In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, thepartner determination profileis used to define how business partners, such as the ordering party, are determined for a freight order based on specific criteria, such as the consignee’s ID. According to the SAP documentation, the partner determination profile is customized for the freight order type to automatically assign partners (e.g., a forwarding house as the ordering party) based on predefined rules or conditions. This ensures that the correct forwarding house is selected based on the consignee’s ID.

The other options are incorrect:

Shipper/consignee determination (A)is not a standard configuration object in SAP TM; partner determination handles these roles.

Organizational unit determination condition (B)is used for determining organizational units, not business partners like the ordering party.

Creation strategy (D)relates to how freight orders are created (e.g., automatic or manual), not partner assignment.

In SAP Business Network for Logistics, dispute management allows carriers to interact with freight settlement documents to resolve discrepancies. According to the SAP documentation:

Upload files (A)is a supported activity, as carriers can upload documents (e.g., proof of delivery or additional evidence) to support their dispute claims.

Add a detention charge (B)is allowed, as carriers can add assessorial charges, such as detention charges, to address additional costs incurred during transportation.

The other options are incorrect:

Change the document currency (C)is not typically allowed in dispute management, as the currency is defined in the freight agreement or settlement document.

Change a charge line's calculation base (D)is managed by the shipper or system configuration, not by the carrier during dispute management.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, incompatibilities are used to enforce restrictions in various processes to prevent incompatible combinations. According to the SAP documentation, incompatibilities can be applied in:

Delivery proposal (A): Incompatibilities ensure that certain products or freight units are not combined in delivery proposals (e.g., due to hazardous material restrictions).

Freight unit building (D): Incompatibilities prevent specific products or requirements from being combined into the same freight unit (e.g., incompatible goods).

Carrier selection (E): Incompatibilities restrict certain carriers from being assigned to specific freight orders based on criteria like equipment or service capabilities.

The other options are incorrect:

Tendering (B)uses tendering profiles and rules but does not typically involve incompatibilities.

Charge calculation (C)relies on freight agreements and rate tables, not incompatibilities.