Score Higher on Verified PRINCE2-7-Practitioner | PRINCE2 Project Management Practitioner (Version 7) Exam Questions with Answers

The correct answer is B — Give ongoing direction . The directing a project process is not limited to formal authorization decisions at stage boundaries. The project board also remains available throughout delivery to provide advice, guidance, and direction within its areas of responsibility. This continuing governance activity is captured by give ongoing direction .

In the scenario, the project manager informally consults the CEO of BuildyBrick in the senior supplier interest concerning testing and inspection arrangements for the forthcoming stage. This is specialist, supplier-related advice rather than a request for formal authorization. The senior supplier is appropriately positioned to provide guidance on technical feasibility, specialist resources, supplier capability, and the practical implications of planned quality activities.

Option A would apply when the project board formally reviews and decides whether to authorize a stage plan or exception plan. The scenario occurs while stage 4 is being planned, but the activity described is specifically an informal consultation , not the formal authorization decision itself. Option C concerns authorization of the initiation stage near the start of the project. Option D concerns formal authorization of the overall project following initiation.

The defining feature is therefore the provision of responsive board-level guidance during the project’s life without making a formal authorization decision.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Directing a project; give ongoing direction; senior supplier; project board advice; stage planning; formal versus informal project-board control.

===============

The correct answer is D . PRINCE2 distinguishes between the risk owner and the risk action owner . The risk owner is responsible for managing, monitoring, and controlling an assigned risk, including ensuring that an appropriate response is established. A risk action owner is responsible for carrying out a specific agreed response action.

In the scenario, the project executive may legitimately be assigned ownership if that allocation is appropriate to the nature and significance of the risk. However, the response consists of operational activities—surveying buildings and monitoring vibration—that will actually be performed by specialists. Naming the project manager as the sole action owner merely because the project manager coordinates project delivery does not accurately allocate responsibility for implementing those specific actions.

Option A therefore overstates the requirement for the project manager to own every response action. Option B focuses only on seniority and potential effect on business justification, rather than addressing the inappropriate action ownership. Option C is incorrect because PRINCE2 does not require the risk owner and risk action owner to be the same person.

Clear allocation matters because it establishes precisely who monitors the overall exposure and who is accountable for implementing each agreed response action.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Risk practice; risk owner; risk action owner; risk responses; ownership and accountability; risk register.

===============

The correct answer is B . PRINCE2 7 is designed to be tailored to the organizational environment in which a project operates. It specifies the purpose and required governance of the business case rather than requiring every organization to use identical terminology or documentation structures.

The City Council already has a mature and standardized procedure. Its strategic business case provides the early justification during starting up a project, and the more detailed business case is then developed during initiating a project. Functionally, this follows the PRINCE2 lifecycle in which an initial justification is established early and subsequently refined into a sufficiently detailed business case for project authorization and ongoing decision-making.

Option C treats the label “outline business case” as mandatory. PRINCE2 tailoring allows established corporate terminology and management products to be used where they fulfil the required purpose and preserve the necessary controls. Option A refers to multiple analytical perspectives but does not address the central issue in the scenario: whether the Council’s established business-case procedure may legitimately be used. Option D is incorrect because the existence of a portfolio office does not transfer all project-level responsibility for developing and maintaining the project’s business justification away from the project organization.

The key consideration is equivalence of purpose and control, not rigid terminology.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Business case practice; tailoring; organizational standards; starting up a project; initiating a project; continued business justification.

===============