Get C_TS414_2023 Dumps : Verified SAP Certified Associate - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Quality Management

The 8D methodology in SAP QM is an internal problem-solving process triggered by quality issues:

Defects Recording for an Inspection Lot (A): Recording defects in an inspection lot (e.g., transaction QE51N) can initiate an 8D process via a linked notification (e.g., Q2), a standard starting point (SPRO > QM > Quality Notifications > 8D Methodology).

Item of a Quality Notification (C): The notification item (e.g., in QM01) directly supports 8D by documenting the problem (D1) and subsequent steps, a primary entry point.

Defect of Defect Category Generic Defect (B): "Generic Defect" isn’t a standard category; defect types are specific (e.g., production, supplier).

Defect of the Defect Category Production Defect (D): While relevant, it’s the act of recording (A) or notification (C) that starts 8D, not the category alone.

Thus, "Defects recording for an inspection lot" and "Item of a quality notification" are the correct answers.References: SAP Help Portal - "8D Methodology in QM"; SAP S/4HANA QM User Guide -"Problem Solving".

Partner determination in QM notifications (e.g., transaction QM01) assigns partners (e.g., responsible person) via:

Assignment to the Notification Type (D): The partner determination procedure is assigned in Customizing (SPRO > QM > Quality Notifications > Notification Creation > Define Notification Types), linking specific partner roles (e.g., coordinator) to a notification type (e.g., Q1 for customer complaints). This is the standard approach.

Notification Origin (A): Origins (e.g., 01 for GR) don’t directly assign partner procedures.

Material Type (B): Material types are MM settings, not linked to QM partner determination.

Material Master (C): Material master doesn’t store partner procedures for notifications.

Thus, "Assignment to the notification type" is the correct answer.References: SAP Help Portal - "Partner Determination in QM Notifications"; SAP S/4HANA QM Customizing Guide - "Notification Types".

For clean core integrations in SAP S/4HANA (minimizing custom code):

SOAP (A): SAP recommends SOAP APIs for robust, secure integrations (e.g., enterprise services), supporting clean core by leveraging standard interfaces.

OData (D): OData is the preferred RESTful API type for S/4HANA, enabling flexible, standard integrations (e.g., via SAP Gateway), a cornerstone of clean core.

RFC (B): Remote Function Calls are legacy and less favored for clean core due to tight coupling.

IDoc (C): IDocs are traditional EDI-focused, not prioritized for modern clean core integrations.

Thus, "SOAP" and "OData" are the correct answers.References: SAP Help Portal - "Integration APIs in S/4HANA"; SAP S/4HANA Developer Guide - "Clean Core APIs".

The SAP Fiori app "Record Inspection Results" (App ID: F2170) in SAP S/4HANA QM supports specific result recording types for inspection lots:

Recording of Single Inspection Results (B): This allows entering individual values for quantitative or qualitative characteristics (e.g., one value per sample), a standard feature in the app for detailed recording.

Summarized Inspection Results Recording (D): The app supports entering a single aggregated value (e.g., average) for a characteristic, ideal for summarized quantitative data, as configured in the MIC control indicators.

Classed Inspection Results Recording (A): Classed recording (grouping results into ranges) is supported in classic transactions (e.g., QE51N) but not explicitly in the standard Fiori app’s functionality.

Results Recording for Inspection Points (C): While inspection points are supported in QM, the Fiori app focuses on lot-level recording and doesn’t emphasize point-specific recording in its standard scope.

Thus, "Recording of single inspection results" and "Summarized inspection results recording" are the correct answers.References: SAP Help Portal - "Record Inspection Results Fiori App"; SAP S/4HANA QM User Guide - "Fiori Apps in QM".

Inspection points in SAP QM (configured in the inspection plan header, transaction QP01) allow multiple recordings within an inspection lot. Standard types include:

Inspection Point for Sample (A): Used for physical samples (e.g., per sample drawn), defined via inspection point type "1" (sample-based) in Customizing (SPRO > QM > Quality Planning > Inspection Planning > Define Inspection Point Types). Common in goods receipt or production.

Inspection Point for Functional Location (C): Type "3" supports inspections tied to functional locations (Plant Maintenance integration), used for equipment or facility checks within QM.

Inspection Point for Equipment (E): Type "2" links to equipment master records (PM), enabling equipment-specific inspection points in QM processes.

Inspection Point for Incoming Certificates (B): Certificates are managed separately (e.g., quality certificates in procurement), not as an inspection point type.

Inspection Point for Defects Recording (D): Defects are recorded within inspection points, but this is not a distinct type; it’s a function of existing types.

Thus, "Inspection point for sample," "Inspection point for functional location," and "Inspection point for equipment" are the correct answers.References: SAP Help Portal - "Inspection Points in QM"; SAP S/4HANA QM Customizing Guide - "Inspection Point Types".