Get P_SAPEA_2023 Dumps : Verified SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect

Considering Wanderlust's product range and business model, which targets individual customers and offers a wide range of electric car combinations, the Lead to Cash-B2C with Make to Stock variant would be suitable for orders that can be met from existing stock. Similarly, the Lead to Cash-B2C with Make to Order variant would fit the business model when an individual customer orders a combination not available in stock, necessitating production scheduling. Both variants cater to the business-to-consumer (B2C) model and account for the direct sales approach to individual customers.References = These variants would be documented in SAP's Business Process Architecture content, which includes various Lead to Cash process scenarios, adjusted for different business contexts.

From the current Enterprise Architecture practice structure presented for Wanderlust GmbH, it appears that there are dedicated roles for a Chief Enterprise Architect and a Technology Architect. However, the roles of Application Architect and Business Architect are not explicitly mentioned. An Application Architect is crucial for designing and maintaining the application landscape, ensuring that it aligns with business requirements, while a Business Architect is essential for aligning IT strategy with business strategy and understanding the impact of business changes on the architecture. Their absence indicates a gap in ensuring the alignment between business processes and IT systems, as well as in defining and maintaining the application strategy.References = The roles and responsibilities within an Enterprise Architecture framework typically include both Application and Business Architects to ensure a comprehensive approach to aligning IT and business strategies.

For the Chief Enterprise Architect at Wanderlust, it is crucial to map stakeholders according to their stance on the transformation project, which will inform the approach for engagement and communication. The categorization into proponents, opponents, enthusiasts, and resistors is based on the stakeholder's level of support and their readiness for change.

Here's the categorization based on the provided stakeholder feedback:

• SCM SPP Application Owner in IT - Enthusiasts: This stakeholder has begun upskilling in S/4 HANA eSPP, indicating a positive attitude towards the transformation and readiness to embrace new systems.
• Wanderlust Greenbush, Australia Plant Head - Opponents: The plant head discourages consolidation of instances due to the need for flexibility and frequent regulatory changes, showing resistance to the transformation project.
• Wanderlust Europe Business Head - Promoters: The business head favors consolidation to improve end-to-end visibility of the battery supply chain, which indicates support for the transformation initiative.
• Dealer Management Application Owner in IT - Resistors: Preferring continuity due to heavy customization and niche business requirements suggests resistance to change, likely driven by fear of losing position or control over the existing system.

For successful transformation, the Chief Enterprise Architect should actively engage with each type of stakeholder differently, working to mitigate concerns, leveraging enthusiasm, and turning opposition into support wherever possible.

When evaluating the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework for Wanderlust GmbH, you should proceed with the following steps:

• I evaluate both the SAP EA Methodology and TOGAF ADM. I recommend the approach that fits best Wanderlust’s requirements. This step is necessary because the SAP EA Methodology is based on TOGAF ADM, but extends it with additional elements and guidance specific to SAP solutions and customers4. Therefore, you need to compare and contrast the two methodologies and assess which one suits Wanderlust’s needs better. For example, you may consider factors such as the complexity, scope, scale, and objectives of Wanderlust’s architecture projects, as well as the availability of resources, skills, and tools.
• I check whether the SAP Reference Business Architecture and Reference Solution Architecture Content can help to either define the scope of the architecture work or describe a target architecture structure. If they do, I suggest to use the Reference Architecture Content of SAP. This step is beneficial because the SAP Reference Business Architecture and Reference Solution Architecture Content provide a set of pre-defined architectures that cover common business scenarios and solution domains for SAP customers5. Therefore, you can use them as a starting point or a reference point for your architecture work, as they can help you to define the scope, requirements, capabilities, components, patterns, and best practices for your architecture solutions.

Verified References: 4: https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_ENTERPRISE_ARCHITECTURE_FRAMEWORK/60bc20e6e0a24426a817705bcb415220/144c6c88c10a493e985f71bd62f3c905.html?locale=en-US &state=PRODUCTION&version=1.0 | 5: https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_ENTERPRISE_ARCHITECTURE_FRAMEWORK/60bc20e6e0a24426a817705bcb415220/01b0590c66854a5a94796ef0b47c8fcc.html

Identifying the online marketing business capabilities and processes will help to understand the current state of the ecosystem and identify the areas where improvement is needed. For example, if the ecosystem does not have the ability to track leads or manage customer relationships, then these will be areas that need to be addressed.

• Identifying the key organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups that make up the online marketing ecosystem will help to understand the relationships between the different entities in the ecosystem and identify the dependencies between them. For example, if the marketing team relies on the sales team to provide leads, then this dependency will need to be considered when designing the new ecosystem.

The other two options, Identifying a suitable online marketing application that is better integrated with SAP CRM and ECC and can replace the existing one and Drawing an organization map highlighting the inter relationships and hierarchies amongst the above organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups, are not as critical at this stage. The application can be identified and the organization map can be drawn once the business capabilities and processes have been identified and the key organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups have been identified.

Therefore, the best course of action is to identify the online marketing business capabilities and processes and identify the key organizational units, partners, and stakeholder groups that make up the online marketing ecosystem. This will help to understand the current state of the ecosystem and identify the areas where improvement is needed.