CTAL-ATT Practice Exam Questions with Answers Certified Tester Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Certification

 Exploratory testing is a type of testing that emphasizes the personal freedom and responsibility of the individual tester to continually optimize the quality of his/her work by treating test-related learning, test design, test execution, and test result interpretation as mutually supportive activities that run in parallel throughout the project. While exploratory testing can be highly effective in certain contexts, for safety-critical systems, it is generally not recommended. Safety-critical systems require a high degree of assurance and predictability that each component of the system behaves as expected under all circumstances. Manual black-box tests, which are more structured and can be thoroughly planned and documented, are preferred in these scenarios to ensure comprehensive coverage and traceability.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus and training materials provide guidance on the appropriate use of different testing techniques in various contexts, including the recommendation of structured manual black-box testing over exploratory testing for safety-critical systems1234.

Table 2 provides the best test coverage because it includes tests for adding a non-existent member (Member4), which should result in an error, and it also tests for removing a member and then deleting the group, which is the correct sequence of actions according to the requirements. The other tables either do not test all the required scenarios or have actions in thewrong order (e.g., attempting to delete the group before removing all members). References = ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and Training resources.

In a reactive test approach, tests are designed and executed in response to the actual system under test and the results obtained. This approach is characterized by a reduced planning cycle, and the design and implementation of test phases are not carried out until the test object is received. For projects that need to adhere to external regulations, it is crucial that automated tests and their results are traceable back to the requirements to ensure compliance. This traceability allows for the verification that all requirements have been tested and met, which is a common requirement in regulated industries.

References = The explanation aligns with the principles of test automation in a reactive test approach, as outlined in resources related to the ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester certification123. These resources emphasize the importance of traceability in test automation, especially in contexts where compliance with external regulations is necessary.

 For a Medium risk mission- or safety-critical system, a combination of automated, exploratory, and manual black-box tests is recommended. Automated tests ensure consistent and efficient coverage of known scenarios, while exploratory tests allow testers to investigate and discover unknown issues. Manual black-box tests are important for verifying the system from an end-user perspective without knowledge of the internal workings, which is crucial for safety-critical systems. References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus and materials emphasize the importance of a comprehensive testing approach that includes various techniques suitable for the system’s risk level and criticality123

 In the context of Agile Technical Testing, when a test class fails, the immediate next step is to repair the failing code. This aligns with the Agile principle of fast feedback and continuous improvement. The failing test indicates that the current implementation does not meet the specified criteria, hence the need to correct the code. Once the code is repaired, it should be re-executed to verify that the test now passes, ensuring that the validation criterion is met.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester materials emphasize the importance of quick iterations and prompt responses to test failures. This approach helps maintain the momentum of the development process and ensures that issues are addressed as soon as they are identified1

Continuous testing in Agile involves automatically executing a pre-defined set of tests with every new build of the system. This practice is part of continuous integration and delivery, ensuring that new changes are verified quickly and frequently, which is essential for Agile’s fast-paced and iterative development cycles. References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus emphasizes the importance of continuous testing in Agile projects, highlighting techniques such as test automation, continuous deployment, and delivery as fundamental to the Agile approach123.

Increasing test automation is a key practice in Agile methodologies to support continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD). Automated tests can be run quickly and frequently, which is essential for continuous deployment to be effective. By automating the testing process, teams can ensure that new code changes are tested thoroughly and consistently, leading to more frequent and reliable deployments to production.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents emphasize the importance of test automation in Agile contexts, particularly in relation to continuous deployment and delivery1. It is highlighted that test automation approaches are fundamental for organizations adopting Agile development practices12345.

Story mapping is the most effective requirements engineering technique for identifying and prioritizing user stories related to the epic mentioned. It allows the team to visualize the entire customer journey, which is crucial for a content management system that aims to enhance the content editing and publishing process. By mapping out the user stories, the team can see how they fit into the overall system, prioritize them based on the value they provide to the end-users, and ensure that all necessary functionalities are covered.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester materials discuss the use of various requirements engineering techniques in an Agile context. Story mapping, in particular, is highlighted as a valuable method for organizing and prioritizing user stories to create a shared understanding among the team members123.

Test automation is indeed a strategy. It is a set of methods and practices that are part of a larger testing approach, aimed at improving efficiency and effectiveness in testing activities. Test automation involves the use of specialized software to control the execution of tests, compare the actual outcomes with predicted outcomes, set up test preconditions, and other test control and test reporting functions12. It is not merely a procedure or a single objective, but rather a comprehensive approach that can encompass various techniques, tools, and processes to achieve the desired testing outcomes within an Agile project. The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus and learning resources emphasize the strategic role of test automation in supporting continuous integration and delivery, and in enabling Agile teams to maintain the pace of rapid deployments12.

References =

• ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Syllabus1
• ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Learning Objectives2

Please ensure to refer to the latest ISTQB documents and resources for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

Service virtualization can be highly beneficial in a continuous testing environment, especially when dealing with external services that incur costs per transaction. By creating a virtualized service that mimics the behavior of the bank’s application, the project can avoid the transaction fees that would otherwise be charged for each test execution. This not only reduces the cost of testing but also allows for more frequent and comprehensive testing without the concern of incurring high expenses.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus outlines the importance of understanding service virtualization concepts as part of supporting test automation activities in an Agile project12. It is a key technique to ensure tests provide adequate coverage without the additional costs associated with using real services1.

 Refactoring of test cases in agile projects is primarily done to ensure that the test cases remain relevant and effective as the functionality of the product evolves. This process involves updating and improving the test cases to match the current state of the product’s functionality. The main benefits of this practice include enhancing the quality and effectiveness of regression test cases and ensuring that the tests continue to align with the code base and product functionality. This alignment is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the testing process and ensuring that the tests accurately reflect the product’s requirements and behavior.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus and related materials emphasize the importance of refactoring test cases in agile projects. It is highlighted as a necessary activity to adapt to changes in functionality and to maintain the relevance and effectiveness of the test suite1.

The TDD process, as described, seems to lack comprehensive testing that covers all the acceptance criteria. Specifically, the tests provided by the developers do not address the full range of input validation, such as ensuring that names with up to 30 characters are accepted and that standard error processing is in place to limit user errors. This indicates that the tests are insufficient and need to include more options to fully validate the feature against its acceptance criteria. The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus emphasizes the importance of creating testable acceptance criteria within an Agile team and implementing various Agile test approaches using appropriate techniques12. It also highlights the need for supporting and contributing to test automation activities in an Agile project12, which includes ensuring that all acceptance criteria are met and that tests are sufficiently robust to catch potential errors.

References =

• ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Syllabus1
• ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester Learning Objectives2

In a regression-averse test approach, the focus of test automation is on actively managing the risk of regression by continuously improving and updating the existing set of tests12. This involves designing reusable test support and extensive automation of testing at one or more test levels to ensure that as the software evolves, the test suite remains effective in catching regressions.

References = The answer is verified based on the ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and resources available on ISTQB’s official website, which discuss the principles of test automation in an Agile context, including the importance of maintaining and enhancing test suites to manage regression risks34.

The most efficient and effective approach to test automation execution in a CI environment, given the constraints of time and the need to review test results, is to prioritize tests based on their importance and the frequency of builds. Running high priority tests on each build ensures that critical features work as expected with every change. Medium priority tests can be run nightly to catch issues that may not be as urgent but still important. Low priority tests can be run weekly, which allows for a broader test coverage over time without overburdening the daily build process. Lastly, running non-functional tests in the integrated stage environment on the Thursday night before the end of the sprint aligns with the need for these tests to be in a more stable and integrated setting, while also ensuring that they are conducted before the sprint’s completion123.

References = This answer is supported by the ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and the principles of test automation execution efficiency45. Additionally, resources from Software Testing Help provide insights into best practices for test automation strategy and execution67.

The testable acceptance criteria for the user story are those that can be verified through testing to ensure they meet the user’s needs and the system’s functionality. In this case:

• Criterion (i) is testable because you can verify the payment methods.
• Criterion (ii) is testable as you can check if the acknowledgement email is sent after form submission.
• Criterion (iv) is testable by confirming that the information is stored in the database correctly.

Criteria (iii) and (v), while important, are not explicitly testable from the user story’s perspective without further clarification on how spam protection is measured and what constitutes ‘incorrect’ user inputs.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester materials emphasize the importance of creating testable acceptance criteria that are clear, measurable, and verifiable within the context of the user story12. This ensures that the developed feature meets the user’s requirements and functions as intended2.

BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) and ATDD (Acceptance Test-Driven Development) are most commonly associated with the Analytical test approach. This approach involves a detailed examination of the requirements, specifications, and other documentation to derive test conditions and cases. BDD and ATDD focus on defining the expected behavior of a system through collaboration between stakeholders, which aligns with the analytical approach’s emphasis on thorough requirement analysis and understanding before test execution.

References = The ISTQB materials describe BDD and ATDD as techniques that fit within an analytical approach due to their reliance on detailed requirement analysis and collaboration among team members to define acceptance criteria and behavior specifications12.

When test cases are re-run after refactoring, it is essential to verify that they provide the same results as before. This ensures that the refactoring has not introduced any new defects and that the existing functionality remains intact. Refactoring is meant to improve the design, structure, or implementation of the software while preserving its functionality, so the test cases should continue to pass as they did prior to the refactoring.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents emphasize the importance of maintaining the integrity of test cases during agile projects, including after refactoring activities1.

 The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus suggests that after a successful proof of concept (POC), it is important to expand the Continuous Integration (CI) process to handle various test configurations. This is especially relevant for a product deployed across different hardware configurations in Europe. By enabling different test configurations in the CI process, you can ensure that the product works correctly on all the hardware configurations it will encounter in the market. This step is crucial for maintaining the quality and reliability of the product in diverse environments.

References = ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and Training resources12.