotic activity returns a Completion Status to the Pega Platform after execution.

The completion status communicates the final outcome of the automation’s operation, indicating whether it successfully completed, encountered errors, or produced invalid data.

The most common statuses used are:

Complete: The automation ran successfully, and data passed all validation checks.

DidNotComplete: The automation ran to completion, but business validation failed or data was deemed invalid.

CompletedWithErrors: The automation could not complete execution due to a system or process error.”

Detailed Reasoning:

Complete

Indicates that the robotic automation successfully executed and the resulting data passed all validation checks within Pega.

This allows the Pega case flow to continue normally.

Correct Match: “If data passes business validation, the processing flow continues.”

CompletedWithErrors

Used when the automation fails to complete due to a technical issue or system error (for example, an application did not load or a connector failed).

This causes the flow to route as a failure in Pega.

Correct Match: “If the automation fails to complete, it routes as a failure.”

DidNotComplete

Indicates that the automation successfully executed technically but failed business validation, such as incorrect data, missing inputs, or business rule mismatches.

Correct Match: “If the automation completes processing, but the data fails business validation.”

Final Correct Matching Order:

Completion Status

Automation Description

Complete

If data passes business validation, the processing flow continues.

CompletedWithErrors

If the automation fails to complete, it routes as a failure.

DidNotComplete

If the automation completes processing, but the data fails business validation.