Practice Free CMMC-CCP Certified CMMC Professional (CCP) Exam Exam Questions Answers With Explanation

In the context of a Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 Assessment, specific practices must be evaluated to ensure compliance with established security requirements. One such practice is AC.L2-3.1.19, which mandates the encryption of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) on mobile devices and mobile computing platforms.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Requirement Overview:

Practice AC.L2-3.1.19 requires organizations to "Encrypt CUI on mobile devices and mobile computing platforms." This ensures that any CUI accessed, stored, or transmitted via mobile devices is protected through encryption, mitigating risks associated with data breaches or unauthorized access.

Assessment of Provided Evidence:

During the assessment, the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) provided an inventory list encompassing servers, workstations, and network devices. Notably, this list lacks any mention of mobile devices or mobile computing platforms.

Implications of the Omission:

The absence of mobile devices in the inventory suggests that the OSC may not have accounted for all assets that process, store, or transmit CUI. Without a comprehensive inventory that includes mobile devices, it's challenging to verify whether the OSC has implemented the necessary encryption measures for CUI on these platforms.

Assessment Determination:

Given the incomplete inventory, the evidence is insufficient to make a definitive scoring determination for practice AC.L2-3.1.19. The OSC must provide a detailed inventory that encompasses all relevant devices, including mobile devices and computing platforms, to demonstrate compliance with the encryption requirements for CUI.

Step 1: Understand the “CA” Domain – Security Assessment

TheCA (Security Assessment)domain includes practices related to:

Planning security assessments,

Performing periodic reviews,

Managing plans of action and milestones (POA&Ms).

These practices derive fromNIST SP 800-171, specifically:

CA.2.157– Develop, document, and periodically update security plans,

CA.2.158– Periodically assess security controls,

CA.2.159– Develop and implement POA&Ms.

?Step 2: Review CMMC Levels

Level 1 (Foundational):

Implements only the17 practicesfromFAR 52.204-21

Doesnot include the CA domain

Level 2 (Advanced):

Implements110 practicesfromNIST SP 800-171, including CA.2.157–159

First levelwhereSecurity Assessment (CA)practices are required

Level 3:

Not yet finalized but intended to include selected controls fromNIST SP 800-172

?Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Level 1

?No CA domain practices are present at Level 1.

C. Level 3 / D. Level 4

?These levels build on CA practices but do not represent thestarting point.

TheSecurity Assessment (CA)domain practices begin atCMMC Level 2, as part of the implementation ofNIST SP 800-171.

Step 1: Understanding CMMC Level 1 Self-Assessment Scope

CMMC Level 1applies toFederal Contract Information (FCI)systems.

Any system or device that is connected to an FCI-handling network is within the assessment scopebecause it canintroduce vulnerabilitiesinto the environment.

Step 2: Why the Thermostat is in Scope

TheWi-Fi-enabled thermostat is connected to the FCI network, meaning it haspotential accessto sensitive contract-related data.

PerCMMC Scoping Guidance, this type of device is classified as aRestricted Information System (Restricted IS)—devices that do not store, process, or transmit FCI but areconnected to networks that do.

Restricted IS must be accounted for in the self-assessment scope to ensure they do not compromise security controls.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and CMMC Code of Professional Conduct emphasize that conflicts of interest (COI) must be disclosed and managed transparently. A Certified CMMC Professional (CCP) is required to:

Inform their organization,

Disclose the COI to the affected stakeholders, and

Take reasonable steps to minimize the impact.

What they must NOT do is conceal it from the Assessment Team Lead or others. Concealing a COI violates the CMMC Code of Professional Conduct and compromises the integrity of the assessment.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP), v1.0

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct, CMMC-AB

Theprimary goal of CMMC assessment proceduresis to determine whether anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)complies with the cybersecurity controls required for its certification level. Themost common purpose of assessment procedures is to obtain evidencethat verifies an organization has properly implemented security practices.

Why "A. Obtain Evidence" is Correct?

CMMC Assessments Require Evidence Collection

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideoutlines that assessors must use three methods to verify compliance:

Examine– Reviewing documentation, policies, and system configurations.

Interview– Speaking with personnel to confirm understanding and execution.

Test– Validating controls through operational or technical tests.

All these methods involve obtaining evidenceto support whether a security requirement has been met.

Alignment with NIST SP 800-171A

CMMC Level 2 assessments follow NIST SP 800-171A, which is designed for evidence-based verification.

Assessors rely on documented artifacts, system logs, configurations, and personnel testimony as evidence of compliance.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect?

B. Define level of effort (Incorrect)

Thelevel of effortrefers to the time and resources needed for an assessment, but this is aplanningactivity, not the primary goal of an assessment.

C. Determine information flow (Incorrect)

While understandinginformation flowis important for security controls likedata protection and access control, themain purpose of an assessment is to gather evidence—not to determine information flow itself.

D. Determine value of hardware and software (Incorrect)

Asset valuation may be part of an organization’s risk management process, but CMMC assessmentsdo not focus on determining hardware or software value.

Conclusion

The correct answer isA. Obtain evidence, as theCMMC assessment process is evidence-drivento verify compliance with security controls.

Understanding Training Requirements in CMMC

The requirement for ensuring thatpersonnel are trained to carry out their assigned information security-related duties and responsibilitiesfirst appears inCMMC Level 2as part ofNIST SP 800-171 control AT.L2-3.2.1.

Key Details on the Training Requirement:

?AT.L2-3.2.1: "Ensure that personnel are trained to carry out their assigned information security-related duties and responsibilities."

?This control is derived fromNIST SP 800-171and applies toCMMC Level 2 (Advanced).

?It ensures that employees handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)understand theircybersecurity responsibilities.

Why is the Correct Answer "B. Level 2"?

A. Level 1 ? Incorrect

CMMC Level 1 does not include this training requirement.Level 1 focuses on basic safeguarding ofFederal Contract Information (FCI)but doesnot require formal cybersecurity training.

B. Level 2 ? Correct

The training requirement (AT.L2-3.2.1) first appears in CMMC Level 2, which aligns withNIST SP 800-171.

C. Level 3 ? Incorrect

The training requirementalready exists in Level 2. Level 3 builds on Level 2 with additionalrisk management and advanced cybersecurity controls, but training is introduced at Level 2.

D. All levels ? Incorrect

CMMC Level 1 does not include this requirement—it is first introduced in Level 2.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.2.1)

Defines themandatory training requirementfor personnel handling CUI.

CMMC Assessment Guide for Level 2

ListsAT.L2-3.2.1as a required practice under Level 2.

CMMC 2.0 Model Overview

Confirms thatCMMC Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171, which includes security training requirements.

In this scenario, the primary concern is the protection of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in an environment that lacks sufficient physical security controls (specifically, a lack of a locked cabinet or drawer). According to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and NIST SP 800-171 (specifically the Physical Protection (PE) family), CUI must be protected from unauthorized access at all times.

Responsibility of the Assessor: CMMC Professionals (CCPs and CCAs) are bound by the CMMC Code of Professional Conduct and the C3PAO's internal security protocols to ensure that any CUI provided by the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) is handled securely.

Physical Protection (PE.L2-3.10.1 and PE.L2-3.10.2): These practices require that an organization limit physical access to systems and equipment to authorized users and protect the physical facility. If the provided "hoteling space" does not offer a locked container (like a cabinet) to secure the CUI overnight, leaving it in an unlocked drawer (Option C) or on the desk (Option B) would be a violation of CUI handling requirements and a security risk.

Why Option A is the best "Next" step: In the absence of on-site secure storage, the assessor must maintain positive control of the CUI. Taking the document to a secure location (such as the assessor's hotel room or person) where they can ensure it remains under their control is the only viable way to prevent unauthorized access by janitorial staff or other unauthorized personnel at the client site overnight.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option B and C: Both fail to protect the CUI from unauthorized access in a non-secure, shared environment.

Option D: Taking a picture of CUI on a personal phone is a major security violation (spillage), as personal devices are generally not authorized to store or process CUI.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0: Section regarding "Assessor Responsibilities for CUI and Proprietary Information."

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2: Physical Protection (PE) family (3.10.1, 3.10.2).

DoD Instruction 5200.48: "Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)," which specifies that CUI must be protected by at least one physical barrier when not in the direct control of an authorized individual.

The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Assessment Process (CAP) outlines strict guidelines regarding conflicts of interest (COI) to ensure the integrity and impartiality of assessments conducted by Certified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs) and Certified Assessors (CAs).

The scenario presented involves a potential conflict of interest due to a prior relationship (former college roommate) between the certified assessor and an individual at the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC). While this prior relationship does not automatically disqualify the assessor, it must be disclosed, documented, and mitigated appropriately.

CMMC Conflict of Interest Handling Process

Inform the OSC and C3PAO of the Potential Conflict of Interest

The CMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC) requires assessors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

Transparency ensures that all parties, including the OSC and C3PAO, are aware of the situation.

Document the Conflict and Mitigation Actions in the Assessment Plan

Per CMMC CAP documentation, potential conflicts should be assessed based on their material impact on the objectivity of the assessment.

The conflict and proposed mitigation strategies must be formally recorded in the assessment plan to provide an audit trail.

Determine If the Mitigation Actions Are Acceptable

If the OSC and C3PAO determine that the mitigation actions adequately eliminate or reduce the risk of bias, the assessment may proceed.

Common mitigation strategies include:

Assigning another assessor for interviews with the conflicted individual.

Ensuring that decisions regarding the OSC’s compliance are reviewed independently.

Proceed with the Assessment If Mitigation Is Acceptable

If the mitigation actions sufficiently address the conflict, the assessment may continue under strict adherence to documented procedures.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

A. Do not inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and continue as planned.

?Incorrect. This violates CMMC’s integrity requirements and could result in disciplinary actions against the assessor or invalidation of the assessment. Transparency is mandatory.

B. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and start the entire process over without the conflicted team member.

?Incorrect. The CAP does not mandate immediate reassignment unless the conflict is unresolvable. Instead, mitigation strategies should be considered first.

C. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest but since it has been an acceptable amount of time since college, no conflict of interest exists, and continue as planned.

?Incorrect. The passage of time alone does not automatically eliminate a conflict of interest. Proper documentation and mitigation are still required.

CMMC Official References

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document – Defines COI requirements and mitigation actions.

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC) – Outlines ethical responsibilities of assessors.

CMMC Accreditation Body (Cyber-AB) Guidance – Provides rules on conflict resolution.

Thus, option D is the most correct choice, as it aligns with the official CMMC conflict of interest procedures.

The CMMC Assessment Process uses three methods: Examine, Interview, and Test. The method that involves analyzing artifacts (documents, system configurations, records, logs, etc.) is Examine.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Assessment Guide: “Examine consists of reviewing, inspecting, or analyzing assessment objects such as documents, system configurations, or other artifacts to evaluate compliance.”

Why Option B is Correct:

Examine = analyzing artifacts.

Interview = discussions with personnel.

Test = executing technical checks.

Behavior is not an assessment method.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Assessment Guide, Levels 1 and 2 — Assessment Methods (Examine, Interview, Test).

===========

According to the CMMC Scoping Guidance, Level 1, the categorization of assets is much simpler than at Level 2. At Level 1, there are only two primary categories for assets within the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC): In-Scope Assets (FCI Assets) and Out-of-Scope Assets.

FCI Asset Definition: An asset is considered "In-Scope" for Level 1 if it processes, stores, or transmits Federal Contract Information (FCI). Since the company is building specialized parts under a DoD contract and using in-house staff and equipment for testing, the information related to that contract (the specifications, schedules, and test results) constitutes FCI.

The Level 1 Universe:

Level 1 does not use the complex sub-categories found in Level 2 scoping, such as "Specialized Assets" (OT/IoT/Test Equipment) or "Contractor Risk Managed Assets." Those distinctions are specific to CMMC Level 2 Scoping.

In a Level 1 environment, any piece of equipment or software that handles the contract's information is simply termed an FCI Asset, which falls under the broader umbrella of In-Scope Assets.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A (CUI Asset): Level 1 is focused exclusively on FCI. CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) is the focus of Level 2 and Level 3.

Option C (Specialized Asset) and Option D (Contractor Risk Managed Asset): These are specific scoping categories defined in the CMMC Level 2 Scoping Guidance. In Level 1, these categories do not exist; an asset either handles FCI (In-Scope) or it does not (Out-of-Scope).

Reference Documents:

CMMC Scoping Guidance, Level 1 (Version 2.0): Section 2.0 (CMMC Level 1 Asset Categories), which defines FCI Assets and Out-of-Scope Assets.

32 CFR Part 170 (CMMC Program Rule): Establishes the simplified scoping requirements for Level 1 self-assessments.

CMMC Level 1 Assessment Guide: Clarifies that the scope includes all "information systems" (including test equipment) used by the contractor to process, store, or transmit FCI.

Understanding CMMC 2.0 Levels and Their Descriptions

TheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0consists ofthree levels, each representing increasing cybersecurity maturity:

Level 1 – Foundational

Focuses onbasic cyber hygiene

Implements17 practicesaligned withFAR 52.204-21

Primarily protectsFederal Contract Information (FCI)

Level 2 – Advanced(Correct Answer)

Focuses onprotecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Implements110 practicesaligned withNIST SP 800-171

Requirestriennial third-party assessments for critical programs

Level 3 – Expert

Focuses onadvanced cybersecurityagainstAPT (Advanced Persistent Threats)

ImplementsNIST SP 800-171 and additional NIST SP 800-172 controls

Requirestriennial government-led assessments

Why "B. Advanced" is Correct?

TheCMMC 2.0 framework explicitly describes Level 2 as "Advanced."

Italigns with NIST SP 800-171to ensure robustCUI protection.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect?

A. Expert (Incorrect)– This describesLevel 3, not Level 2.

C. Optimizing (Incorrect)– Not a defined CMMC level description.

D. Continuously Improved (Incorrect)– CMMC does not use this terminology.

Conclusion

The correct answer isB. Advanced, which accurately describesCMMC Level 2.

Understanding CMMC Assessment Procedures

ACMMC assessment procedureconsists of:

Assessment Objective– Defines what is being evaluated and the expected outcome.

Assessment Methods– Specifies how the evaluation is conducted (e.g.,examination, interviews, testing).

Assessment Objects– Identifies what is being evaluated, such as policies, systems, or people.

Why the Correct Answer is "C"?

Assessment Objectivesincludedetermination statementsthat describe the expected outcome for each CMMC security practice.

These statements define whether a practice has beenadequately implementedbased ondocumented evidence and assessment findings.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) GuideandNIST SP 800-171Aspecify that each practice has a determination statement guiding assessment decisions.

Why Not the Other Options?

A. Specifications and mechanisms?Incorrect

These belong toassessment objects, which refer to the systems, policies, and mechanisms being evaluated.

B. Examination, interviews, and testing?Incorrect

These areassessment methods, which describe how assessorsverifycompliance (e.g., through interviews or testing).

D. Exercising assessment objects under specified conditions?Incorrect

This refers toassessment testing, which is a method, not an assessment objective.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– Describes determination statements as the core of assessment objectives.

NIST SP 800-171A– Defines determination statements as a key element of evaluating security controls.

Final Justification:

Since anassessment objectiveincludes adetermination statementthat describes whether a practice is implemented properly, the correct answer isC.

Understanding the C3PAO Assessment Methodology

ACertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)is an entity authorized by theCMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB)to conduct officialCMMC Level 2 assessmentsfor organizations seeking certification.

Key Requirement: CMMC Assessment Process (CAP)

C3PAOs must follow theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP), which outlines:

?Theassessment methodologyfor evaluating compliance.

?Evidence collectionprocedures (interviews, artifacts, testing).

?Assessment scoring and reportingrequirements.

?Guidance for assessorson executing standardized assessments.

Why "CMMC Assessment Process" is Correct?

ISO 27001 (Option A)is an international standard forinformation security managementbut isnot the basis for CMMC assessments.

NIST SP 800-53A (Option B)providessecurity control assessments for federal systems, but CMMC assessments arebased on NIST SP 800-171.

GAO Yellow Book (Option D)is agovernment auditing standardused forfinancial and performance audits, not cybersecurity assessments.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) (Option C) is the correct answerbecause it defines how C3PAOs conduct CMMC assessments.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 Documentation

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– GovernsC3PAO assessment execution.

CMMC 2.0 Model Documentation– RequiresC3PAOs to follow CAP proceduresfor assessments.

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isC. CMMC Assessment Process, as it is theofficial methodology all C3PAOs must follow when conducting CMMC assessments.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) serves as the authoritative body overseeing the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) program within the United States federal government. NARA maintains the CUI Registry, which is the definitive resource for all categories, subcategories, and associated markings of CUI. This registry provides comprehensive guidance on the identification and handling of CUI, ensuring standardized practices across federal agencies and their contractors.

The other options are delineated as follows:

CMMC-AB:The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Accreditation Body is responsible for overseeing the CMMC program but does not manage CUI classifications.

DoD Contractors FAQ:While it may offer guidance to Department of Defense contractors, it is not an authoritative source for CUI data classifications.

OSC's privacy policies:An Organization Seeking Certification's internal policies pertain to its own data handling practices and are not authoritative for CUI classifications.

Therefore, for authoritative information on CUI data classifications, the NARA's CUI Registry is the appropriate resource.

In the context of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0, the remediation review process is a critical phase where identified deficiencies from an initial assessment are addressed. The Lead Assessor, representing a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO), plays a pivotal role in this process.

Role of the Lead Assessor in Remediation Reviews:

Validation of Remediation Efforts:

Objective: Ensure that the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) has effectively addressed and corrected all deficiencies identified during the initial assessment.

Process: The Lead Assessor reviews the evidence provided by the OSC to confirm that each previously unmet practice now meets the required standards. This involves examining updated policies, procedures, system configurations, and other relevant artifacts.

Delta Assessment Remediation Package Submission:

Definition: A delta assessment focuses on evaluating only the components or practices that were previously found non-compliant or deficient.

Responsibility: After validating the remediation efforts, the Lead Assessor compiles a remediation package that includes:

Detailed documentation of the deficiencies identified in the initial assessment.

Evidence of the corrective actions taken by the OSC.

Findings from the reassessment of the remediated practices.

Internal Quality Review: This remediation package is then submitted for the C3PAO's internal quality review process. The purpose of this review is to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of the assessment findings before finalizing the certification decision.

Rationale for Selecting Answer C:

Alignment with CMMC Assessment Process: The submission of a delta assessment remediation package for internal quality review is a standard procedure outlined in the CMMC Assessment Process. This step ensures that all remediated items are thoroughly evaluated and validated, maintaining the integrity of the certification process.

Clarification of Incorrect Options:

Option A: "Help OSC to complete planned remediation activities."

The Lead Assessor's role is to assess and validate the OSC's compliance, not to assist in the implementation or completion of remediation activities. Providing such assistance could lead to a conflict of interest and compromise the objectivity of the assessment.

Option B: "Plan two consecutive remediation reviews for an OSC."

The standard process involves conducting a single remediation review after the OSC has addressed the identified deficiencies. Planning multiple consecutive remediation reviews is not a typical practice and could indicate a lack of proper remediation planning by the OSC.

Option D: "Validate that practices previously listed on the POA&M have been removed on an updated Risk Assessment."

While it's essential to ensure that deficiencies are addressed, the primary focus of the Lead Assessor during a remediation review is to validate the implementation of remediated practices. Updating the Risk Assessment is the responsibility of the OSC's internal risk management team, not the Lead Assessor.

CMMC Level 2 Readiness and Certification Requirements

CMMCLevel 2is required forOrganizations Seeking Certification (OSCs) that handle Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)and aligns withNIST SP 800-171's 110 security controls.

Key Readiness Indicators for a Level 2 Assessment:

The OSC must have implemented all 110 security practices from NIST SP 800-171.

Documented and validated cybersecurity policies and procedures must exist.

The OSC must be prepared to provide objective evidence (artifacts) proving compliance.

Why the OSC in the Question is Not Ready:

They have not won a DoD contract yet? This means they do not yet have a contractually definedCUI environment, which is the foundation for defining their security scope.

They have only provided FCI-related artifacts(e.g., visitor logs, workstation policies, FedRAMP configurations).

Lack of full documentation of CMMC Level 2 controls? The assessment requiresevidence for all 110 security practices(e.g., system security plans, incident response records, security awareness training documentation).

Clarification of Incorrect Options:

A. "Ready because there is no need to certify this company until after they win a DoD contract."

Incorrect? Some organizationsseek certification proactivelybefore winning contracts. However, readiness depends on implementingall 110 required controls, not contract status alone.

B. "Not ready because the OSC is not on contract because they do not know the scope of FCI protection required by the contract."

Incorrect? CMMC Level 2focuses on CUI, not just FCI. While FCI protection is important, the assessment’s focus is onCUI security requirements, which arenot fully addressed by the provided artifacts.

D. "Ready because all DoD contractors are required to achieve CMMC Level 2; therefore, they are being proactive in seeking certification."

Incorrect? While it is commendable that the OSC is being proactive,readiness is based on full compliance with NIST SP 800-171, not just intent.

In CMMC scoping terminology, an HQ Organization is the entity legally responsible for contract performance and delivery of products or services.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Scoping Guide: “HQ Organization is the legal entity responsible for the performance and delivery of contract requirements.”

Why Option D is Correct:

The HQ Org is legally accountable, while Host Units (option A/B) are subordinate entities.

Option C refers to shared services, not the HQ.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Scoping Guide, High-Level Scoping Definitions.

===========

Understanding Evidence Sufficiency in CMMC Level 2 Assessments

During aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theLead Assessormust determine whether the evidence collected for each practice issufficientto support an assessment finding. This aligns with theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, which requires assessors to evaluate:

Examinations– Reviewing documents, configurations, and system records.

Interviews– Speaking with personnel to confirm implementation and understanding.

Testing– Observing security controls in action to validate effectiveness.

To determine whether evidence issufficient, the assessor ensures that it:

Directly supports the assessment objective.

Demonstrates that the practice is consistently implemented.

Can be independently verified.

Why Option B (Sufficiency) is Correct

Sufficiencyrefers to whetherenoughevidence has been collected to make an accurate determination about compliance.

Option A (Adequacy)is incorrect because adequacy relates tothe qualityof evidence, while sufficiency focuses on whetherenoughevidence exists.

Option C (Process Mapping)is incorrect because process mapping is used for understanding workflows but is not an assessment verification method.

Option D (Assessment Scope)is incorrect because defining the scope happensbeforeevidence collection, during the planning phase.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Section 3.6 (Determining Sufficiency of Evidence)

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide – Evidence Collection and Evaluation

Final Verification

Since theLead Assessor is ensuring enough evidence is available to verify compliance, the correct answer isOption B: Sufficiency.

ThePhysical Protection (PE) domaininCMMC 2.0 Level 1includes the requirementPE.L1-3.10.3, which mandates that organizationsescort visitors and monitor their activity.

Breaking Down the Scenario:

TheCMMC Assessment Teamarrives at the OSC.

Thereceptionist acknowledges their arrival but does not verify credentials or escort themto the appropriate location.

Failing to verify visitor identity and failing to escort them is a violation of PE.L1-3.10.3.

Analysis of the Given Options:

A. PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity??Correct

This requirement ensures that visitorsdo not have unsupervised access to sensitive areas.

The receptionistshould have checked credentials and escorted the assessment team.

B. PE.L1-3.10.5: Control and manage physical access devices??Incorrect

This requirement refers to managingkeys, access badges, and security devices, which isnot the issue in this scenario.

C. PS.L2-3.9.1: Screen individuals prior to authorizing access to organizational systems containing CUI??Incorrect

This control applies to personnel screeningsbefore granting access to CUI systems, not physical visitor access.

D. PS.L2-3.9.2: Ensure that organizational systems containing CUI are protected during and after personnel actions such as terminations and transfers??Incorrect

This requirement deals withoffboarding employees and ensuring they no longer have system access. It isnot relevant to visitor escorting.

Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 - PE.L1-3.10.3 (Physical Protection)

Requires organizations toescort visitors and monitor visitor activityat facilities containingFCI or CUI.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, Control 3.10.3

States thatvisitors must be escorted and monitored at all timesto prevent unauthorized access.

Conclusion:

Since the receptionist failed to verify credentials and escort the visitors, this violatesPE.L1-3.10.3.

?Correct Answer: A. PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity

For a practice to beadequately implementedin aCMMC Level 2 assessment, theresponsible personnel must demonstrate knowledge of deployment, maintenance, and operationof security tools such asantivirus programs. Simply having the tool in place isnot sufficient—there must be evidence that it isproperly configured, updated, and monitoredto protect against threats.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

?1. Relevant CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 Requirements

CMMC Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171, which includes:

Requirement 3.14.5 (System and Information Integrity - SI-3):

"Employautomatedmechanisms toidentify, report, and correctsystem flaws in a timely manner."

Requirement 3.14.6 (SI-3(2)):

"Employautomated toolsto detect and prevent malware execution."

These requirements imply that theperson responsible for antivirus must understand how it is deployed and maintainedto ensure compliance.

?2. Why the Team Member’s Knowledge is Insufficient

Antivirus tools requireregular updates,configuration adjustments, andmonitoringto function properly.

The responsible team member must:

Knowhow the antivirus was deployedacross systems.

Be able toconfirm updates, logs, and alerts are monitored.

Understand how torespond to malware detectionsand failures.

If the team member lacks this knowledge, assessors maydetermine the practice is not fully implemented.

?3. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Yes, the antivirus program is available, so it is sufficient.?

Incorrect:Just having antivirus softwareinstalleddoes not prove compliance. It must bemanaged and maintained.

(B) Yes, antivirus programs are automated to run independently.?

Incorrect:While automation helps, security toolsrequire oversight, updates, and configuration.

(D) No, the team member's interview answers about deployment and maintenance are insufficient.?

Partially correct but incomplete:Themain issueis that the team membermust have sufficient knowledge, not just that their answers are weak.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

TheCMMC Assessment Guide for SI-3 and SI-3(2)states that personnel mustunderstand the function, deployment, and maintenance of security toolsto ensure proper implementation.

Thus, the correct answer is:

Understanding SI.L1-3.14.2: Provide Protection from Malicious Code

The CMMC Level 1 practiceSI.L1-3.14.2is based onNIST SP 800-171 Requirement 3.14.2, which requires organizations to:

Implement malicious code protection(e.g., antivirus, endpoint security software).

Ensure coverage across all appropriate locations(e.g., workstations, servers, network entry points).

Keep protection mechanisms updated(e.g., regular signature updates, policy enforcement).

Assessment Criteria for a "MET" Rating:

To determine whether the practice isMET, the Lead Assessor must confirm that:

?Antivirus or endpoint protection software is installedon all workstations and servers.

?The solution is centrally managed, ensuring consistent policy enforcement.

?Signature updates are current, meaning systems are protected against new threats.

?Logs or reports demonstrate active monitoring and updates.

Why is the Correct Answer "A. It is sufficient, and the audit finding can be rated as MET"?

The provided evidenceconfirms all necessary requirementsfor SI.L1-3.14.2:

?All workstations and servers have antivirus installed?Meets installation requirement.

?A centralized management console is in place?Ensures consistent enforcement.

?Records show antivirus signatures are up to date?Confirms system protection is current.

Because the evidencemeets the requirement, the practice should berated as MET.

Why Are the Other Answers Incorrect?

B. It is insufficient, and the audit finding can be rated NOT MET ? Incorrect

The evidence providedmeets all necessary requirements, so the practiceshould not be rated as NOT MET.

C. It is sufficient, and the Lead Assessor should seek more evidence ? Incorrect

Ifadequate evidence already exists,additional evidence is unnecessary.

D. It is insufficient, and the Lead Assessor should seek more evidence ? Incorrect

The evidence providedmeets the control requirements, making itsufficient.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies that a practice can be marked asMET if sufficient evidence is provided.

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.14.2)

Defines the standard formalicious code protection, which ismet by antivirus with active updates.

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 (Foundational) Requirements

Clarifies that basic cybersecurity measures likeantivirus installation and updatesmeet compliance forSI.L1-3.14.2.

Final Answer:

?A. It is sufficient, and the audit finding can be rated as MET.

Understanding FAR Clause 52.204-21

TheFederal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.204-21is titled"Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems."This clause establishesminimum cybersecurity requirementsforfederal contractorsthat handleFederal Contract Information (FCI).

Key Purpose of FAR Clause 52.204-21

Theprimary objectiveof FAR 52.204-21 is to ensure that contractors applybasic cybersecurity protectionsto theirinformation systemsthat process, store, or transmitFCI. Theseminimum safeguarding requirementsserve as abaseline security standardfor contractors doing business with theU.S. government.

Why "Minimum Standard of Care" is Correct?

FAR 52.204-21 doesnotrequire contractors to install specific cybersecurity tools (eliminating option A).

Itoutlines only the minimum safeguards, notallcybersecurity controls needed for complete security (eliminating option B).

CMMC certification isnotmandated by this clause alone (eliminating option D).

Instead, it establishesa baseline "standard of care"that all federal contractorsmust followto protectFCI(making option C correct).

Breakdown of Answer Choices

Option

Description

Correct?

A. It directs all covered contractors to install the cybersecurity systems listed in that clause.

?Incorrect–The clause doesnotspecify tools or require specific cybersecurity systems.

B. It describes all of the safeguards that contractors must take to secure covered contractor IS.

?Incorrect–It only setsminimumrequirements, notall possiblesecurity measures.

C. It describes the minimum standard of care that contractors must take to secure covered contractor IS.

?Correct – The clause defines basic safeguards as a minimum security standard.

D. It directs covered contractors to obtain CMMC Certification at the level equal to the lowest requirement of their contracts.

?Incorrect–FAR 52.204-21 doesnot mandateCMMC certification; that requirement comes from DFARS 252.204-7012 and 7021.

Minimum Safeguarding Requirements Under FAR 52.204-21

The clause defines15 basic security controls, which align withCMMC Level 1. Some examples include:

?Access Control– Limit access to authorized users.

?Identification & Authentication– Authenticate system users.

?Media Protection– Sanitize media before disposal.

?System & Communications Protection– Monitor and control network connections.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 and FAR Documentation

FAR 52.204-21– Establishes thebasic safeguarding requirementsfor FCI.

CMMC 2.0 Level 1– Directly aligns withFAR 52.204-21 controls.

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isC. It describes the minimum standard of care that contractors must take to secure covered contractor IS.This aligns withFAR 52.204-21 requirementsas abaseline security standard for FCI.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 is directly aligned withNIST Special Publication (SP) 800-171, "Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations."Organizations seeking certification (OSC) at Level 2 must demonstrate compliance with the 110 security requirements specified inNIST SP 800-171, as mandated byDFARS 252.204-7012.

Why NIST SP 800-171 is Essential for Level 2 Scoping:

Defines the Security Requirements for Protecting CUI:

NIST SP 800-171 outlines 110 security controls that contractors must implement to protectControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)in nonfederal systems.

These controls are categorized under14 families, including access control, incident response, and risk management.

Establishes the Baseline for CMMC Level 2 Compliance:

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 assessments areentirely based on NIST SP 800-171requirements.

Every practice assessed in a Level 2 certification maps directly to a requirement fromNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2.

Provides Guidance for Implementation & Assessment:

TheNIST SP 800-171A "Assessment Guide"provides detailed assessment objectives that guide OSCs in preparing for CMMC evaluations.

It helps define the scope of an assessment by clarifying how each control should be implemented and verified.

Referenced in CMMC and DFARS Regulations:

DFARS 252.204-7012requires contractors to implementNIST SP 800-171security requirements.

TheCMMC 2.0 Level 2modeldirectly incorporates all 110 requirementsfromNIST SP 800-171, ensuring consistency with DoD cybersecurity expectations.

Explanation of Incorrect Answers:

A. NIST SP 800-53 ("Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations")

This documentapplies to federal systems, not nonfederal entities handling CUI.

While it is the foundation for other security standards, it isnot the basis of CMMC Level 2assessments.

B. NIST SP 800-88 ("Guidelines for Media Sanitization")

This documentfocuses on secure data destructionand media sanitization techniques.

While data disposal is important, this standarddoes not define security controls for protecting CUI.

D. NIST SP 800-172 ("Enhanced Security Requirements for Protecting CUI")

This documentbuilds on NIST SP 800-171and applies to systems needingadvanced cybersecurity protections(e.g., targeting Advanced Persistent Threats).

It isnot required for standard CMMC Level 2 assessments, which only mandateNIST SP 800-171 compliance.

Key References for CMMC Level 2 Scoping:

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2(NIST Official Site)

NIST SP 800-171A (Assessment Guide)(NIST Official Site)

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Scoping Guide(Cyber AB)

Conclusion:

SinceCMMC 2.0 Level 2 assessments are based entirely on NIST SP 800-171, this document is the most relevant resource for scoping Level 2 assessments. Therefore, the correct answer is:

?C. NIST SP 800-171

Per the CMMC Scoping Guidance, External Service Providers (ESPs) must be included in scope if they process, store, or transmit CUI or FCI on behalf of the OSC. However, ESPs do not themselves receive a separate CMMC certification unless they undergo their own assessment or an enterprise-level certification is conducted. Their environment is assessed only as part of the OSC’s scope.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Scoping Guidance for Level 2

CMMC Model v2.0 Overview

The False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733) imposes liability on companies that knowingly misrepresent compliance in order to receive or retain federal contracts. Penalties include treble damages (three times the government’s losses) plus additional penalties per claim.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

False Claims Act: “Any person who knowingly submits false claims to the Government is liable for three times the Government’s damages plus a penalty.”

DOJ Cyber-Fraud Initiative (2021): confirms the FCA is applied to cases of misrepresenting compliance with cybersecurity requirements.

Why Option D is Correct:

The applicable law is the False Claims Act, not a “Cyber Claims Act” (which does not exist).

The FCA specifies treble damages plus penalties, which exactly matches Option D.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Governance and Source Documents):

False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733).

DOJ Cyber-Fraud Initiative (2021), applied to CMMC-related compliance misrepresentation.

===========

Per the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP), the Assessment Team is responsible for determining the adequacy and sufficiency of evidence collected during the assessment. The team validates whether practices and components for each in-scope Host Unit, Supporting Organization, or enclave meet the target CMMC level. The OSC (Organization Seeking Certification) provides evidence, but only the Assessment Team makes the verification and scoring determination.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP), v1.0

In the context of a CMMC Level 2 Assessment, assessors must evaluate the "Institutionalization" of practices, which includes the review of Policies. The validity of a policy document depends on the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC)'s internal governance and administrative procedures.

Internal Governance (The "Why"): CMMC does not dictate exactlyhowa company must authorize its policies (e.g., whether a signature must be refreshed immediately upon a personnel change). Instead, the assessor must verify if the document is considered "active" and "authoritative" by the OSC’s own standards.

The Role of the Assessor: As per the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and CCP training materials, an assessor cannot unilaterally declare a policy invalid simply because a signatory has left. The assessor must perform "more research" (typically through Interviews or examining Supplemental Documents) to determine the OSC's internal rules for policy management.

If the OSC's "Policy on Policies" states that a signature is tied to the individual, the document may be expired.

If the OSC's rules state that the authority is tied to the role/position (which is common in most corporate governance), the policy remains in effect until it is formally rescinded or updated.

Distinction from other options:

Option A is too restrictive; it assumes a universal rule that doesn't exist in the CMMC framework.

Option C is incorrect because a signatory (or formal approval)isoften what gives a policy its "authoritative" status in an audit; ignoring it would be a failure of the Examine method.

Option D is a common business assumption, but an assessor must verify this via the OSC's own procedures rather than assuming it is true for every company.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0: Section on "Examine" methods and evaluating evidence integrity.

NIST SP 800-171A: Discussion on "Organizational Policies" as assessment objects and the requirement for policies to be "established and maintained."

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide: Clarifies that policies must be "formally documented" and "representative of organizational requirements."

In theCMMC 2.0 Assessment Process, after theAssessment Final Recommended Findings Brief, theLead Assessor and Assessment Team Membersmustreview the accuracy and validity of the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC)’s updated Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) and any accompanying evidence or scheduled collectionswithin180 days.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 Reference:

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)outlines that organizations haveup to 180 daysto address identifieddeficienciesafter their initial assessment.

During this time, the OSC can update itsPOA&M with additional evidenceto demonstrate compliance.

Why is the Correct Answer 180 Days (B)?

A. 90 days ? Incorrect

The CMMC CAP does not impose a90-day limiton POA&M updates; instead,180 daysis the standard timeframe.

B. 180 days ? Correct

PerCMMC Assessment Process guidelines, theLead Assessor and Teammust review updateswithin 180 days.

C. 270 days ? Incorrect

No official CMMC documentation mentions a270-dayreview period.

D. 360 days ? Incorrect

The process must be completedfar sooner than 360 daysto maintain compliance.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Defines the180-day windowfor the OSC to update itsPOA&M and submit evidencefor review.

CMMC 2.0 Official Guidelines

Specifies that organizations are givenup to 180 daysto remediate deficiencies before reassessment.

1. Understanding CMMC 2.0 Levels and CUI Handling Requirements

UnderCMMC 2.0, contractors handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)must meet aminimumcertification level to be eligible for contract awards involving CUI.

CMMC 2.0 Levels:

Level 1 (Foundational) – 17 Practices

Covers onlyFederal Contract Information (FCI)security.

Does NOT meet CUI handling requirements.

Level 2 (Advanced) – 110 Practices?

REQUIRED for handling CUI.

Aligns withNIST SP 800-171, which establishes security controls for protecting CUI.

Contractorsmust achieve Level 2for contracts requiring CUI protection.

Level 3 (Expert) – 110+ Practices

Required for contracts involvinghigh-value CUIandcritical national security information.

Includesadditionalprotections fromNIST SP 800-172.

2. Official CMMC 2.0 References Confirming Level 2 for CUI

TheCMMC 2.0 Model Overviewclearly states that Level 2 is required for contractorshandling CUI.

DFARS 252.204-7012mandates that contractors protecting CUI must implementNIST SP 800-171, which is thefoundation of CMMC Level 2.

TheDoD’s CMMC Assessment Guidefor Level 2 specifies thatorganizations handling CUI must demonstrate full implementation of 110 practices from NIST SP 800-171to qualify for contract awards.

3. Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Level 1?

Only covers FCI, not CUI.

Does notmeet DoD requirements for protectingCUI.

C. Level 3?

While Level 3 offersadditional protectionsfor high-risk CUI, it isnot the minimumrequirement.

Level 2 is the minimumneeded to handle CUI.

D. Any level?

OnlyLevel 2 and higherare eligible for contracts requiring CUI protection.

Level 1 doesnotmeet CUI security standards.

Understanding the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Phases

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)consists ofthree primary phases:

Phase 1 - Planning(Pre-assessment activities)

Phase 2 - Conducting the Assessment(Evidence collection and analysis)

Phase 3 - Reporting and Finalizing Results

DuringPhase 3, the Assessment Teamreviews evidenceto confirm if anyLimited Practice Deficiency Correctionshave been successfully implemented.

Scoring Practices in Phase 3

The CAP document specifies that a practice can bescored as METif:

?The deficiency identified in Phase 2 has been fully corrected before final scoring.

?Sufficient evidence is provided to demonstrate compliance with the CMMC requirement.

?The correction is notmerely plannedbutfully implemented and validatedby the assessors.

Since the evidence shows thatdeficiencies have been corrected, the correct score isMET.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

B. POA&M (Plan of Action & Milestones)

?Incorrect. APOA&M (Plan of Action and Milestones)is usedonly when a deficiency remains unresolved. Since the deficiency is already corrected, this option does not apply.

C. NOT MET

?Incorrect. A practice is scoredNOT METonly if the deficiency hasnotbeen corrected by the end of the assessment.

D. NOT APPLICABLE

?Incorrect. A practice is markedNOT APPLICABLE (N/A)only if it doesnot apply to the organization’s environment, which is not the case here.

CMMC Official References

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Defines scoring criteria for MET, NOT MET, and POA&M.

Thus,option A (MET) is the correct answer, as the deficiencies have been corrected before final scoring.

TheRisk Assessment (RA) domainaligns withNIST SP 800-171 control family 3.11 (Risk Assessment)and is designed to help organizationsidentify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risksthat could impact their operations.

TheRA.3.144 practice(which is a CMMC Level 2 requirement) explicitly states:

"Periodically assess therisktoorganizational operations (including mission, functions, image, or reputation), organizational assets, and individualsresulting from the operation of organizational systems and the associated processing, storage, or transmission of CUI."

This means that OSCs (Organizations Seeking Certification) should regularly evaluate risks to:

?Organizational operations(e.g., mission, business continuity, functions)

?Organizational assets(e.g., data, IT systems, intellectual property)

?Individuals(e.g., employees, contractors, customers affected by security risks)

Thus, the correct answer isC. Organizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

A. Organizational operations, business assets, and employees

?Incorrect."Business assets"is not the correct terminology used in CMMC/NIST SP 800-171. Instead,"organizational assets"is the proper term.

B. Organizational operations, business processes, and employees

?Incorrect."Business processes"is not a part of the formal risk assessment requirement. The correct scope includesorganizational assetsandindividuals, not just processes.

D. Organizational operations, organizational processes, and individuals

?Incorrect. While processes are important,organizational assetsmust be considered in the assessment, not just processes.

CMMC Official References

CMMC 2.0 Model (Level 2 - RA.3.144)– Specifies that risk assessments must coverorganizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals.

NIST SP 800-171 (3.11.1)– Reinforces the same risk assessment scope.

Thus,option C (Organizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals) is the correct answerbased on official CMMC risk assessment requirements.

DFARS clause 252.204-7012 establishes the safeguarding of Covered Defense Information (CDI), which aligns with CUI categories. The clause specifies that the DoD is responsible for determining whether information is Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and marking it accordingly before sharing it with contractors. Contractors do not make determinations about what constitutes CUI; they are responsible for safeguarding information once it is received and marked as CUI.

Reference Documents:

DFARS 252.204-7012,Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

CMMC Model v2.0 Overview, December 2021

CMMCLevel 1focuses onbasic cyber hygieneand includes17 practicesderived fromNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2butonly covers the protection of Federal Contract Information (FCI)—not Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

UnlikeLevel 2, which aligns fully withNIST SP 800-171,Level 1 does not require third-party certificationand can beself-assessedby the organization.

Domains Covered in a Level 1 Self-Assessment

CMMC Level 1 practices fall underthree specific domains:

Access Control (AC)– Ensures that only authorized individuals can access FCI.

Physical Protection (PE)– Protects physical access to systems and facilities storing FCI.

Identification and Authentication (IA)– Verifies the identity of users accessing systems containing FCI.

These domains focus on foundational security controls necessary toprotect FCI from unauthorized access.

Official CMMC 2.0 Documentation References

CMMC Model v2.0states thatLevel 1 includes only 17 practicesmapped toNIST SP 800-171requirements specific toAccess Control (AC), Physical Protection (PE), and Identification and Authentication (IA).

CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 1confirms thatRisk Management (RM) and Media Protection (MP) are not included in Level 1, as they pertain to more advanced security measures needed for handlingCUI (Level 2).

Breakdown of Answer Choices

A. Access Control (AC), Risk Management (RM), and Media Protection (MP)? Incorrect.Risk Management (RM) and Media Protection (MP) are Level 2 domains.

B. Risk Management (RM), Access Control (AC), and Physical Protection (PE)? Incorrect.Risk Management (RM) is not part of Level 1.

C. Access Control (AC), Physical Protection (PE), and Identification and Authentication (IA)?Correct.These are thethree domains covered in CMMC Level 1 self-assessments.

D. Risk Management (RM), Media Protection (MP), and Identification and Authentication (IA)? Incorrect.Risk Management (RM) and Media Protection (MP) are Level 2 domains.

Conclusion

Thecorrect answer is C. Access Control (AC), Physical Protection (PE), and Identification and Authentication (IA), as these are theonly three domains included in a CMMC Level 1 Self-Assessmentaccording toCMMC 2.0 documentation and NIST SP 800-171 mapping.

Reference Documents for Further Reading

CMMC 2.0 Model Overview – DoD Official Documentation

CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 1

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 (Basic Security Requirements for FCI)

How Many Practices Are Included in CMMC Level 2?

CMMC Level 2is designed to alignfullywithNIST SP 800-171, which consists of110 security controls (practices).

This meansall 110 practicesfrom NIST SP 800-171 are required for aCMMC Level 2 certification.

Breakdown of Practices in CMMC 2.0

CMMC Level

Number of Practices

Level 1

17 practices(Basic Cyber Hygiene)

Level 2

110 practices(Aligned with NIST SP 800-171)

Level 3

Not yet finalized but expected to exceed 110

Since CMMC Level 2 mandatesall 110 NIST SP 800-171 practices, the correct answer isC. 110 practices.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

A. 17 practices

?Incorrect.17 practicesapply only toCMMC Level 1, not Level 2.

B. 72 practices

?Incorrect. There is no CMMC level with72 practices.

D. 180 practices

?Incorrect. CMMC Level 2only requires 110 practices, not 180.

CMMC Official References

CMMC 2.0 Model– Confirms thatLevel 2 includes 110 practicesaligned withNIST SP 800-171.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2– Outlines the110 security controlsrequired for handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Thus,option C (110 practices) is the correct answer, as per official CMMC guidance.

Understanding the Definition of a "Practice" in CMMC 2.0

In CMMC 2.0, the term"practice"refers to specific cybersecurity activities that organizations must implement to achieve compliance with defined security objectives.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

Definition from CMMC Documentation:

According to theCMMC Model Overview, apracticeis defined as:

"An activity or activities performed to meet defined CMMC objectives."

This means that practices are theactions and implementations required to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Federal Contract Information (FCI).

How Practices Fit into CMMC 2.0:

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 consists of17 practices, which align withFAR 52.204-21 (Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems).

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 consists of110 practices, aligned directly withNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2.

Each practice has anobjectivethat must be met to demonstrate compliance.

Official CMMC 2.0 References:

TheCMMC 2.0 Model Documentationdefines practices as "the fundamental cybersecurity activities necessary to achieve security objectives."

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideoutlines how assessors verify the implementation of these practices during an assessment.

TheNIST SP 800-171A Guideprovidesassessment objectivesfor each practice to ensure they are implemented effectively.

Comparison with Other Answer Choices:

A. A business transaction? Incorrect. CMMC practices focus on cybersecurity activities, not financial or operational transactions.

B. A condition arrived at by experience or exercise? Incorrect. While practices evolve over time, they are defined activities, not just experience-based conditions.

C. A series of changes taking place in a defined manner? Incorrect. A practice is a set of security actions, not just a process of change.

Conclusion:

ACMMC practicerefers to specificcybersecurity activities performed to meet defined CMMC objectives. This makesOption Dthe correct answer.

Under NIST SP 800-171, Personnel Security (PS) family, requirement PS.L2-3.9.1, organizations must screen individuals prior to granting access to CUI. The screening is intended to evaluate conduct, integrity, and loyalty to ensure that individuals can be trusted with sensitive information.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, PS.L2-3.9.1: “Screen individuals prior to authorizing access to organizational systems containing CUI… Screening is intended to assess an individual’s conduct, integrity, judgment, loyalty, and reliability.”

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide (Personnel Security practices): confirms that screening covers conduct, integrity, and loyalty.

Why Option C is Correct:

The key attributes explicitly listed are conduct, integrity, and loyalty.

Options A and B describe subjective or informal measures, not compliance criteria.

Option D uses terms not aligned with the official requirement.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, Personnel Security controls.

CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 2 – PS.L2-3.9.1.

===========

Understanding the Reporting Process in a CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Assessment

ACMMC Level 2 Assessmentconducted by aCertified Third-Party Assessor Organization (C3PAO)follows a structured approach to gathering evidence, evaluating compliance, and reporting findings to theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC). The reporting process is outlined in theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, which specifies how findings should be communicated.

Assessment Communication Structure

Daily Checkpoints:

Throughout the assessment, the assessor team holdsdaily checkpoint meetingswith the OSC to provide updates on progress, observations, and preliminary findings.

These checkpoints help ensure transparency and allow the OSC to address minor issues as they arise.

Final Results Delivery:

Thefinal assessment resultsare typically shared during thefinal daily checkpointOR in aseparately scheduled findings and recommendations reviewmeeting.

This ensures that the OSC receives a structured and complete summary of the assessment findings before the official report is submitted.

Why Option C is Correct

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, Section 4.5clearly states that assessment findings should be presentedeither at the last daily checkpoint or during a separately scheduled final review.

This aligns with best practices formaintaining transparency and ensuring the OSC has clarity on their assessment resultsbefore the final report submission.

Option A (End of every day)is incorrect because while assessors do provide updates, they do not deliver the "final results" daily.

Option B (Daily and a separate final review)is misleading, as the CAP Guide allows assessors tochoosebetween the final daily checkpoint OR a separate findings review—not both.

Option D (After C3PAO approval)is incorrect because theC3PAO does not approve findings before they are communicated to the OSC. The assessment team directly presents the results first.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, Section 4.5: Reporting and Findings Communication

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Assessment Process Overview

CMMC Assessment Final Report Guidelines

Final Verification

Based on officialCMMC 2.0 documentation, thefinal assessment results should be presented to the OSC either at the last daily checkpoint or in a separately scheduled review session, making Option C the correct answer.

In the context of a Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) assessment, the roles and responsibilities of individuals involved are clearly delineated to ensure a structured and effective evaluation process. The term "applicable staff" refers to personnel within the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) who possess specific knowledge or expertise pertinent to the assessment. These individuals are integral to the assessment process as they provide essential information, demonstrate the implementation of security practices, and facilitate the assessment team's understanding of the organization's cybersecurity posture.

In this scenario, the employee serving as the primary system administrator is responsible for managing and maintaining the organization's systems. Given their comprehensive understanding of the system configurations, security controls, and operational procedures, this individual is best categorized as "applicable staff." Their involvement is crucial during the assessment, as they can provide detailed insights, demonstrate compliance measures, and address technical inquiries from the assessment team.

The other options can be delineated as follows:

Analyzer:Typically refers to individuals who analyze data or security incidents, often as part of a security operations center. This role is not specifically defined within the CMMC assessment context.

Inspector:Generally denotes a person who examines or inspects systems and processes, possibly as part of an internal audit or compliance check. This term is not a standard designation within the CMMC assessment framework.

Demonstration staff:While this could imply personnel responsible for demonstrating systems or processes, it is not a recognized role within the CMMC assessment process.

Therefore, the primary system administrator, by virtue of their role and responsibilities, aligns with the "applicable staff" category, playing a pivotal role in facilitating a successful CMMC assessment.

Understanding SI.L2-3.14.6: Monitor Communications for Attacks

The practiceSI.L2-3.14.6fromNIST SP 800-171(aligned with CMMC Level 2) requires an organization tomonitor organizational communications for indicators of attack. This typically includes:

?Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)andIntrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)

?Log analysis and network monitoring

?Incident response planningfor detected threats

As part of aCMMC Level 2 assessment, theCertified CMMC Assessor (CCA)must ensure that theOSC (Organization Seeking Certification)hasproperly implemented and documenteditsmonitoring capabilities.

Why "Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS" is Correct?

TheCCA must collect sufficient objective evidenceto determine compliance.

Reviewing anartifact(such as system configurations, IDS/IPS logs, or security policies)helps validatethat intrusion detection is properly implemented.

Configuration settings providedirect evidenceof whethermonitoring for attacksis effectively applied.

Breakdown of Answer Choices

Option

Description

Correct?

A. Conduct a penetration test

?Incorrect–Penetration testing isnot requiredfor CMMC Level 2 assessments and falls outside an assessor's responsibilities.

B. Interview the intrusion detection system's supplier.

?Incorrect–Thesupplier does not determine compliance; the assessor needs evidence from theOSC’s implementation.

C. Upload known malicious code and observe the system response.

?Incorrect–This would beinvasive testing, which isnot part of a CMMC assessment.

D. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

?Correct – Reviewing system artifacts provides direct evidence of compliance with SI.L2-3.14.6.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 Documentation

NIST SP 800-171 SI.L2-3.14.6– Requires monitoring communications for attack indicators.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– Describesartifact reviewas an essential assessment method.

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isD. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

This aligns withCMMC 2.0 Level 2 assessment requirementsandSI.L2-3.14.6 compliance verification.

Step 1: Responsibility for Subcontractor Compliance

The prime contractor (contractor organization)is responsible for ensuring thatits subcontractorshave the requiredCMMC certification levelbefore engaging them inDoD contracts that involve FCI or CUI.

This requirement is enforced throughflow-down clausesinDFARS 252.204-7021, which mandates that subcontractors handlingCUImeet the necessaryCMMC Level 2 or Level 3 requirements.

The CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) requires that sufficient evidence must:

Cover the sampled organization,

Cover the defined model scope of the assessment (Target CMMC Level), and

Correspond to the evidence collection approach.

Evidence is always required, even if the organization holds other certifications such as ISO. External certifications cannot replace CMMC evidence requirements. Thus, the statement that “Evidence is not required if the practice is ISO certified” is not valid.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP), v1.0

CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) 2.0 Level 1 is designed to protectFederal Contract Information (FCI)and consists of17 foundational cybersecurity practices. These practices are directly derived fromFAR 52.204-21(Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems), which outlines minimum security requirements for contractors handling FCI.

Breakdown of CMMC Level 1 Practices

The17 practicesin Level 1 focus on basic cybersecurity hygiene and fall under the following6 domains:

Access Control (AC)– 4 practices

AC.L1-3.1.1: Limit system access to authorized users

AC.L1-3.1.2: Limit user access to authorized transactions and functions

AC.L1-3.1.20: Verify and control connections to external systems

AC.L1-3.1.22: Control information posted or processed on publicly accessible systems

Identification and Authentication (IA)– 2 practices

IA.L1-3.5.1: Identify and authenticate system users

IA.L1-3.5.2: Use multifactor authentication for local and network access

Media Protection (MP)– 1 practice

MP.L1-3.8.3: Sanitize media before disposal or reuse

Physical Protection (PE)– 4 practices

PE.L1-3.10.1: Limit physical access to systems containing FCI

PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity

PE.L1-3.10.4: Maintain audit logs of physical access

PE.L1-3.10.5: Control and manage physical access devices

System and Communications Protection (SC)– 2 practices

SC.L1-3.13.1: Monitor and control communications at system boundaries

SC.L1-3.13.5: Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components

System and Information Integrity (SI)– 4 practices

SI.L1-3.14.1: Identify, report, and correct system flaws in a timely manner

SI.L1-3.14.2: Provide protection from malicious code at designated locations

SI.L1-3.14.4: Update malicious code protection mechanisms periodically

SI.L1-3.14.5: Perform scans of system components and real-time file scans

Official Reference from CMMC 2.0 Documentation

The 17 practices forCMMC Level 1are explicitly listed in theCMMC 2.0 Appendices and Assessment Guide for Level 1, as well as in theFAR 52.204-21 requirements. These practices representbasic safeguarding measuresthat all DoD contractors handlingFCImust implement.

????CMMC 2.0 Level 1 Summary:

Focus:Basic safeguarding of FCI

Total Practices:17

Derived From:FAR 52.204-21

Assessment Type:Self-assessment (annual)

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isB. 17 practicesas verified from theCMMC 2.0 official documentsandFAR 52.204-21 requirements.

Understanding the Principle of Least Functionality in the CM Domain

TheConfiguration Management (CM) domainin CMMC 2.0 focuses on maintaining the security and integrity of an organization’s systems through controlled configurations and restrictions on system capabilities.

The principle ofLeast Functionalityrefers to limiting a system’s features, services, and applications to only those necessary for its intended purpose. This principle reduces the attack surface by minimizing unnecessary components that could be exploited by attackers.

Justification for the Correct Answer: Least Functionality (C)

CMMC Practice CM.L2-3.4.6 (Use Least Functionality)explicitly states:

"Employ the principle of least functionality by configuring organizational systems to provide only essential capabilities."

Thegoalis to prevent unauthorized or unnecessary applications, services, and ports from running on the system.

Examples of Implementation:

Disabling unnecessary services, such as remote desktop access if not required.

Restricting software installation to approved applications.

Blocking unused network ports and protocols.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Least Privilege

This principle (associated with Access Control) ensures that users and processes have only the minimum level of access necessary to perform their jobs.

It is relevant to CMMC PracticeAC.L2-3.1.5 (Least Privilege)but does not define system capabilities.

B. Essential Concern

There is no officially recognized cybersecurity principle called "Essential Concern" in CMMC, NIST, or related frameworks.

D. Separation of Duties

This principle (covered under CMMCAC.L2-3.1.4) ensures that no single individual has unchecked control over critical functions, reducing the risk of fraud or abuse.

While important for security, it does not define essential system capabilities.

Official CMMC and NIST References

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Assessment Guide – Configuration Management (CM) Domain

CM.L2-3.4.6 mandatesleast functionalityto enhance security by removing unnecessary features.

NIST SP 800-171 (which CMMC is based on) – Requirement 3.4.6

States:"Limit system functionality to only the essential capabilities required for organizational missions or business functions."

NIST SP 800-53 – Control CM-7 (Least Functionality)

Provides detailed recommendations on configuring systems to operate with only necessary features.

Conclusion

Theprinciple of Least Functionality (C)is the basis for defining essential system capabilities in theConfiguration Management (CM) domainof CMMC 2.0. By applying this principle, organizations reduce security risks by ensuring that only the necessary functions, services, and applications are enabled.

During aCMMC assessment, assessors rely on interviews to validate the implementation of cybersecurity practices within anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC). Ensuringconfidentiality and non-attributionallows employees to speak freely without fear of retaliation or bias, leading to more accurate and candid responses.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

CMMC Assessment Process and the Role of Interviews

TheCMMC Assessment Guide(Level 2) states thatinterviews are a key methodto verify compliance with security controls.

Employees may hesitate to provide truthful information if they fear negative consequences.

To obtain accurate information, assessors must create an environment where team members feel safe.

Ensuring Non-Attribution for Accurate Responses

DoD Assessment Methodologyhighlights thatinterviewees should remain anonymousin reports.

Non-attribution reduces the risk of OSC leadership influencing responses or retaliating against employees.

Employees are more likely to provideaccurateandhonestdescriptions of their responsibilities when confidentiality is guaranteed.

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Interview groups of people to get collective answers:

Group interviews may limit honest responses due topeer pressure or management presence.

Employees mayhesitate to contradictsupervisors or peers in a group setting.

(B) Understand that testing is more important than interviews:

While testing (e.g., reviewing logs, configurations, and security settings) is crucial, interviews providecontexton how security practices are implemented and followed.

Interviewscomplementtesting rather than being less important.

(D) Let team members know the questions prior to the assessment:

Advanced notice may allow employees toprepare rehearsed answers, which might not reflect actual practices.

This couldreduce the effectivenessof the interview process.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

TheCMMC Assessment Process Guideand DoDAssessment Methodologyemphasize the importance of confidentiality in interviews to ensure accuracy.Non-attribution protects employees and ensures assessors get honest, unfiltered answers.

Thus, the correct answer is:

C. Ensure confidentiality and non-attribution of team members.

The correct answer isA. CMMC Assessment Reporting Requirementsbecause this document specifically outlines thestructured processthat Certified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs) must follow when conducting and reporting CMMC assessments.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

Understanding the CMMC Assessment Process

TheLead Assessorbriefs the team on theassessment requirementsand theevaluation criteriabefore the assessment begins.

Throughout the assessment,findings summaries, practice ratings, and level recommendationsare documented and reported.

These findings are internally reviewed by theC3PAObefore they are formally submitted forquality review and final rating approval.

Key Document Stipulating Reporting Requirements: CMMC Assessment Reporting Requirements

This documentspecifically details how assessments must be reportedwithin theCMMC ecosystem.

It describes the structured process for assessment submission, internalC3PAO reviews, andquality checks by the CMMC-ABbefore an organization can receive a final certification decision.

It ensures thatresults are consistent, transparent, and aligned with DoD cybersecurity compliance expectations.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. DFARS 52.204-21 Assessment Reporting Requirements

This clause only specifiesbasic safeguardingof Federal Contract Information (FCI) but doesnotdictate the reporting process for CMMC assessments.

C. NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2 Assessment Reporting Requirements

WhileNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2outlines security controls, it doesnotdefine how CMMC assessments must be conducted and reported.

D. DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 Assessment Reporting Requirements

This DFARS clause focuses onincident reportingandcyber incident response requirementsbut does not detail theCMMC assessment reporting process.

Official Reference:

CMMC Assessment Reporting Requirements, issued byThe Cyber ABandDoD, governs how C3PAOs must report assessment results.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP)also outlines reporting workflows for certification.

Thus, theCMMC Assessment Reporting Requirementsdocument is the authoritative source that dictates the reporting procedures for CMMC assessments.

According to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and the C3PAO Authorization Requirements, every assessment conducted by a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) must undergo a formal Quality Management System (QMS) review before the results are finalized and uploaded to the eMASS (Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service) or the SPRS (Supplier Performance Risk System).

The Quality Review Requirement: The CAP explicitly states that the C3PAO is responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the assessment findings. Before the Assessment Team Lead can formally submit the package, a person or team within the C3PAO (who was ideally not part of the active assessment team to ensure objectivity) must conduct an internal review. This review ensures that the evidence collected supports the "Met" or "Not Met" determinations and that all CMMC methodology requirements were followed.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: While there may be administrative costs associated with maintaining C3PAO status, paying a specific "per-submission fee" is not a mandatory procedural stepwithin the assessment lifecyclethat governs the validity of the results.

Option C: The Cyber AB (CMMC-AB) provides the platform and oversight, but a "forthcoming notification" is not a formal requirement in the CAP; the act of submission itself serves as the notification.

Option D: While a final briefing is a "best practice" and usually occurs during the "Post-Assessment" phase, the internal quality review (Option B) is the regulatory mandate that must be completed to ensure the C3PAO's certification of the results is valid and defensible.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0: Section on "Phase 4: Reporting Results," specifically the sub-section on C3PAO Quality Assurance Review.

C3PAO Quality Management System (QMS) Requirements: Outlines the necessity for internal validation of assessment packages to maintain accreditation.

According to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and the CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide, the assessment methodology is derived directly from NIST SP 800-171A. The framework defines three fundamental assessment methods used by a C3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization) to determine if a practice is "Met." These are:

Examine: This involves reviewing, inspecting, or analyzing assessment objects. As per the CCP curriculum, these objects include documents (policies, procedures, plans), mechanisms (hardware, software, or firmware safeguards), or activities (logs, system configurations).

Interview: This involves holding discussions with personnel within the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) to facilitate understanding or obtain evidence.

Test: This involves exercising assessment objects (mechanisms or activities) under specific conditions to compare actual behavior with expected behavior.

Detailed Breakdown of the Options:

Option A is correct because "documents, mechanisms, or activities" are the specific categories of assessment objects defined in the CMMC/NIST 171A methodology that are subjected to the Examine method.

Option B refers to specific technical components, which are types of mechanisms but do not represent the full scope of the assessment methods.

Option C lists specific examples of evidence, but is not the formal definition of the "Examine" method components.

Option D describes specific "Test" or "Interview" activities rather than the categorical objects of the "Examine" method.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 2: Section on "Assessment Methods" (derived from NIST SP 800-171A).

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP): Defines the evidence collection phase and the application of Examine, Interview, and Test (E-I-T).

NIST SP 800-171A: The source document defining the "Assessment Objects" as specifications (documents), mechanisms, and activities.

What Happens in Phase 4 of the CMMC Assessment Process?

Phase 4 of theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)is theFinal Reporting and Decision Phase. During this phase, theLead Assessormust:

Review all assessment findings

Determine the Organization Seeking Certification’s (OSC) eligibility for certification

Make a recommendation to the C3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization)

Key Responsibilities of the Lead Assessor in Phase 4:

Ensure that the OSC hasmet the required practices and processes.

Confirm that anydeficiencieshave been corrected or appropriately documented.

Recommendwhether the OSC is eligible for certificationbased on assessment results.

Since theLead Assessor must determine and recommend the OSC’s eligibilityto the C3PAO, the correct answer isB. Eligibility.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

A. Ability

?Incorrect. While assessing an OSC’s ability to meet CMMC requirements is part of the process, the final determination in Phase 4 is abouteligibilityfor certification.

C. Capability

?Incorrect. Capability refers to an organization'stechnical and operational readiness. The Lead Assessor is making a recommendation oneligibility, not just capability.

D. Suitability

?Incorrect. Suitability is not a defined term in theCMMC CAP processfor final assessment recommendations. The correct term iseligibility.

CMMC Official References

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Specifies that the Lead Assessor must determine and recommend theeligibilityof the OSC in Phase 4.

CMMC 2.0 Model– Defines the assessment process, including certification decision-making.

Thus,option B (Eligibility) is the correct answer, as per official CMMC guidance.

During a Readiness Review (Phase 1), the purpose is to validate whether an OSC is prepared to move forward with a formal assessment. The CAP specifies that the Lead Assessor must collect sufficient evidence for each practice to make a preliminary determination of readiness.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CAP v2.0, Readiness Review (§2.14): “The Lead Assessor must collect a sufficient amount of evidence for each practice to determine the OSC’s readiness.”

Why Option A is Correct:

The requirement is for sufficient evidence; CAP does not mandate a set number of assessment objects or methods.

Options B, C, and D incorrectly suggest minimum counts or methods that are not part of the readiness review requirements.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0, Phase 1 Readiness Review.

===========

A Certified CMMC Instructor (CCI) is only authorized to deliver CMMC-AB (now The Cyber AB) approved training courses through a Licensed Training Provider (LTP). CCI instructors do not deliver DFARS or NARA CUI training under CMMC authorization—only formally approved CMMC courses.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CMMC Ecosystem Roles: “CCIs are authorized to deliver CMMC-AB approved training courses through an LTP.”

Why Option A is Correct:

CCIs teach only CMMC-AB approved training.

Options B, C, and D include external trainings (DFARS or NARA CUI) that are not within the CCI’s scope.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Ecosystem documentation – Roles and Responsibilities of LTPs and CCIs.

===========

Understanding the CMMC Level 2 Final Report Requirements

For aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theFinal CMMC Assessment Results Reportmust include:

Assessment findings for each practice

Final ratings (MET or NOT MET) for each practice

A detailed rationale for each practice rated as NOT MET

Why "B. Documented rationale for each failed practice" is Correct?

The CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guidestates that if a practice is markedNOT MET, theassessors must provide a rationale explaining why it failed.

This rationale helps theOSC understand what needs remediationand, if applicable, whether the deficiency can be addressed via aPlan of Action & Milestones (POA&M).

TheFinal Report serves as an official recordand must be submitted as part of theresults package.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect?

A. Affirmation for each practice or control (Incorrect)

While the report includes aMET/NOT MET ratingfor each practice,affirmation is not a required component.

C. Suggested improvements for each failed practice (Incorrect)

Assessors do not provide recommendations for improvement—they only document findings and rationale.

Providing suggestions would create aconflict of interestperCMMC-AB Code of Professional Conduct.

D. Gaps or deltas due to any reciprocity model are recorded as met (Incorrect)

If an organization isleveraging reciprocity (e.g., FedRAMP, Joint Surveillance Voluntary Assessments), gapsmust still be documented—not automatically marked as "MET."

Conclusion

The correct answer isB. Documented rationale for each failed practice, as this is amandatory requirement in the Final CMMC Assessment Results Report.

ACertified CMMC Professional (CCP)advising anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)must ensure thatFederal Contract Information (FCI)andControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)are properly documented within required security documents.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

?1. System Security Plan (SSP)

CMMC Level 2requires anSSPto documenthow CUI is protected, including:

Security controlsimplemented

Asset categorization(CUI Assets, Security Protection Assets, etc.)

Policies and proceduresfor handling CUI

?2. Asset Inventory

Anasset inventorylistsall relevant IT systems, applications, and hardwarethat store, process, or transmitCUI or FCI.

TheCMMC Scoping Guiderequires OSCs to identifyCUI-relevant assetsas part of their compliance.

?3. Network Diagram

Anetwork diagramvisually representshow data flows across systems, showing:

WhereCUI is transmitted and stored

Security boundaries protectingCUI Assets

Connectivity betweenCUI Assets and Security Protection Assets

?4. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(B) Within the hardware inventory, data flow diagram, and in the network diagram?

While adata flow diagramis useful,hardware inventory alone is insufficientto document CUI.

(C) Within the asset inventory, in the proposal response, and in the network diagram?

Aproposal responseis not a required document for CMMC assessments.

(D) In the network diagram, in the SSP, within the base inventory, and in the proposal response?

Base inventoryis not a specific CMMC documentation requirement.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

TheCMMC Assessment Guideconfirms that FCI and CUI must be documented in:

The SSP

The asset inventory

The network diagram

Thus, the correct answer is:

?A. "In the SSP, within the asset inventory, and in the network diagram."

Step 1: Define Roles – CCP and CCA

CCP (Certified CMMC Professional):

Entry-level certification in the CMMC ecosystem.

Supports assessment activities under the supervision of a CCA.

May assist in consulting roles outside of formal assessments.

CCA (Certified CMMC Assessor):

Certified tolead assessmentsunder the CMMC model.

Requiredfor conductingLevel 2 formal assessments.

Can be part of a C3PAO assessment team or lead it.

Source: CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0, Section 2.3 – Assessment Team Composition

“Level 2 assessments must be led by a Certified CMMC Assessor (CCA), who may be supported by one or more CCPs.”

?Step 2: Citizenship Requirements

CAP v1.0 – Appendix B: Team Composition and Clearance Requirements

“All team members performing Level 2 assessments must be U.S. citizens when handling CUI, regardless of role.”

But forsupporting team members who do not handle CUIor inFCI-only scoping, there is no automatic exclusion based on citizenship.

So:

TheCCA leadsthe team.

CCPs can be team membersregardless of citizenship,unless restricted by contract or CUI handling needs.

?Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. The CCP leads the Level 2 Assessment Team…

?Incorrect. CCPscannot leadLevel 2 assessments.

B. The CCA leads… includes 3 CCP with US Citizenship.

?Incorrect. Citizenship is requiredonly when handling CUI, not a universal requirement.

D. The CCP leads…

?Again, CCPs donot have the authority to leadformal CMMC assessments.

Only aCertified CMMC Assessor (CCA)may lead aLevel 2 Assessment Team, and theymay include CCPs, evennon-U.S. citizens, if citizenship is not a requirement based on contractual or data sensitivity scope.

Understanding SC.L2-3.13.14 – Control and Monitor the Use of VoIP Technologies

TheCMMC 2.0 Level 2requirementSC.L2-3.13.14comes fromNIST SP 800-171, Security Requirement 3.13.14, which mandates that organizations mustcontrol and monitor the use of VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technologiesif used within their system boundary.

If a systemdoes not use VoIP technology, then this control isNot Applicable (N/A)because there is nothing to assess.

Why Option D is Correct

When a requirement is marked as Not Applicable (N/A), it means the OSC does not use the technology or process covered by that controlwithin its assessment boundary.

No assessment procedures are neededsince there is no VoIP system to evaluate.

Option A (Existing telephone system in scope)is incorrect becausetraditional (non-VoIP) telephone systems are not covered by SC.L2-3.13.14—only VoIP is within scope.

Option B (Error, contact the Lead Assessor)is incorrect because markingSC.L2-3.13.14 as N/A is valid if VoIP is not used. This is not an error.

Option C (VoIP in scope but using FIPS-validated encryption, so it doesn’t need to be assessed)is incorrect becauseeven if VoIP uses FIPS-validated encryption, the control would still need to be assessed to ensure monitoring and usage control are in place.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Assessment Guide – SC.L2-3.13.14

NIST SP 800-171, Security Requirement 3.13.14

CMMC Scoping Guidance – Determining Not Applicable (N/A) Practices

Final Verification

IfVoIP is not used within the OSC’s system boundary, the control does not require assessment, making Option D the correct answer.

Understanding Scoping in CMMC Level 1 Self-Assessments

Federal Contract Information (FCI)is any informationnot intended for public releasethat is provided or generated under aU.S. Government contracttodevelop or deliver a product or service.

Enhanced Security Personnel (ESP)refers to employees, contractors, or third parties whohave access to FCIwithin anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC).

UnderCMMC 2.0 Scoping Guidance, anypersonnel, system, or asset with access to FCI is considered in scopefor a CMMC Level 1 assessment.

Why Option A (In scope) is Correct

Since theESP employee has access to FCI, theymustbe included in the assessment scope.

Option B (Out of scope)is incorrect because anyone with access to FCI is automatically considered part of theCMMC Level 1 boundary.

Option C (OSC point of contact)is incorrect because thepoint of contactis typically an administrative or compliance representative, not necessarily someone with FCI access.

Option D (Assessment Team Member)is incorrect because anESP employee is not part of the assessment team but rather a subject of the assessment.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC Level 1 Scoping Guide, Section 2 – Defining Scope for FCI

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Roles and Responsibilities

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.204-21(Basic Safeguarding of FCI)

Final Verification

Since theESP employee has access to FCI, they are consideredin scopefor the CMMC Level 1 self-assessment, makingOption A the correct answer.

According to the CMMC Scoping Guidance, Level 1, the fundamental definition of an FCI Asset is any asset that performs at least one of three primary functions with Federal Contract Information (FCI). These functions are consistently defined across both Level 1 and Level 2 documentation as Processing, Storing, or Transmitting.

Process: In this scenario, the sales representative is "entering FCI data into various fields." The act of inputting, manipulating, or editing data within an application (the spreadsheet) is the definition of processing.

Store: Because the spreadsheet is on the laptop, the data resides on the laptop's hard drive or memory. This constitutes storing.

Transmit: While the prompt focuses on the data entry, a laptop is an endpoint designed to move data across a network (email, cloud uploads, or server saves). In the context of CMMC scoping, assets that handle protected information are categorized by their capability and role in the data lifecycle, which includes transmitting.

Why other options are incorrect:

Options B and D: These include the word "organize." While organizing data is a task a human performs, it is not a formal technical term used in the CMMC or NIST SP 800-171/FAR 52.204-21 definitions to categorize asset functions.

Option A: This option omits "store." Since the spreadsheet exists on the laptop, storage is a primary function being utilized.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Scoping Guidance, Level 1 (Version 2.0): Section 2.0, which defines FCI Assets as assets that "process, store, or transmit FCI."

FAR 52.204-21 (Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems): The regulatory source for Level 1, which applies to systems that "process, store, or transmit" federal contract information.

CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 1: Introduction and Scoping sections, reinforcing the triad of data handling functions.

In the context of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0, particularly at Level 2, organizations are required to implement stringent controls to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). This includes adhering to specific practices related to media protection and physical security.

Media Protection (MP):

MP.L2-3.8.1 – Media Protection: Organizations must protect (i.e., physically control and securely store) system media containing CUI, both paper and digital. This ensures that sensitive information is not accessible to unauthorized individuals.

Defense Innovation Unit

MP.L2-3.8.3 – Media Disposal: It is imperative to sanitize or destroy information system media containing CUI before disposal or release for reuse. This practice prevents potential data breaches from discarded or repurposed media.

Defense Innovation Unit

Physical Protection (PE):

PE.L2-3.10.2 – Monitor Facility: Organizations are required to protect and monitor the physical facility and support infrastructure for organizational systems. This includes ensuring that areas where CUI is processed or stored are secure and access is controlled.

Defense Innovation Unit

Application to the Scenario:

Given that the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) operates within a shared, multi-tenant building and utilizes a common conference room for assessments, the following considerations are crucial:

Reviewing the Evidence File: The evidence file, which contains CUI, should be reviewed on a secure, authorized device to prevent unauthorized access or potential data leakage.

Printing the Evidence File: If printing is necessary, ensure that the printer is located in a secure area, and the printed documents are retrieved immediately to prevent unauthorized viewing.

Making Notes: Any notes derived from the evidence file should be treated with the same level of security as the original document, especially if they contain CUI.

Disposal of Printed Materials: After the assessment, all printed materials and notes containing CUI must be destroyed using a cross-cut shredder. Cross-cut shredding ensures that the information cannot be reconstructed, thereby maintaining confidentiality.

totem.tech

Options A and D are inadequate as they involve leaving sensitive information in unsecured locations, which violates CMMC physical security requirements. Option B, while secure in terms of digital handling, does not address the proper disposal of any physical copies that may have been made. Therefore, Option C is the best practice, aligning with CMMC 2.0 guidelines by ensuring that all physical media containing CUI are properly reviewed, securely stored during use, and thoroughly destroyed when no longer needed.