Get C_TS422_2023 Dumps : Verified SAP Certified Associate - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Production Planning and Manufacturing

In SAP S/4HANA, the Kanban process links supply and demand sources via thecontrol cycle(transaction PKMC). Required information includes:

Replenishment strategy(C): In the control cycle (PKMC, field: Replenishment Strategy), you define how replenishment occurs (e.g., "0001" for in-house production, "0003" for external procurement, "0002" for stock transfer). This strategy specifies the supply source (e.g., production, vendor) and how it meets demand at the Kanban bin.

Production supply area(D): The PSA (defined in Customizing, transaction PK05, and assigned in PKMC) represents the demand source—where the material is consumed (e.g., a specific production line). It connects the Kanban bin to the supply source (e.g., storage location or work center).

Routing(A) (CA21) details operations for production but isn’t directly maintained in the control cycle—it’s referenced via the production version.Work Center(B) (CR02) is linked indirectly via the PSA or production version, not a direct control cycle field. This is per SAP’s Kanban configuration.

To enable capacity availability checks for production orders in SAP S/4HANA, specific settings ensure the system evaluates work center capacity:

The Relevant for Finite Scheduling indicator must be set(A): In the work center (transaction CR02, Capacity tab, field: Relevant to Finite Scheduling), this indicator must be activated. It ensures the system considers capacity limits during scheduling and availability checks, treating the work center as finite rather than infinite.

An overall profile must be assigned in the checking control(D): In Customizing (Production > Shop Floor Control > Operations > Capacity Planning > Define Checking Control), the checking control links the order type and plant to an overall profile (e.g., SAPSFCG013). This profile (defined in Capacity Planning Customizing) specifies how capacity is checked(e.g., scope, tolerances) during order release or creation.

The scope of check(B) is part of the overall profile, not a separate setting in this context.A checking rule in work centers(C) applies to material availability or ATP checks, not capacity checks, which rely on the capacity profile and finite scheduling settings. This is detailed in SAP’s capacity planning documentation.

In SAP S/4HANA Advanced Planning (PP/DS),peggingis a key concept that links supply (receipts) to demand (issues) across the production structure. It is defined as:

An evaluation that is ordered according to the bill-of-material structure of all related products and represents the relationship between the receipt and the issue elements(A): Pegging (visible in /SAPAPO/RRP3 or Product View) assigns receipt elements (e.g.,planned orders, stock) to issue elements (e.g., sales orders, dependent requirements) based on the BOM hierarchy. It follows the BOM structure (top-down or bottom-up) to ensure each demand is covered by a specific supply, maintaining traceability and sequence (e.g., fixed or dynamic pegging).

Option B (overstock situations) relates to stock analysis, not pegging’s core purpose. Option C (network structure) is inaccurate—pegging uses BOM, not a network, and focuses on assignment, not just coverage. Option D (shortages) is a result of planning, not pegging’s definition, which is about linking, not identifying gaps. This aligns with SAP’s PP/DS pegging documentation.

In SAP S/4HANA, the goal is to plan in-house production of a semi-finished material using planned independent requirements (PIRs), with those PIRs consumed by dependent requirements from the finished good’s production:

Planning at assembly level (70)(D): Strategy 70 (material master, MRP 3 view, Strategy Group: 70) is designed for subassemblies or semi-finished materials. PIRs are entered for the semi-finished material (MD61), triggering in-house production (planned orders via MRP). When a sales order for the finished good is received, the dependent requirements (from BOM explosion) consume these PIRs within the consumption period (MRP 3 view), aligning production of the semi-finished material with higher-level demand.

Assembly processing with production orders (82)(A) is an MTO strategy tied to sales orders, not PIRs.Planning with final assembly (40)(B) applies to finished goods, where PIRs are consumed by sales orders, not dependent requirements of semi-finished items.Production by lot size (30)(C) focuses on lot-size-based production without consumption logic. Strategy 70 is explicitly designed for this scenario per SAP documentation.

In SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, theKanban processmanages material replenishment using control cycles (transaction PKMC). Supply sources are configured as follows:

Use run schedule quantities for in-house production(A): For in-house production, the Kanban control cycle (PKMC) can specify a production supply area and a production version (MRP 4 view). When a Kanban is set to "Empty," the system generatesrun schedule quantities(planned orders in repetitive manufacturing, confirmed via MFBF), replenishing stock from the production line.

Use stock transfer reservations for stock transfer(B): For stock transfer between storage locations, the control cycle defines a replenishment strategy (e.g., "0002" - Stock Transfer). When triggered, astock transfer reservation(visible in MB23) is created to move stock from a source storage location to the Kanban bin, managed via goods movement (e.g., MIGO).

Use purchase orders for external procurement(C): For external procurement, the control cycle links to a scheduling agreement or contract (ME31K). Setting a Kanban to "Empty" generates apurchase orderor schedule line (visible in ME38), triggering replenishment from the vendor.

Use quotations(D) isn’t a standard Kanban supply source—quotations (ME47) are pre-procurement documents, not direct replenishment triggers.Use purchasing costs for automated source prioritization(E) isn’t a Kanban feature—source selection is manual or via control cycle settings, not cost-based automation. This is per SAP’s Kanban setup documentation.