The claim introduces a major fact of statement that elucidates that the financial support of the government should be concentrated towards the cities and the reason explains a statement that the importance of doing so is for the well fare and the well being in protecting the cultural and the traditional values of the nation.

It is extremely crucial that the traditional and the cultural values of the nation are protected as they create an identity for the individual and also the nation as the whole. But the statement that the cities are the only representation of the cultural and tradition is flawed. I believe that the cultural and the traditional variations and the facts that are ought to be preserved needs to be focused on the towns and the villages also as they contain the roots of the nation. City on the other hand does hold significant buildings, monuments and the historically significant structures that ought to be protected for the safeguarding of the cultural and the traditional importance of the nation.

It is also important for the nation as a whole to protect the facts especially monuments and historical structures that reflect the traditional aspects and the cultural values of the nation. Government funding plays a key role in the establishment of the same as the financial aspects are crucial in protecting the nature of the tradition and culture.

It is also important that the villages. cultural groups and minorities and the linguistic oriented cultural groups are protected and funds should be allocated for the well being and the development of the same. It is essential that the government funds that are allocated must be carefully spent on the factors that influence the cultural and traditional aspects of the nation.

For example, money should be allocated in order to teach, propagate and the spread the local and vernacular languages. Many European countries have been actively doing the same, for over a period of time.

It is also essential for the people as the tradition and culture creates a form of identity for them and the protection of the cultural and the traditional values and aspects strengthens their identity among the world nations.

The given letter is from the owner of the Sunny side apartment complex to the manager of the buildings and it is regarding the replacement of the showerheads in the buildings and the statement is made making an assumption that in the future there would be more profit if they make the same changes to more profits.

The owner has stated bis perspective by taking into account a generalized view point and also given the lack of evidentiary values creates a dearth and paucity in the statements made by the owner. The weakness in the statement is purely created due to the general assumption of the owner and not based on the data or substantial evidence of the observation made in the changes in the building.

The Drawbacks have been mentioned by the owner but they have not been considered seriously as negative possibilities that might cause them future expenses. The other important aspect is the lack of the consideration given to the various factors. The owners statement are primarily focused on the profits and they negate all other aspects such as the water pressure and the exact data which he clearly states is unavailable till now.

[Without considering the exact usage of the water based on the number of people who

are using, the exact number of shower heads, the total amount of water consumed.

the average supply of water in the building, the totla profit that they might make, the

overheads cost and the cost of installation of the new shower heads all need to

stipulated and then considered on a serious note before they proceed with the

changes.

The owner needs to conduct a proer study of the data rather than making a hyperbolic

assumption that they would meet profits, given that there is not guarantee for the

same.

It is essential for the statement to also consider the extent of profit that they could

make (brought the proposed change.

To conclude, it is essential for the statement postulated in the letter to consider more

comprehensive aspects before arriving at the conclusion that would only undermine

and weaken the perspective of the given letter.

The memo discusses in detail about the statement s made in order to suppose a suggestion that might get more profits for the firm. It is essential that the statements need to be supported by proper data and facts. The given statement is unsupported and is built upon a basic premise of an expected possibility in the future. The memo states that a change in the manner or pattern in which the house is built will probably be helpful for the company to improve its nature and also profit.

The company believes that they would be able to improve the profit by replacing the dining room space with more space for living room and kitchen, they also focus on state of the art kitchen facilities. It is impertaive that the company states the various assumptions and the basis on which these assumptions would be stated. The company has failed to show and prove any given data or fact that ought of lead to the evidence that there might be possible increase in the profits.

The preferential choices of the people have also not been stated any where in the

passage. The random generalization only weaknes and undermiens the statement.

the statement has to be supported with survey from the people or the purchasers

which might provide better insights to the given statements.

It is essential for the company to consider the other factors and look into the sales for

the holistic perpoective rather that from a profit oriented angle.

The type of assumptions made in the memo are subjective and inclined towards a

great extent. which might be flawed in the event of not proving any Isubslantial

evidences.

To conclude. I think that it is essential for the company to substantiate the views and assumptions with better data and facts, failing which it would remain to be flawed. Any assumptions needs to be places on valid and reasonable ideas without which the core of the premise would hold no good.