Score Higher on Verified DQ-1220 | DAMA Data Quality Specialist Exam Questions with Answers

Whether the rule is mandatory is a business governance decision and should be approved through the appropriate Data Owner, Data Steward, or governance authority responsible for the Supplier domain.

A developer can implement a database constraint, but technical implementation does not establish business policy. The organization must determine whether every active supplier genuinely requires a tax identifier, whether exceptions exist by jurisdiction or supplier type, and what consequences should follow when the rule is violated.

The approved rule should be documented as metadata and linked to the relevant business term, physical fields, authoritative sources, threshold, and responsible steward.

This illustrates the separation between governance and execution. Governance defines and authorizes the requirement; operational and technical teams implement the validation and monitoring.

DAMA's public framework places Governance across the Data Management knowledge areas and Metadata Management as the mechanism for maintaining definitions, lineage, and usage context.

Reference Topics: DAMA-DMBOK2 Chapter 3 — Governance and Stewardship; Chapter 13 — Data Quality Rules; Metadata Management; Supplier Master Data.

===============

A complete absence of reported issues immediately after introducing an enterprise Data Issue process is more likely to indicate lack of confidence in the governance process than genuinely flawless enterprise data. The certification material explicitly identifies lack of credibility in the process's ability to effect change as the plausible explanation.

Effective issue management depends on organizational trust. Employees need to believe that documenting an issue will lead to triage, ownership, escalation, root-cause investigation, remediation, and appropriate communication. If previous problems disappeared into a queue without action—or if raising defects creates organizational friction—users may simply stop reporting them.

DAMA-DMBOK2 treats Data Governance implementation as an organizational-change challenge rather than a purely procedural exercise. Governance must demonstrate authority, responsiveness, transparency, and measurable outcomes to establish credibility.

For Data Quality, issue volumes must also be interpreted carefully. “Zero issues reported” is not equivalent to “zero defects.” Complementary evidence should come from profiling, automated monitoring, quality metrics, user feedback, reconciliation, and operational outcomes.

Management should investigate reporting barriers, communicate resolved cases, establish clear escalation paths, and demonstrate that identified problems produce tangible improvements.

Reference Topics: DAMA-DMBOK2 Chapter 3 — Governance Adoption and Credibility; Data Issue Management; Chapter 13 — Issue Identification, Escalation, Root-Cause Analysis and Remediation.

===============

DAMA-DMBOK2 identifies Point-to-Point, Hub-and-Spoke, and Publish-Subscribe as three common interaction models used to transfer data between systems.

In Point-to-Point, one system communicates directly with another. It is straightforward for a small number of systems but becomes difficult to maintain as interfaces proliferate. In Hub-and-Spoke, systems exchange information through a central hub, reducing direct dependencies and supporting greater consistency. In Publish-Subscribe, producing systems publish data while interested consumers subscribe to the relevant data service or event stream. DMBOK2 presents these three patterns explicitly within Data Integration and Interoperability.

The choice of pattern affects Data Quality as well as architecture. Point-to-point designs can create inconsistent transformations when several applications independently consume the same source. Hub-and-spoke designs can centralize transformations and reference mappings. Publish-subscribe supports scalable distribution but requires controlled message definitions and metadata so that every subscriber interprets data consistently.

DAMA therefore recommends choosing an interaction model according to functional, performance, latency, support, and governance requirements rather than allowing integration patterns to emerge independently.

Reference Topics: DAMA-DMBOK2 Chapter 8 — Data Integration and Interoperability; Interaction Models; Point-to-Point; Hub-and-Spoke; Publish-Subscribe; Canonical Models.

===============