Winter Special - 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: c4sdisc65

Safe & Secure
Payments

Customers
Services

Money Back
Guarantee

Download Free
Demo

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager PDF

$38.5

$109.99

3 Months Free Update

  • Questions: 60 Q&A's With Detailed Explanation
  • Printable Format
  • Value of Money
  • 100% Pass Assurance
  • Verified Answers
  • Researched by Industry Experts
  • Based on Real Exams Scenarios

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager PDF + Testing Engine

$61.6

$175.99

3 Months Free Update

  • Exam Name: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager
  • Last Update: 04-Dec-2024
  • Questions and Answers: 60
  • Single Choice: 60 Q&A's

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Engine

$46.2

$131.99

3 Months Free Update

  • Best Testing Engine
  • One Click installation
  • Recommended by Teachers
  • Easy to use
  • 3 Modes of Learning
  • State of Art Technology
  • 100% Real Questions included

Last Week Results!

20

Customers Passed
PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager

90%

Average Score In Real
Exam At Testing Centre

86%

Questions came word by
word from this dump

Get ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps : Verified PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager

An Exclusive 94.1% Success Rate...

For more than a decade, Crack4sure’s ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager study guides and dumps are providing the best help to a great number of clients all over the world for exam preparation and passing it. The wonderful PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager success rate using our innovative and exam-oriented products made thousands of ambitious IT professionals our loyal customers. Your success is always our top priority and for that our experts are always bent on enhancing our products.

This unique opportunity is available through our PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager testing engine that provides you with real exam-like practice tests for pre-exam evaluation. The practice questions and answers have been taken from the previous ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam and are likely to appear in the next exam too. To obtain a brilliant score, you need to keep practicing with practice questions and answers.

Concept of PECB ISO/IEC 27005 Exam Preparation

Instead of following the ages-old concept of PECB ISO/IEC 27005 exam preparation using voluminous books and notes, Crack4sure has introduced a brief, to-the-point, and most relevant content that is extremely helpful in passing any certification PECB ISO/IEC 27005 exam. For an instance, our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dec 2024 updated study guide covers the entire syllabus with a specific number of questions and answers. The simulations, graphs, and extra notes are used to explain the answers where necessary.

Maximum Benefit within Minimum Time

At crack4sure, we want to facilitate the ambitious IT professionals who want to pass different certification exams in a short period of time but find it tough to spare time for detailed studies or take admission in preparatory classes. With Crack4sure’s PECB ISO/IEC 27005 study guides as well as ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager dumps, it is super easy and convenient to prepare for any certification exam within days and pass it. The easy information, provided in the latest Dec 2024 ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager questions and answers does not prove a challenge to understand and memorize. The PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam takers feel confident within a few days of study that they can answer any question on the certification syllabus.

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Questions and Answers

Question # 1

Which statement regarding risks and opportunities is correct?

A.

Risksalways have a positive outcomewhereas opportunities have an unpredicted outcome

B.

Opportunities might have a positive impact, whereas risks might have a negative impact

C.

There is no difference between opportunities and risks; these terms can be used interchangeably

Question # 2

Scenario 7: Adstry is a business growth agency that specializes in digital marketing strategies. Adstry helps organizations redefine the relationships with their customers through innovative solutions. Adstry is headquartered in San Francisco and recently opened two new offices in New York. The structure of the company is organized into teams which are led by project managers. The project manager has the full power in any decision related to projects. The team members, on the other hand, report the project’s progress to project managers.

Considering that data breaches and ad fraud are common threats in the current business environment, managing risks is essential for Adstry. When planning new projects, each project manager is responsible for ensuring that risks related to a particular project have been identified, assessed, and mitigated. This means that project managers have also the role of the risk manager in Adstry. Taking into account that Adstry heavily relies on technology to complete their projects, their risk assessment certainly involves identification of risks associated with the use of information technology. At the earliest stages of each project, the project manager communicates the risk assessment results to its team members.

Adstry uses a risk management software which helps the project team to detect new potential risks during each phase of the project. This way, team members are informed in a timely manner for the new potential risks and are able to respond to them accordingly. The project managers are responsible for ensuring that the information provided to the team members is communicated using an appropriate language so it can be understood by all of them.

In addition, the project manager may include external interested parties affected by the project in the risk communication. If the project manager decides to include interested parties, the risk communication is thoroughly prepared. The project manager firstly identifies the interested parties that should be informed and takes into account their concerns and possible conflicts that may arise due to risk communication. The risks are communicated to the identified interested parties while taking into consideration the confidentiality of Adstry’s information and determining the level of detail that should be included in the risk communication. The project managers use the same risk management software for risk communication with external interested parties since it provides a consistent view of risks. For each project, the project manager arranges regular meetings with relevant interested parties of the project, they discuss the detected risks, their prioritization, and determine appropriate treatment solutions. The information taken from the risk management software and the results of these meetings are documented and are used for decision-making processes. In addition, the company uses a computerized documented information management system for the acquisition, classification, storage, and archiving of its documents.

Based on scenario 7, the risk management software is used to help Adstry’s teams to detect new risks throughout all phases of the project. Is this necessary?

A.

Yes, Adstry; should establish adequate procedures to monitor and review risks on a regular basis in order to identity the changes at an early stage

B.

Yes, according to ISO/IEC 27005, Adstry; must use an automated solution for identifying and analyzing risks related to information technology throughout all phases of a project

C.

No. monitoring risks after a project is initiated will not provide important information that could impact Adstry'.s business objectives

Question # 3

Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.

Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list ofthe identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.

Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteria. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.

In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.

Based on scenario 3, what does the complicated user interface of the software which could lead to error present?

A.

A vulnerability

B.

A threat

C.

An asset

Question # 4

Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape’s teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients’ confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conductsregular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.

The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.

Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape’s objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as “low,” “medium,” or “high.” They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as “low,” no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as “high” or “medium,” additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape’s team were as follows:

1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape’s website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.

2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.

3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.

The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as “medium.” One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated “build and deploy” process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.

The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as “medium.” Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company’s systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.

The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as “high.” Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was toohigh for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.

Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to monitor the remaining risk after risk treatment. Is this necessary?

A.

No, there is no need to monitor risks that meet the risk acceptance criteria

B.

No, unless the risk has a severe impact if it occurs, there is no need to monitor the risk

C.

Yes, the remaining risk after risk treatment should be monitored and reviewed

Question # 5

Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.

Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.

Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteria. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.

In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.

Based on scenario 3, Printary used a list of identified events that could negatively influence the achievement of its information security objectives to identify information security risks. Is this in compliance with the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005?

A.

No, a list of risk scenarios with their consequences related to assets or events and their likelihood should be used to identity information security risks

B.

Yes, a list of events that can negatively influence the achievement of information security objectives in the company should be used to identity information security risks

C.

No. alist of risk sources, business processes. and business objectives should be used to identify information security risks

Why so many professionals recommend Crack4sure?

  • Simplified and Relevant Information
  • Easy to Prepare ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Questions and Answers Format
  • Practice Tests to experience the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Real Exam Scenario
  • Information Supported with Examples and Simulations
  • Examined and Approved by the Best Industry Professionals
  • Simple, Precise and Accurate Content
  • Easy to Download ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager PDF Format

Money Back Passing Guarantee

Contrary to online courses free, with Crack4sure’s products you get an assurance of success with money back guarantee. Such a facility is not even available with exam collection and buying VCE files from the exam vendor. In all respects, Crack4sure’s products will prove to the best alternative of your money and time.