Get ATM Dumps : Verified Advanced Test Management Exam v 3.0 – ISTQB

Context Analysis:

The project described has teams using different methodologies (traditional vs. Agile) tailored to their needs.

The "fit for purpose" hybrid approach is explicitly designed to combine methodologies based on team and project requirements.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Sequential:

Incorrect. A sequential approach suggests a traditional waterfall-like model, not a hybrid.

B. Hybrid as a transition to Agile:

Incorrect. This term implies the entire project is transitioning to Agile, which is not the case here.

C. Agile:

Incorrect. Only the development team is Agile; the business team uses a traditional approach.

D. Hybrid as fit for purpose:

Correct. Combines the most effective aspects of both traditional and Agile methodologies to suit the project context.

Syllabus Alignment:

ISTQB defines hybrid models as combinations of methodologies tailored to specific project needs (TM-1.2.4).

References:

ISTQB Advanced Level Test Management Syllabus (TM-1.2.4)?

Estimation Technique Selection:

Extrapolation uses historical data from similar projects to estimate effort for a new one.

Since the current upgrade is 10% larger than the previous one, extrapolation is the most straightforward method.

Evaluation of Options:

A(Function points) focuses on size estimation and is not specific to historical data.

C(Planning poker) andD(Three-point estimation) involve collaborative or probabilistic techniques, not a direct extrapolation.

Bis correct as it directly applies historical project data to estimate effort.

References and Syllabus Alignment:

Effort estimation techniques are covered under "Test Estimation" (TM-2.2.1) in the syllabus??.

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Definition of Cost of Quality (CoQ):CoQ is composed of four components:

Prevention Costs:Costs related to activities to prevent defects (e.g., training, quality planning).

Appraisal Costs:Costs associated with evaluating products to ensure defect-free delivery (e.g., testing).

Internal Failure Costs:Costs due to defects found before delivery to the customer (e.g., rework).

External Failure Costs:Costs from defects discovered after delivery (e.g., warranty claims, reputation damage).

Calculation Process:

Defect Prevention Cost:Given as $10,000 (fixed).

Appraisal Cost:$250 per defect for 200 defects = 250×200=50,000250 \times 200 = 50,000250×200=50,000.

Internal Failure Cost:$200 per defect for 200 defects = 200×200=40,000200 \times 200 = 40,000200×200=40,000.

External Failure Cost:$2,000 per defect for 100 defects = 2,000×100=200,0002,000 \times 100 = 200,0002,000×100=200,000.

Total CoQ:Adding all costs together:

Total CoQ=10,000+50,000+40,000+200,000=300,000.\text{Total CoQ} = 10,000 + 50,000 + 40,000 + 200,000 = 300,000.Total CoQ=10,000+50,000+40,000+200,000=300,000.

Correct Answer and Justification:The total cost is$300,000, making Option A the correct answer.

References and Documentation from Advanced Test Management:

ISTQB Advanced Test Management Syllabus v3.0, Section 2.2.2:This section emphasizes understanding and calculating the cost of quality by segregating it into the four components as seen above??.

ATM Sample Exam Questions 2024 (Example Calculations):Highlights similar numerical examples to calculate CoQ?.

ISTQB Exam Structure Rules v1.9:Ensures alignment with K2-level understanding for cost analysis scenarios in test management?.

Understanding Team Development Phases:

TheStormingphase is where team members often experience conflicts as they establish their roles and relationships.

Resolving conflicts in this phase is essential for team cohesion and productivity.

Competencies Required:

Social competenciesare needed to mediate, facilitate communication, and encourage collaboration.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Forming Professional:

Incorrect. The Forming phase involves team orientation, not conflict resolution.

B. Storming Social:

Correct. This phase requires social skills to address conflicts and foster a productive environment.

C. Norming Personal:

Incorrect. The Norming phase focuses on team cohesion and process standardization.

D. Performing Methodological:

Incorrect. The Performing phase assumes the team is high-functioning and requires minimal intervention.

Syllabus Alignment:

ISTQB emphasizes understanding team dynamics and applying social skills for effective team management during challenging phases (TM-3.1.5).

References:

ISTQB Advanced Level Test Management Syllabus (TM-3.1.5)?

Context Analysis:

Deployment readiness depends on understanding the risk of releasing the software. The metrics provided include execution, design, defect counts, and coverage but do not quantifyresidual risk, which reflects remaining risks post-testing.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Number of tests passed:

Incorrect. While important, it doesn't directly provide insight into the remaining risk.

B. Number of defects outstanding:

Incorrect. Though critical, it’s only one aspect of assessing readiness and doesn’t provide the full picture of residual risk.

C. Residual risk:

Correct. Residual risk quantifies untested areas and unresolved issues, vital for decision-making.

D. Planned vs actual cost of testing:

Incorrect. While useful for process evaluation, it’s not directly tied to deployment readiness.

Syllabus Alignment:

The syllabus emphasizes risk-based approaches, highlighting residual risk as a critical deployment readiness metric (TM-1.3.4).

References:

ISTQB Advanced Level Test Management Syllabus (TM-1.3.4)?