L4M5 Practice Exam Questions with Answers Commercial Negotiation Certification

With non-critical commodity products, the relationship will be transactional. Buyer should not spend too much time and effort into the negotiation.

LO 1, AC 1.4

Effective listening is crucial in integrative negotiations as it fosters mutual understanding and helps identify shared interests, leading to collaborative solutions. It enables negotiators to comprehend the other party's needs and concerns fully.

In a globalised commercial world characterised by dynamic market and multiple companies competing for business, a positive corporate reputation can be an enormous asset. Reputational strength in one organisation might be based on some or all of the following characteristics:

- Quality of products or services

- Low cost/high value for money

- High ethical standards

- Reliability

- Cutting-edge technology

- Strong customer focus

- Engineering excellence

LO 1, AC 1.4

Open questions begin with “how,” “what,” “why,” etc., and are designed to encourage detailed responses. The supplier’s questions are open-ended and aim to gather comprehensive feedback, which can inform better mutual understanding and potential deal improvements.

Trust is built through consistent communication (e.g., regular meetings) and fulfilling commitments (keeping promises). Coercion erodes trust, while mediation is reactive and not a foundational element of trust-building.

Integrative (win-win) negotiation looks for value-equivalent tradeables across the bargaining mix (price, service, warranty, aftercare, etc.). If the same total saving is achieved via aftercare—and the buyer needs it—accepting the tradeable meets objectives without forcing a distributive fight on unit price.

Macroeconomic indicators are statistics or data readings that reflect the economic circumstances of a particular country, region or sector. They are used by analysts and governments to assess the current and future health of the economy and financial markets.

Macroeconomic indicators will vary in their meaning and the impact that they have on the economy, but broadly speaking there are two main types of indicator.

- Leading indicators, which forecast where an economy might be heading. They are often used by governments to implement policies because they represent the first phase of a new economic cycle. These include the yield curve, interest rates and share prices.

- Lagging indicators, which reflect an economy’s historical performance and only change after a trend has been established. They are used to confirm a trend is underway. These include gross domestic product (GDP), inflation and employment figures.

There is also the category of coincident indicators, but these are generally grouped in with lagging indicators as they either happen at the same time or after an economic shift.

The best macroeconomic indicator to watch will heavily depend on your personal preferences, what positions you are taking and which country your portfolio is focused on. However, there are some very common indicators that most traders and investors will keep an eye on.

For simplicity’s sake, we have split these out into leading and lagging indicators.

Top leading indicators:

1. The stock market

2. House prices

3. Bond yields

4. Production and manufacturing statistics

5. Retail sales

6. Interest rates

Top lagging indicators:

1. GDP growth rates

2. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and inflation

3. Currency strength and stability

4. Labour market statistics

5. Commodity prices

A procurement professional may find stock market data from the security exchange, while most lagging indicators (such as GDP, CPI, unemployment rate, currency and inflation rate, etc) can be found from government statistics data.

Dynamic pricing is the practice of dynamically calculating the price of a product or service in order to incorporate real-time market conditions, input costs, and/or competitive perspectives. Dynamic pricing which is based on marginal costing, is used by airlines and many other organisations.

Marginal cost is the cost of producing an additional unit of output. Marginal Costing is a costing technique wherein the marginal cost, i.e. variable cost is charged to units of cost, while the fixed cost for the period is completely written off against the contribution.

The broken record tactic involves repeating the same point to reinforce a position, making it difficult for the other party to ignore. Here, the buyer keeps citing budget constraints to avoid moving away from their position, hoping repetition will wear down the supplier’s resistance. This tactic is common in distributive bargaining and aims to anchor discussions around a fixed limitation. While effective, overuse risks damaging relationships, so skilled negotiators balance it with genuine reasoning and integrative approaches when appropriate.

The assumption is false, because when a procurement professional negotiates on behalf of his employer, he brings the power of his organisation (its brand, reputation and purchasing spend) as well his own personal power (that which is embedded within him) to the negotiation.

From a negotiation perspective, both organisational and personal power have the ability to influence the behaviours of other or the cause of event. This power is clearly core to negotiation, and of enormous important in seeking to achieve the objectives.

While face-to-face meetings are beneficial, declining all other forms of interaction can hinder progress. Telephone calls can be effective in early negotiation stages to build rapport and set expectations. Conditioning the client through initial calls is a common and productive practice.

The coercive power comes from the belief that a person can punish others for non-compliance. It can be considered as opposite to reward power, which results from one person's ability to compensate or reward another for compliance.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Variable costs change in proportion to production volume, such as packaging, raw materials, and delivery. Fixed costs (rent, insurance, loan repayments) remain constant regardless of output. Recognising the difference is crucial when negotiating supplier pricing, as variable costs are often more open to tradeable adjustments (e.g., bulk discounts). Buyers who understand cost structures can challenge inflated fixed allocations or negotiate on genuine variable elements. This knowledge is vital in price breakdown discussions and in cost-modelling negotiations.

Legitimate power in negotiation can arise from different sources:

Position power (authority from role/position in the organisation).

Referent power (influence from respect, charisma, or relationships).

In the scenario, the main cost driver is suppliers' mark-up. The priority should be limit the margin to be added. XYZ Ltd can agree “cost plus” contracts with their suppliers to ensure no IT product purchased exceeds an agreed maximum margin level. Procurement teams can use their benchmarking tools to police these contracts. Cost plus contracts are agreements where the contractor's pricing is based on itemising allowable costs and then adding an agreed margin.

Market penetration pricing - pricing low to win a large share of the market

Market skimming - pricing a new product high in order to make a large profit from the purchases by initial customers. This is an effective strategy only in the absence of competition.When competition appears, market skimmers usually drop their prices

Premium pricing - usually pricing high because the market is prepared to pay extra for the kudos associated with the product, thanks to, say, a reputation for quality, or a highly fashionable brand name, and so on

Building rapport sets apositive tonefor the negotiation and encourages openness. It is particularly vital during theopening phase, where first impressions are formed, and trust begins to build. Trust facilitates moreconstructive dialogue, enhances collaboration, and helps parties exploremutual interests.

“Developing rapport at the start of negotiations helps to foster trust and cooperation. This enhances the likelihood of reaching agreements that are mutually beneficial.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.4 - The Opening Phase and Relationship Building)

Contextual (environmental) power includes home-ground advantage, control of the venue, access to colleagues and data, and comfort with logistics—all of which can tilt confidence and leverage toward the host (the buyer).

Integrative negotiation requires shared motivation to collaborate and focus on joint benefits. When parties are motivated to work together, they can share data, explore tradeables, and align on long-term value creation. Conversely, lack of trust, unwillingness to share, or absence of joint goals make integrative approaches unworkable, forcing adversarial or distributive methods instead. CIPS highlights that motivation and willingness to cooperate are preconditions for collaboration.

Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative. When collaborating, an individual attempts to work with the other person to find a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of both. It involves digging into an issue to identify the underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find an alternative that meets both sets of concerns. Collaborating between two persons might take the form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each other’s insights, resolving some conditionthat would otherwise have them competing for resources, or confronting and trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem.

Direct costs are expenses that can be clearly attributed to the production of specific goods. These typically include raw materials, direct labor, and other costs tied directly to the manufacturing process. They are variable with production volume and help procurement teams analyze pricing more effectively during negotiations.

Mark-up and margin allow supplier to make gross profit. Remember that every supplier operates under different cost structures and some are set up to be most profitable at a particular level of volume, so it is dangerous to assume all suppliers can survive on a lower margin if their volume increases. Intelligent buyers understand that mark-up and margin may define gross profits, but they tell you very little about a supplier's net profits.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Acollaborative win-win approachfocuses on mutual benefit and long-term value creation. This strategy is especially effective in strategic partnerships where trust, information sharing, and problem-solving are emphasized over competition.

“The collaborative win-win approach aims to create outcomes where both parties gain. This strengthens the relationship and leads to sustainable agreements built on trust and transparency.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Win-Win Negotiation Strategy)

In the scenario, anyone who has concerns can join a meeting to raise their thoughts. The project team takes the stakeholders' ideas into account. This is known as coalition: A group of people or organisations come together and work collaboratively to achieve some goals. Specifically in this scenario, the goal is creating a high-quality and unified specification for an important project.

In the scenario, the buyer states that permission from senior management is required to shorten payment period and she only has authority to sign off a deal in which the payment period lasts at least 30 days. The buyer is using lack of authority. The buyer also repeats the matter again throughout the negotiation. This is a common tactic known as broken record.

A distributive approach is appropriate when multiple suppliers offer similar products, as this competitive environment allows the buyer to focus on maximizing their position rather than building long-term partnerships. CIPS suggests that a distributive or competitive approach is best used in non-critical purchases or when supplier dependency is low, as is the case here.

A key consideration when seeking to negotiate prices is to establish what proportion of the spend is addressable by procurement action such as negotiation. Addressability of spend is influenceable through negotiations or application of other saving effort or leverage with suppliers.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Mark-up is defined as profit expressed as a percentage of the cost. It calculates the profit margin based on the cost price rather than the selling price, which allows companies to determine how much they are earning over their production or purchase costs. This aligns with standard accounting and CIPS definitions of mark-up in procurement contexts.

A partnership is characterised by trust, mutual respect, and joint sharing of risks and rewards. Both sides collaborate on innovation and improvement. In contrast, transactional or arm’s-length relationships are short-term and price-driven, while outsourcing simply transfers responsibility without guaranteeing collaboration. CIPS emphasises partnerships as enablers of integrative negotiations, where joint value and long-term benefits can be achieved.

In fixed-price agreements, cost-overrun risk is transferred to the supplier, giving the buyer price certainty and reducing the need for ongoing cost scrutiny. Monitoring focuses on delivery to specification and timing, not on the supplier’s internal cost build-up (unlike cost-plus).

The case in the question is illustrated as below:

The equilibrium price initially at P0 with quantity Q0, when supply curve shifts to the left, it will converge with demand curve at new equilibrium point with price P1 and quantity Q1. As you can see from the graph, P1 is greater than P0 and Q1 is smaller than Q0.

Rebuilding trust requires acknowledgement of the issue and supplier commitment to improvement. Cosmetic gestures such as hospitality or price reductions do not address the core problem. Nor should KPIs be artificially lowered, as this masks underperformance. Trust is restored when accountability is accepted and corrective actions are implemented transparently. This aligns with CIPS’ emphasis on trust-building behaviours: honesty, responsibility, and consistent performance.

As a financial metric, the margin of safety (safety margin) is equal to the difference between current or forecasted sales and sales at the break-even point. The margin of safety is sometimes reported as a ratio, in which the aforementioned formula is divided by current or forecasted sales to yield a percentage value. The figure is used in both break-even analysis and forecasting to inform a firm's management of the existing cushion in actual sales or budgeted sales before the firm would incur a loss.

This is a question that a student met in her actual exam. The margin of safety is not even mentioned in the CIPS study guide.

Essential goods and services such as electricity, fuel, basic food stuffs, commuter transport and habitual products such as tobacco, alcohol and sugar-based drinks are often sited as facing a relatively inelastic demand curve. This means when the price goes up, the quantity demanded does not decrease very much and so they are often the target of government taxation.

LO2, AC 2.2

The Win-Win approach is the most appropriate negotiation strategy in situations where collaboration and ongoing relationships are prioritized. In this case:

Achieving cost savings: The NHS aims to reduce expenses in order to reallocate funds to critical areas, making it essential that both parties work together to find cost-effective solutions.

Collaborative supplier relationship: Since Maria is working with a collaborative supplier, maintaining a positive relationship through mutual benefit is essential for continued cooperation.

Alignment with public service objectives: A Win-Win outcome aligns with the NHS's broader objectives of maximizing resources for patient care, as it ensures that savings are achieved without undermining the supplier’s commitment to quality service.

This approach aligns with CIPS guidelines for maintaining productive, ethical partnerships in procurement, especially in critical sectors like healthcare.

All one-to-one commercial negotiations between a specific purchaser and a specific supplier take place within an industrial market and a larger business environment characterised by multiple forces which both parties typically have little control over. STEEPLE framework highlights the 6 main external influences on a business:

LO 1, AC 1.3

According toMendelow’s Matrix, stakeholders withhigh interest but low powershould be keptinformed. Their interest means they care about the negotiation's outcome, but their low power means they can't significantly influence it. Keeping them informed avoids alienation and ensures smoother implementation of negotiated agreements.

“Stakeholders with high interest but low power should be managed by keeping them informed. They may become powerful advocates or opponents in the future, so engaging them is a strategic approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Stakeholder Management in Commercial Negotiations)

Published market indices are a source of macroeconomic data, as they reflect broader economic trends and provide insights into the overall market environment, which is essential for globalexpansion planning. Macroeconomic analysis focuses on high-level economic indicators, as recommended in CIPS’s guidelines on sourcing macroeconomic data.

'Macroeconomic factors always directly influence the negotiations': This statement is false. For any given negotiation it is not the macroeconomic factor itself that necessarily influences the negotiation but the change or rate of change that factor.

'Changes in macroeconomic factors may affect businesses and individuals differently': This statement is true. Macroeconomic factors are factors that have general effects on the economy and many businesses may be completely unaffected or affected more or less than others in the same industry by a change in a factor.

'Macroeconomic factors cannot be influenced by anyone's expectation or sentiment': This statement is false. When it comes to macroeconomic factors another key consideration is expectation regarding what might happen to these factors, or specifically the measures, metrics or percentage rates associated with these factors in the future.

'Expectations on macroeconomic prospect are always correct': This statement is false. Expectations are not always correct.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Market pricing sets prices according to consumer demand and willingness to pay, ensuring competitiveness. Skimming sets high prices at launch to maximise early profit, penetration uses low prices to enter markets, and premium pricing positions products as luxury with high margins. Market pricing balances supplier costs with customer value perception, making it a common approach in competitive industries.

Fixed price contract is the contract in which the price is static throughout the contract period. A fixed-price contract may give certainty to budget and simplify contract management. However, it may lead to other problems since it requires bidders to estimate and bear the financial risks associated with price escalations. If the estimates are too high or events do not materialize, the buyer will pay a steep price that may affect the economy and efficiency of the contract. In the worst case, it may mean that the bid price is then above budget and may lead to a reduction in the requirements or rebidding. If the estimates are too low, it may appear as an abnormally low bid and disrupt contract execution.

On the other hand, price adjustment provisions include formulas designed to address problems, and can protect both the borrower and contractors from price fluctuations. Price adjustment formulas allow contractors to offer more realistic prices at the time of bidding. Despite concerns that they may lead to budget uncertainties, price adjustment formulas will estimate the actual cost implications that will be encountered. They use indexes that can be used for cost projection.

According to Asia Development Bank (ADB), any contract with a delivery or completion period beyond 18 months should contain an appropriate price adjustment clause.

In the scenario, the crude oil contract is planned to last 36 months. This period is pretty long with a fluctuating commodity. Therefore, the company should use price adjustment agreement.

Adversarial relationships typically lead to distributive (win–lose) negotiations, where each party seeks maximum gain at the other’s expense. Trust is low, information is withheld, and concessions are hard-fought. While it can deliver short-term wins, it risks damaging long-term relationships and may reduce overall value. Collaborative, integrative approaches are more sustainable, but adversarial conditions often prevent them. CIPS highlights the importance of recognising relationship dynamics before selecting negotiation style, as forcing integrative approaches in adversarial contexts may be unrealistic.

Afixed price agreementprovides stability and predictability. The supplier bears the risk of cost fluctuations, which is especially advantageous in volatile markets. Moreover, it simplifies administrative processes for the buyer over the contract duration.

“Fixed price agreements transfer cost risk to the supplier and enable simplified contract management. This can reduce overhead for buyers and support budgeting accuracy.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models in Negotiation)

Essentially, for trained negotiators under most circumstances, the physical locations of negotiations and the room layout should not make much difference to the outcomes of the meeting. It is reasonable to assume that most commercial negotiations are based at least initially on a principled- or pragmatic-type approach. It is arguable also that any advantage gained through intentionally creating an uncomfortable environment to put short-term pressure on TOP is likely to be short-lived as TOP will likely reflect on this later and seek means to get even.

Commercial negotiation objectives should be driven by the business needs of the organisation. Organisations are made up of different stakeholder groups, some of whom may have different, even conflicting objectives. From a negotiation perspective, stakeholders can be defined as persons or groups that have interest (or stake) in the outcome of the negotiation you are leading or participating in.

CIPS distinguishes between 3 sets of stakeholders:

- Internal stakeholders

- Connected stakeholders

- External stakeholders

End-users are examples of internal stakeholders. They are the people who will benefit from the purchase of a product or service. However, their interest may conflict with other groups, i.e. thebudget controllers whose objective is minimising the expense. In negotiation perspective, procurement should involve different groups of stakeholder.

LO 1, AC 1.1

In microeconomics, equilibrium price is determined when the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity supplied at equilibrium price in a market, there will be no shortages and no surpluses. If we combine our supply and demand curves on one graph, the point at which they converge determines the equilibrium price. If the price is set above this price and you read across the graph you will see the supply excess demand and there will be a surplus. In order to reduce this surplus, the price will need to fall. The scenario is illustrated in the graph below:

Chart, line chart Description automatically generated

The bargaining power of buyers increases when the buyer is large relative to the supplier. A large buyer can leverage its size to negotiate more favorable terms due to its significant impact on the supplier's business. CIPS notes that a buyer’s size and purchasing volume are key factors that enhance its negotiating power in buyer-supplier relationships.

Closed questions are designed to elicit specific, factual responses — typically “yes” or “no” or a brief piece of information. These are particularly useful when verifying details during negotiation. For example, asking “Did you receive the revised schedule on Monday?” ensures clarity and reduces ambiguity.

Trust develops when organisations consistently deliver on commitments—meeting deadlines, respecting terms, and fulfilling promises. While audits, contract management, and data gathering support oversight, they do not in themselves build trust. In collaborative negotiations, reliability becomes the foundation of long-term partnerships, reducing the need for constant monitoring. CIPS highlights that trust is fragile and must be reinforced through transparency, consistent behaviour, and alignment of actions with words. This credibility is more persuasive than any formal monitoring.

Direct costs are those costs that can be directly attributed to the production of specific goods or services. They typically include raw materials and labor directly involved in production. Metal used in the product is a raw material that becomes part of the final product, making it a direct cost.

Personal poweris derived from an individual's unique qualities or expertise. It differs from positional power, which is based on job title or authority.Legitimate powerstems from an official position of authority, whileexpert poweris based on skills, knowledge, and credibility. These are both commonly used by procurement professionals to influence outcomes in negotiations.

“Expert power arises from experience, qualifications, or specialist knowledge that is recognised and respected by others. Legitimate power stems from a formal position or role within an organisation.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.1 - Sources of Power in Negotiation)

Note: Strategic and leverage power are more aligned with organisational positioning and external factors, not personal influence.

Negotiation doesn't end after the contract is awarded. The needs for negotiation can arise in any post-award stages. For example, at supplier development and relationship management stage,improvement in supplier capability, capacity, and product/service range can be negotiated. Negotiations with long-term strategic critical suppliers should be carried out in a partnering style, with a win-win starting point assumed.

In some sectors such as transport, utilities and infrastructure, tenderers may 'bid low' or even make a loss to win major contracts with a view to negotiating lucrative changes, variations and 'add-ons' over the life of the contract when the supplier is bedded in and the buyer is in the weaker position to push back or challenge. Even in less complex contract, it is very likely that there will be a need to negotiate with that supplier again after the awarding of the contract.

LO 1, AC 1.1

There are 5 key phases of negotiation:

The opening phase: confirm understanding and get the issue on the table

The testing phase: check assumption and confirm understanding

The proposing phase: asking 'if'

The bargaining phase: using tradeables

The agreement and closing phase

The testing could take the form of questions following a presentation by either side or questions on a tender or proposal document received by the buyer from the potential supplier. The testing phase is necessary to confirm that your approach and objectives are appropriate for the negotiation situation you now find yourself in. Careful listening, observation and interpretation of TOP's responses may give indication of the following:

Areas where TOP is willing and unwilling to make concessions

What factors or issues TOP places a high value on

If there are any non-commercial or emotional factors that may be pertinent

TOP's underlying interests - why they are taking the position they are.

Negotiating at the supplier's site can give the supplier a psychological advantage due to their familiarity with the setting. To ensure a neutral and balanced negotiation environment, it’s preferable to conduct negotiations in a neutral location or through structured channels, as recommended in CIPS's guidance on negotiation settings.

At the proposing phase either side may start making tentative proposals regarding their offering. In the case of negotiation where TOP has already submitted a tender or proposal, this stage may provide an opportunity for them to make proposals to improve on their initial offers in general or in areas highlighted by the buying side in advance.

The word 'if' is very useful at this stage and allows you to test tentative proposals without committing yourself. Skilled negotiators use language very carefully. The questions with 'if' are hypothetical ones.

LO 3, AC 3.1

Mark-upis calculated as:

Mark-up %=(ProfitCost)×100\text{Mark-up \%} = \left( \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Cost}} \right) \times 100Mark-up %=(CostProfit?)×100

In this case:

Profit = $240 - $160 = $80

Cost = $160

Mark-up = (80 / 160) × 100 =50%

“Understanding mark-up percentages helps in assessing supplier pricing behaviour and negotiating realistic margins.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models and Profit Margins)

Developing specific negotiation strategies in areas where risk or spend is high involves analysing a wide range of objectives and variables within the context of the organisation's business requirements. The first stage in any negotiation preparation is to define your overall objectives which may be related to a single variable such as price in the case of a standardised requirement, or many variables in the case of capital equipment. Your negotiating strategies and tactics will all be focused on achieving overall objectives.

A monopoly exists when only one company can supply an essential product or service in a given region because of significant barriers to entry for any competitor. The barriers can be legal, regulatory, economic, or geographic. Ma Bell case is an example of monopoly. The company was broken up in 1982.

A monopsony is a market structure in which a single buyer substantially controls the market as the major purchaser of goods and services offered by many would-be sellers.

Pure or perfect competition is a theoretical market structure in which the following criteria are met:

- All firms sell an identical product (the product is a "commodity" or "homogeneous").

- All firms are price takers (they cannot influence the market price of their product).

- Market share has no influence on prices.

- Buyers have complete or "perfect" information—in the past, present and future—about the product being sold and the prices charged by each firm.

- Resources for such a labor are perfectly mobile.

- Firms can enter or exit the market without cost.

Monopolistic competition characterizes an industry in which many firms offer products or services that are similar, but not perfect substitutes. Barriers to entry and exit in a monopolistic competitive industry are low, and the decisions of any one firm do not directly affect those of its competitors. Monopolistic competition is closely related to the business strategy of brand differentiation

Fixed costs (FC) are costs that do not vary with volume. To an airline once aircraft are purchased, flight crews trained and departures scheduled, costs are disproportionately fixed.

Variable costs (VC) are those which vary with the amount produced. Fuel, catering services and marketing are examples of variable.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Currency exchange rates are determined by macroeconomic factors and demand and supply. In general, countries with stable political and economic systems, a growing economy and a strong rule of law will have stronger and more stable currency than those without these characteristics. In this question, the British Pound is stronger than other currency, which means that buyers who import goods from the UK have to pay higher in their own currencies.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Supplier bargaining power is stronger when there arefew suppliers,low volume requirementsfrom buyers, and when suppliers possessunique capabilities or technology(like specialized machinery). These conditions reduce buyer leverage and increase supplier influence.

An oligopoly exists when there are small number of producers that exert a significant influence in the market. Oligopoly's main characteristics are discussed as follows:

- Interdependence

The most important feature of oligopoly is the interdependence in decision¬-making of the few firms which comprise the industry. This is because when the number of competi¬tors is few, any change in price, output, product etc. by a firm will have a direct effect on the fortune of its rivals, which will then retaliate in changing their own prices, output or products as the case may be.

- Importance of advertising and selling costs

A direct effect of interdependence of oligopolists is that the various firms have to employ various aggressive and defensive marketing weapons to gain a greater share in the market or to prevent a fall in their market share. For this various firms have to incur a good deal of costs on advertising and on other measures of sales promotion. Therefore, there is a great importance of advertising and selling costs under conditions of market situation characterised by oligopoly

- Group behaviour

Another important feature of oligopoly is that for the proper solution to the problem of determination of price and output under, it analysis of group behaviour is impor-tant.

- Indeterminateness of demand curve facing an oligopolist

In this question, 'Prices in oligopoly are predicted to fluctuate widely and frequently' is an incorrect statement as producers in oligopoly often try to set up price. Prices fluctuate more frequently in perfect competition.

LO 2, AC 2.2

An adversarial negotiation style is appropriate when one party has high bargaining power and is focused on maximizing its benefit rather than maintaining a long-term relationship. This approach often involves competitive tactics that leverage power disparities, aligning with CIPS guidance on when adversarial tactics may be strategically used in negotiations.

According to Thomas-Kilmann conflict model instrument, there are 5 conflict management styles:

In this scenario, the buyer's bargaining power is stronger than suppliers', and the relationship is transactional. Therefore, to get the most preferable outcome, the procurement professional can take an assertive approach, while he doesn't need to co-operate closely with these suppliers. Competing will be the most appropriate approach to negotiation in this scenario so that the buying organisation can get a better deal.

As negotiations near closure, skilled negotiators carefully observe for buying signals—verbal cues (“That sounds reasonable…”) and non-verbal cues (nodding, smiling, leaning forward). These indicate readiness to agree and confirm whether it is the right time to close. At this stage, both sides usually stop gathering data or building rapport, as the focus is on confirming alignment and avoiding last-minute derailments. Closing too early may risk missing concessions, but delaying risks cooling momentum. Recognising buying signals ensures closure occurs at the optimal point, aligning with preparation and tactical awareness.

The agency (buyer) has made a concession about the price. Possibly the supplier will request another concession (the salami tactics). To avoid this to be happened, the agency should only allow a concession as an exception, make sure that the concession is documented and only permitted against some exceptional circumstances, and seek agreement to this from the supplier.

LO 3, AC 3.2

For low-value, routine purchases, the involvement of The procurement manager (C) and An internal business user (E) is appropriate. The procurement manager brings expertise in supplier engagement, while the internal business user provides insights on specific needs for the productor service. Involving high-level roles, like the CEO or a legal advisor, is unnecessary for routine purchases, as per CIPS guidance on resource alignment in procurement.

Below are some examples of cost input that can be analysed in PPCA process:

- Material costs

- Process and labour costs

- Employment costs

- Overhead costs

- Distribution costs

- Depreciation on equipment

- Profit

If you want to learn more on PPCA, you can study from OGC document here: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100609100650/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Cost_Price_analysis(1).pdf

LO 2, AC 2.1

In order to break vicious cycle of blame, procurement will need to use their negotiation and conflict management skills, adopting a collaborative and integrative approach. Your first action should be to establish the facts that led to the situation where the relationship broke down. Most day-to-day relationship between buying organisations and suppliers do not of course involve procurement staff, so you will need to consult with your business partners internally to establish their point of view of where the issue and sources of conflict are. You should also contact the supplier and get their side of the story - this is particularly to when you have previously identified the supplier as critical or otherwise important to your operations. Ideally you will be able to apply principled negotiation here, separating the people from the issue, focusing on interests and not positions, and then looking for options of mutual benefits.

Investors or shareholders who have high level of influence but low interest belong to 'Keep satisfied' quadrant of Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix.

You may read 2 versions from L4M1 and L4M5 here:

Table Description automatically generated

LO 1, AC 1.1

Integrative negotiationfocuses onmutual gainand long-term collaboration. It seeks tomaximize joint outcomesand encourages parties to align interests andpursue shared goals. This contrasts with distributive tactics that prioritize individual wins and short-term gains.

“Integrative negotiations aim to create outcomes where both parties benefit. Shared problem-solving, information exchange, and joint goal pursuit are central features of this approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Principles of Integrative Negotiation)

Internal stakeholder support will be important not just at the initial negotiation of the contract, but potentially throughout the life of the contract right through to exit.

As a general rule, connected stakeholders (with the exception of suppliers) have a low level of influence on procurement negotiations.

Suppliers are connected stakeholders who have contractual relationships with the organisation.

Commercial negotiation objective should be driven by the business needs of the organisation, and not just the instinct of procurement.

Variable costs fluctuate with production volume — e.g., raw materials and delivery costs. Fixed costs such as rent and insurance remain constant regardless of output. In negotiations, suppliers may inflate fixed cost allocations to justify pricing; buyers should differentiate between fixed and variable costs to challenge pricing more effectively. Recognising true variable costs also allows negotiating for volume-related discounts.

Distributive negotiation carries several risks beyond justlosing out on value. These includedamaging supplier relationships,eroding trust, andreaching an impasse, where neither party can agree. This could result in delayed projects, increased costs, or supplier withdrawal.

“Distributive negotiation can lead to a breakdown in communication, impasses, and long-term relationship damage. The win-lose mindset can prevent collaborative problem-solving.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.5 - Risks of Distributive Approaches)

Using logic involves applying numerical data and factual evidence to support arguments in a negotiation. Logical reasoning appeals to objective analysis rather than emotional or coercive tactics and is effective in convincing the other party through structured, fact-based arguments, aligning with CIPS's guidance on logical negotiation techniques.

Knowing supplier's fixed and variable costs is beneficial for the buyer in a negotiation. With these insights, the buyer would know the volume at which the supplier reaches break-even points and then offers significant discount due to economies of scale.

A collaborative relationship is characterized by mutual commitment, which enhances risk management and strategic planning between buyer and supplier. High levels of trust and commitment enable both parties to work closely to achieve shared objectives, creating a beneficial negotiation environment. This approach aligns with CIPS’s principles of collaborative procurement relationships.

Conflicts arise in procurement when risks, costs, or gains are not fairly shared, creating perceptions of exploitation. Another frequent source is late payment of supplier invoices, which damages trust and supplier cash flow. Scheduling or early involvement, by contrast, usually supports collaboration unless poorly managed. Conflict is natural in negotiations due to divergent interests, but recognising sources allows proactive management. Skilled negotiators use integrative approaches to turn potential conflict into opportunity, aligning incentives and ensuring fairness.

There are multiple sources of divergent positions that can arise in situations where money is exchange for goods and services. There are 2 different types of sources. Those that arise from the content or subject matter of the negotiation (what is being negotiated) and those that arise from the process of negotiation (how it is being negotiated).

Sources of divergent position - the content of negotiation:

Table Description automatically generated

Cultural differences are the source of conflict in the process of negotiation.

Requisition is an internal document raised by user or store to communicate to procurement the need to buy the product or service specified. This is merely a internal document.

Framework arrangement is a rather loose set-up, without any legal standing. It usually occurs when an organisation has decided for itself to limit the number of suppliers it is willing to work with and, through a purely internal process, sets up an approved list of such suppliers.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Jayden's use ofeye contact to demonstrate understandingis a core element ofactive and effective listening. This technique includes not only listening to spoken words but also using non-verbal cues (e.g., nodding, eye contact) to confirm comprehension and engagement. Effective listening is essential to ensure that both parties feel heard and respected, which can de-escalate tension and improve outcomes.

“Effective listening involves verbal and non-verbal behaviours that show attentiveness. Maintaining eye contact, nodding, and reflecting key points show engagement and help in building rapport and trust.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.3 - Communication Techniques in Negotiation)

Tradeables—alternative offers or concessions—are typically introduced during thebargainingstage of the negotiation. This is when both parties discuss and exchange proposals to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

Break-even analysis identifies the sales volume required to cover fixed costs. It relies on:

Fixed costs (constant regardless of output).

Open questions (“how/why/what…”) encourage the other party to share information, interests, and constraints, supporting rapport, listening, and exploration—key to persuasive dialogue and integrative outcomes. Closed questions check facts; open ones surface interests.

Non-verbal communicationsignificantly affects the dynamics of negotiation.Hand gestures,eye contact, andfacial expressionscan reinforce spoken words or contradict them. These elements can influence perception, trust, and the tone of the negotiation.

“Non-verbal communication includes gestures, posture, eye contact, and facial expressions. These play a critical role in how messages are received and interpreted.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.3 - Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication Techniques)

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Win-lose approach is useful when the relationship with the other party (TOP) is short-term and once-off.

The question mentions 4 types of relationship:

Adversarial: Both seek to maximize position at the expense of the other. Almost no trust, communication and cooperation. These suppliers will probably provide non-core products or services with the buyer purchasing them on a one-off basis.

Outsourcing relationship: Use competent suppliers to manage non-core businesses previously done in-house. Require high level of trust and collaboration

Partnership: Both work closely on long term development by sharing information, technology and ideas.High level of trust with the aim to benefit both parties (win-win)

Strategic alliance: Both parties identify areas where they could collaborate to create mutual benefits

Among these 4 types of relationship, only adversarial is once-off. Then it is the correct answer.

An adversarial relationship is characterized by a competitive, often zero-sum approach where:

Minimal sharing of information (A): In adversarial settings, there is limited transparency as each party prioritizes its interests.

Use of power to seek the best possible deal (D): Power dynamics are leveraged to gain favorable terms, often at the expense of the other party.

This style typically lacks collaboration and mutual commitment, focusing instead on short-term gains rather than building a partnership, as described in CIPS resources on adversarial relationships.

Direct costs are those costs of a product/service directly attributable/traceable to its production, for example, the costs of labour and materials directly used to produce the goods/services which the organisation sells.

There are multiple sources of divergent positions that can arise in situations where money is exchange for goods and services. There are 2 different types of sources. Those that arise from the content or subject matter of the negotiation (what is being negotiated) and those that arise from the process of negotiation (how it is being negotiated).

Sources of divergent positions - the process of negotiation:

Table Description automatically generated

Line of best fits is the line that goes approximately through the middle of the data points with an equal number of data points above and below it. Line of best fits is a method of calculating medium value in statistics.

Standard terms and conditions are basic terms and conditions of business governing transactions that do not have a definitive contract, usually designed to be included in form documents such as orders. While there may be conflicts regarding standard terms and conditions, they are about the content of negotiation, not the process.

Type of purchase: when buying organisation makes an decision to purchase an item, a buyer is faced with three possible scenarios. The item to be bought could be a straight re-buy, a modified re-buy or a new purchase. Decision on type of purchase is purely an internal decision.

Effective listening is crucial in integrative negotiations because it promotes understanding and collaboration. By actively listening, parties can identify shared interests and address concerns, which supports the goal of reaching mutually beneficial solutions. This is a key component in CIPS guidelines on successful integrative negotiation practices.

An adversarial negotiation style is more suitable in a market with many alternative sources and substitutes (B). When there are multiple suppliers, buyers have the upper hand and can adopt a competitive stance without risking supply continuity. This aligns with CIPS guidance on the use of adversarial styles in competitive markets with numerous alternatives.

Competitive bidding is generally recommended for high-value or complex purchases where the cost and time required for the bidding process are justified. For low-value, routine items like pens, the time and resources required for competitive bidding may outweigh the potential cost savings, as noted in CIPS best practices. Hence, Option C is the best answer.

In the scenario, the length of payment period is particularly important to the supplier as they are investing new facilities. Otherwise, the buyer's company has a positive cash flow position and budget is available for a shorter payment terms. So this tradeable (payment period) is important to supplier but it is not a significant problem with the buyer. This tradeable will fall within 'Easy concession to trade' quadrant in the following matrix:

Table Description automatically generated

If the tradeable fall within this quadrant, Sally should shorten the payment period in supplier's favour and try to win as many concessions as possible in return. Asking for a discount may be a reasonable trade-off.

LO 2, AC 2.3

There are nine commonly used influence tactic:

1. Rational persuasion includes using facts, data, and logical arguments to try to convince others that your point of view is the best alternative. This is the most commonly applied influence tactic.

2. Legitimating

3. Personal appeals

4. Exchange

5. Ingratiation

6. Pressure refers to exerting undue influence on someone to do what you want or else something undesirable will occur.

7. Coalitions refer to a group of individuals working together toward a common goal to influence others.

8. Inspirational appeals

9. Consultation refers to the influence agent’s asking others for help in directly influencing or planning to influence another person or group.

In the scenario, there is a problem with demand forecasting and supply chain planning in Leitax. The new Supply chain director invites the stakeholders to a meeting to find the solution. She is using coalition tactics.

Negotiations do not end at the meeting; they continue through reflection, documentation, and post-negotiation review. Best practice involves assessing whether objectives were met, capturing lessons learned, and ensuring written confirmation of terms. Without this, misunderstandings or missed improvements can occur. Reflection allows organisations to continuously strengthen negotiation strategies and build learning cycles.

In order to estimate the gap and the progress towards desired level of support, a stakeholder support scale can be used by the procurement internally. The support level scale measures stakeholder commitment. Current support level for the procurement/negotiation objectives should be gained from engagement with key stakeholders. The following is an example of stakeholder support level scale:

LO 1, AC 1.1